{"title":"Daily Regional Gravity Field Estimation Using GRACE Follow-On Line-of-Sight Gravity Differences","authors":"Hao-si Li, Shuang Yi, Shin-Chan Han, He Tang","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a complement to the conventional monthly global solutions by Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment series of gravimetric satellites, this study proposes an alternative method for estimating daily regional gravity field by utilizing the orbital Line-of-Sight Gravity Difference. The method is based on Slepian and B-spline basis functions for spatial and temporal parameterizations, respectively. Such parameterization of regional gravity field can be used to estimate total water storage change in a way compatible with surface mass estimation previously designed in the framework of global gravity field determination. The formal uncertainty of daily mass changes recovery is ∼5 Gt, equivalent to ∼3 cm of equivalent water height over 400<sup>2</sup> km<sup>2</sup>. In the evaluation part, the method is applied to the 2020 Bangladesh flood and the 2021 Australian flood. Our approach demonstrates strong agreement with the previous mascon-based studies, yielding Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency values exceeding 0.81, and capturing the onset and recession of the flooding events. Additionally, we investigate the impact of data gaps, occasionally occur in the space-borne missions employing intersatellite laser ranging system. Our findings indicate that the B-spline parameterization effectively determines surface mass changes even with missing data rates up to 20% or with gap lengths no longer than 2 days, highlighting its reliability for continuous monitoring in challenging observational scenarios. By providing a new methodological framework for daily-scale monitoring from satellite gravimetry, this work advances our understanding of the rapid evolution of climate extremes, which will ultimately facilitate future disaster monitoring and adaption efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a complement to the conventional monthly global solutions by Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment series of gravimetric satellites, this study proposes an alternative method for estimating daily regional gravity field by utilizing the orbital Line-of-Sight Gravity Difference. The method is based on Slepian and B-spline basis functions for spatial and temporal parameterizations, respectively. Such parameterization of regional gravity field can be used to estimate total water storage change in a way compatible with surface mass estimation previously designed in the framework of global gravity field determination. The formal uncertainty of daily mass changes recovery is ∼5 Gt, equivalent to ∼3 cm of equivalent water height over 4002 km2. In the evaluation part, the method is applied to the 2020 Bangladesh flood and the 2021 Australian flood. Our approach demonstrates strong agreement with the previous mascon-based studies, yielding Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency values exceeding 0.81, and capturing the onset and recession of the flooding events. Additionally, we investigate the impact of data gaps, occasionally occur in the space-borne missions employing intersatellite laser ranging system. Our findings indicate that the B-spline parameterization effectively determines surface mass changes even with missing data rates up to 20% or with gap lengths no longer than 2 days, highlighting its reliability for continuous monitoring in challenging observational scenarios. By providing a new methodological framework for daily-scale monitoring from satellite gravimetry, this work advances our understanding of the rapid evolution of climate extremes, which will ultimately facilitate future disaster monitoring and adaption efforts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.