Temperate agroforestry for tree carbon storage in Switzerland: 10 years of biophysical and social monitoring

Giotto Roberti , Felix Herzog , Mareike Jäger , Sonja Kay
{"title":"Temperate agroforestry for tree carbon storage in Switzerland: 10 years of biophysical and social monitoring","authors":"Giotto Roberti ,&nbsp;Felix Herzog ,&nbsp;Mareike Jäger ,&nbsp;Sonja Kay","doi":"10.1016/j.csag.2025.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agroforestry, the integration of woody structures in agricultural land, has high potential for climate protection and resilience, since trees are active carbon sinks. Yet, there is only limited empirical evidence on the actual performance of temperate agroforestry systems in this respect, nor on its acceptance by farmers. We monitored four silvoarable agroforestry systems in Switzerland (apple, sour cherry, poplar, wild cherry) over ten years and measured tree growth and carbon storage performances. We compared the measured data to outcomes of the Yield-SAFE model. We regularly interviewed farmers on their observations of their agroforestry systems. Individual growth of agroforestry trees varied between species and location, with differences between the smallest and largest tree ranging from 44 ​% to 97 ​%. Consequently, the carbon sequestration potential varied substantially between 0.4 ​and ​2.5 ​t CO<sub>2eq</sub> ​per year and hectare. The modelling approach showed a good fit for apples and wild cherries and ​– ​after (re)calibration with local data ​– ​also for poplars and sour cherries. Tree mortality was up to 20 ​% in the first years but if replaced, this did not influence the overall outcome after ten years. Farmers' evaluations differed, depending on the motivation of individual farmers. They changed only slightly with time, indicating that their expectations had been realistic. The study highlights the usefulness of long-term empirical data for model calibration and of monitoring farmers' satisfaction. Realistic model predictions and management of farmers' expectations will facilitate the implementation of agroforestry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100262,"journal":{"name":"Climate Smart Agriculture","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Smart Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950409025000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry, the integration of woody structures in agricultural land, has high potential for climate protection and resilience, since trees are active carbon sinks. Yet, there is only limited empirical evidence on the actual performance of temperate agroforestry systems in this respect, nor on its acceptance by farmers. We monitored four silvoarable agroforestry systems in Switzerland (apple, sour cherry, poplar, wild cherry) over ten years and measured tree growth and carbon storage performances. We compared the measured data to outcomes of the Yield-SAFE model. We regularly interviewed farmers on their observations of their agroforestry systems. Individual growth of agroforestry trees varied between species and location, with differences between the smallest and largest tree ranging from 44 ​% to 97 ​%. Consequently, the carbon sequestration potential varied substantially between 0.4 ​and ​2.5 ​t CO2eq ​per year and hectare. The modelling approach showed a good fit for apples and wild cherries and ​– ​after (re)calibration with local data ​– ​also for poplars and sour cherries. Tree mortality was up to 20 ​% in the first years but if replaced, this did not influence the overall outcome after ten years. Farmers' evaluations differed, depending on the motivation of individual farmers. They changed only slightly with time, indicating that their expectations had been realistic. The study highlights the usefulness of long-term empirical data for model calibration and of monitoring farmers' satisfaction. Realistic model predictions and management of farmers' expectations will facilitate the implementation of agroforestry.

Abstract Image

瑞士温带农林业对树木碳储量的影响:10年生物物理和社会监测
农林业是农业用地上木结构的整合,具有很高的气候保护和恢复潜力,因为树木是活跃的碳汇。然而,关于温带农林复合系统在这方面的实际表现,以及农民对其接受程度,只有有限的经验证据。我们对瑞士的四种可造林农林业系统(苹果、酸樱桃、杨树、野樱桃)进行了十年的监测,并测量了树木的生长和碳储存性能。我们将测量数据与Yield-SAFE模型的结果进行了比较。我们定期采访农民,了解他们对农林业系统的看法。农林业乔木的单株生长因树种和地点而异,最小乔木和最大乔木的单株生长差异在44% ~ 97%之间。因此,碳固存潜力在每年和公顷0.4至2.5吨二氧化碳当量之间变化很大。这种建模方法对苹果和野樱桃很适合,在用当地数据(重新)校准后,对杨树和酸樱桃也很适合。树木死亡率在头几年高达20%,但如果更换,这不会影响十年后的总体结果。农民的评价不同,取决于个体农民的动机。随着时间的推移,它们只发生了轻微的变化,这表明他们的期望是现实的。该研究强调了长期经验数据对模型校准和监测农民满意度的有用性。现实的模型预测和对农民期望的管理将促进农林业的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信