Do climate risks impede green innovation?

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Siying Quan , Peng Cheng , Jia Zhai
{"title":"Do climate risks impede green innovation?","authors":"Siying Quan ,&nbsp;Peng Cheng ,&nbsp;Jia Zhai","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change poses significant challenges to global sustainability transitions, with emerging markets confronting distinct systemic barriers including severe resource constraints and institutional voids that disproportionately impede green productivity. While green innovation inherently demands substantial R&amp;D investments and extended development cycles, its progression under resource-constrained countries remains underexplored. Drawing on resource-based and institution-based views, this study presents the first empirical evidence of the adverse impact of the prince-level climate risk on green innovation. It identifies financing constraints, operational solvency, and public awareness as key channels through which climate risk affects green innovation. Employing a difference-in-differences design that exploits China's national climate policy implementation as a quasi-natural experiment, we reinforce causal inference. Notably, state-owned enterprises, a dominant force in China's economy, underperform in green innovation due to agency problems whereas non-SOEs demonstrate greater adaptive capacity. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about climate risks' positive role in driving green innovation and offer insights for policymakers and managers addressing the green transition paradox in emerging markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104295"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925003825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change poses significant challenges to global sustainability transitions, with emerging markets confronting distinct systemic barriers including severe resource constraints and institutional voids that disproportionately impede green productivity. While green innovation inherently demands substantial R&D investments and extended development cycles, its progression under resource-constrained countries remains underexplored. Drawing on resource-based and institution-based views, this study presents the first empirical evidence of the adverse impact of the prince-level climate risk on green innovation. It identifies financing constraints, operational solvency, and public awareness as key channels through which climate risk affects green innovation. Employing a difference-in-differences design that exploits China's national climate policy implementation as a quasi-natural experiment, we reinforce causal inference. Notably, state-owned enterprises, a dominant force in China's economy, underperform in green innovation due to agency problems whereas non-SOEs demonstrate greater adaptive capacity. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about climate risks' positive role in driving green innovation and offer insights for policymakers and managers addressing the green transition paradox in emerging markets.
气候风险会阻碍绿色创新吗?
气候变化对全球可持续性转型构成重大挑战,新兴市场面临明显的系统性障碍,包括严重的资源限制和制度空白,严重阻碍了绿色生产力。虽然绿色创新本质上需要大量的研发投资和延长的开发周期,但在资源有限的国家,其进展仍未得到充分探索。利用资源基础和制度基础的观点,本研究首次提出了王子级气候风险对绿色创新不利影响的实证证据。报告指出,融资约束、运营偿付能力和公众意识是气候风险影响绿色创新的关键渠道。采用差异中的差异设计,利用中国国家气候政策实施作为准自然实验,我们加强因果推理。值得注意的是,作为中国经济主体的国有企业由于代理问题,在绿色创新方面表现不佳,而非国有企业则表现出更强的适应能力。这些发现挑战了关于气候风险在推动绿色创新方面具有积极作用的传统假设,并为解决新兴市场绿色转型悖论的政策制定者和管理者提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信