Community-Informed Recommendations to Developing Inclusive Dance Opportunities: Engaging Community, Dance, and Rehabilitation Experts Using a Hybrid-Delphi Method

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1111/jar.70060

Jacqueline C. Ladwig, Kathryn M. Sibley, Jacquie Ripat, Cheryl M. Glazebrook

{"title":"Community-Informed Recommendations to Developing Inclusive Dance Opportunities: Engaging Community, Dance, and Rehabilitation Experts Using a Hybrid-Delphi Method","authors":"Jacqueline C. Ladwig, Kathryn M. Sibley, Jacquie Ripat, Cheryl M. Glazebrook","doi":"10.1111/jar.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Amongst the growing number of examples of inclusive dance programming, community-informed recommendations for inclusive dance are scarce. Our purpose was to develop recommendations for inclusive dance with dancers with the lived experience of autism, intellectual, or developmental disability, and the professionals who work with them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A Hybrid-Delphi method was used to generate and rank recommendations across three expert groups. The constraints model of motor development and the social model of disability framed three questions around: (i) physical environment and culture, (ii) instruction and strategies, and (iii) dance assistants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The experts (Community; dancers, support persons/carers (<i>n</i> = 5), Rehabilitation (<i>n</i> = 6) and Dance (<i>n</i> = 7) professionals) agreed to prioritise the community perspective, highlighting the need for ongoing education around inclusive instruction, communication, and sensory considerations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The centring of community perspectives facilitated the development of a comprehensive list of actionable recommendations to guide inclusive dance instruction in a variety of dance spaces.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Amongst the growing number of examples of inclusive dance programming, community-informed recommendations for inclusive dance are scarce. Our purpose was to develop recommendations for inclusive dance with dancers with the lived experience of autism, intellectual, or developmental disability, and the professionals who work with them.

Method

A Hybrid-Delphi method was used to generate and rank recommendations across three expert groups. The constraints model of motor development and the social model of disability framed three questions around: (i) physical environment and culture, (ii) instruction and strategies, and (iii) dance assistants.

Results

The experts (Community; dancers, support persons/carers (n = 5), Rehabilitation (n = 6) and Dance (n = 7) professionals) agreed to prioritise the community perspective, highlighting the need for ongoing education around inclusive instruction, communication, and sensory considerations.

Conclusions

The centring of community perspectives facilitated the development of a comprehensive list of actionable recommendations to guide inclusive dance instruction in a variety of dance spaces.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

社区知情建议发展包容性舞蹈机会：使用混合德尔菲方法参与社区，舞蹈和康复专家

背景在越来越多的包容性舞蹈节目的例子中，社区对包容性舞蹈的建议很少。我们的目的是为有自闭症、智力或发育障碍生活经历的舞者以及与他们一起工作的专业人员提供包容性舞蹈的建议。方法采用混合德尔菲法对三个专家组的建议进行排序。运动发展的约束模型和残疾的社会模型围绕着三个问题：(i)物理环境和文化，（ii）指导和策略，（iii）舞蹈助理。结果专家(社区；舞者，支持人员/护理人员（n = 5），康复（n = 6）和舞蹈（n = 7）专业人员)同意优先考虑社区观点，强调需要围绕包容性教学，沟通和感官考虑进行持续教育。以社区视角为中心有助于制定一份全面的可操作建议清单，以指导各种舞蹈空间的包容性舞蹈教学。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.