Evaluation of a multiplex genomic point-of-care strategy for rapid support of older people with respiratory infection in a geriatric hospital over a full winter season
Marion Fayolle , Ludovic Lafaie , Thomas Franck , Marie Blanquet , Fabien de Oliveira , Thomas Bourlet , Bruno Pozzetto , Sylvie Pillet , Thomas Célarier
{"title":"Evaluation of a multiplex genomic point-of-care strategy for rapid support of older people with respiratory infection in a geriatric hospital over a full winter season","authors":"Marion Fayolle , Ludovic Lafaie , Thomas Franck , Marie Blanquet , Fabien de Oliveira , Thomas Bourlet , Bruno Pozzetto , Sylvie Pillet , Thomas Célarier","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In older patients, it is important to rapidly identify those infected by a significant pathogen in order to implement isolation measures and prescribe appropriate specific treatments when available and indicated. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multiplex genomic point-of-care (POC) strategy detecting four viruses, SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus (IV) A and B and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), in a geriatric setting located 7 km from the central laboratory of the hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective monocentric study was conducted during the 2022–2023 winter season in two geriatric wards of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France. Two automated quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests were compared, the reference test at the central laboratory and the POC test performed by nurses. The main outcome was the saved time to result (TTR) by the clinician with the POC technology. Additional objectives included testing performance, health-economic considerations and healthcare workers’ acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 69 included infectious episodes, the reference test identified 18 viral infections (7 for SARS-CoV-2, 8 for RSV, 2 for both viruses, 1 for IVA). The POC test yielded similar performance with reference test (overall concordance of 98.55 % for SARS-CoV-2 and RSV). The POC strategy showed a gain of 10.43 ( ± 6.92) hours on TTR and a cumulative time of isolation of 488.27 hours in case of negative result. Further results showed economic savings and a strong acceptability by healthcare workers in favor of the POC strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This pilot study illustrates the benefits of a genomic POC test to identify current respiratory viral infections in older people within a geriatric setting remote from the central laboratory during a winter season with multiple viral outbreaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 7","pages":"Article 102795"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125001443","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In older patients, it is important to rapidly identify those infected by a significant pathogen in order to implement isolation measures and prescribe appropriate specific treatments when available and indicated. The objective of this study was to evaluate a multiplex genomic point-of-care (POC) strategy detecting four viruses, SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus (IV) A and B and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), in a geriatric setting located 7 km from the central laboratory of the hospital.
Methods
This prospective monocentric study was conducted during the 2022–2023 winter season in two geriatric wards of the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, France. Two automated quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests were compared, the reference test at the central laboratory and the POC test performed by nurses. The main outcome was the saved time to result (TTR) by the clinician with the POC technology. Additional objectives included testing performance, health-economic considerations and healthcare workers’ acceptability.
Results
From 69 included infectious episodes, the reference test identified 18 viral infections (7 for SARS-CoV-2, 8 for RSV, 2 for both viruses, 1 for IVA). The POC test yielded similar performance with reference test (overall concordance of 98.55 % for SARS-CoV-2 and RSV). The POC strategy showed a gain of 10.43 ( ± 6.92) hours on TTR and a cumulative time of isolation of 488.27 hours in case of negative result. Further results showed economic savings and a strong acceptability by healthcare workers in favor of the POC strategy.
Conclusions
This pilot study illustrates the benefits of a genomic POC test to identify current respiratory viral infections in older people within a geriatric setting remote from the central laboratory during a winter season with multiple viral outbreaks.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.