Henry Shaver , Junghwan Kim , Ehab Diab , Jinhyung Lee
{"title":"Bridging the gap: A social equity analysis of intra-city transit access to inter-city rail in Canada","authors":"Henry Shaver , Junghwan Kim , Ehab Diab , Jinhyung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To support the decarbonization of inter-city transport and reduce the risk of marginalized populations being excluded from long-distance travel, intra-city transit systems should provide equitable access to inter-city rail network nodes. This study evaluates transit-based accessibility to inter-city rail stations in seven Canadian cities along the Québec City–Windsor corridor through an equity lens. Specifically, we evaluate accessibility inequalities using Gini coefficients and three accessibility ratios based on income, race, and age. While Gini coefficients reveal no clear link between city size and inequality, the three socioeconomic status-based accessibility ratios indicate that marginalized population groups face significant inequalities in the two largest cities: Toronto and Montréal. In these two cities, low-income individuals, visible minorities, and older citizens experience inequitable accessibility, with longer transit travel times to inter-city rail stations. These findings highlight the uneven distribution of transit access to inter-city rail services in larger cities, potentially deepening social exclusion for vulnerable population groups and hindering the transition to sustainable inter-city travel. By examining intra-city transit access to inter-city rail through a social equity lens, this study offers valuable insights into the social equity of intermodal connectivity in Canada and provides a framework for similar assessments in other geographic contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106041"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125003415","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To support the decarbonization of inter-city transport and reduce the risk of marginalized populations being excluded from long-distance travel, intra-city transit systems should provide equitable access to inter-city rail network nodes. This study evaluates transit-based accessibility to inter-city rail stations in seven Canadian cities along the Québec City–Windsor corridor through an equity lens. Specifically, we evaluate accessibility inequalities using Gini coefficients and three accessibility ratios based on income, race, and age. While Gini coefficients reveal no clear link between city size and inequality, the three socioeconomic status-based accessibility ratios indicate that marginalized population groups face significant inequalities in the two largest cities: Toronto and Montréal. In these two cities, low-income individuals, visible minorities, and older citizens experience inequitable accessibility, with longer transit travel times to inter-city rail stations. These findings highlight the uneven distribution of transit access to inter-city rail services in larger cities, potentially deepening social exclusion for vulnerable population groups and hindering the transition to sustainable inter-city travel. By examining intra-city transit access to inter-city rail through a social equity lens, this study offers valuable insights into the social equity of intermodal connectivity in Canada and provides a framework for similar assessments in other geographic contexts.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.