The geometric nature of homeostatic stress in biological growth

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Erlich , G. Zurlo
{"title":"The geometric nature of homeostatic stress in biological growth","authors":"A. Erlich ,&nbsp;G. Zurlo","doi":"10.1016/j.jmps.2025.106155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Morphogenesis, the process of growth and shape formation in biological tissues, is driven by complex interactions between mechanical, biochemical, and genetic factors. Traditional models of biological growth often rely on the concept of homeostatic Eshelby stress, which defines an ideal target state for the growing body. Any local deviation from this state triggers growth and remodelling, aimed at restoring balance between mechanical forces and biological adaptation. Despite its relevance in the biomechanical context, the nature of homeostatic stress remains elusive, with its value and spatial distribution often chosen arbitrarily, lacking a clear biological interpretation or understanding of its connection to the lower scales of the tissue. To bring clarity on the nature of homeostatic stress, we shift the focus from Eshelby stress to growth incompatibility, a measure of geometric frustration in the tissue that is the primary source of residual stresses in the developing body. Incompatibility, which is measured by the Ricci tensor of the growth metric at the continuous level, can be potentially regulated at the cell level through the formation of appropriate networks and connections with the surrounding cells, making it a more meaningful concept than homeostatic stress as a fixed target. In this geometric perspective, achieving a homeostatic state corresponds to the establishment of a physiological level of frustration in the body, a process leading to the generation and maintenance of the mechanical stresses that are crucial to tissue functionality. While residual stress can be induced through either active contraction or differential growth, the latter is the focus of this work. In this work we present a formulation of biological growth that penalises deviations from a desired state of incompatibility, similar to the way the Einstein–Hilbert action operates in General Relativity. The proposed framework offers a clear and physically grounded approach that elucidates the regulation of size and shape, while providing a means to link cellular and tissue scales in biological systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17331,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 106155"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509625001310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Morphogenesis, the process of growth and shape formation in biological tissues, is driven by complex interactions between mechanical, biochemical, and genetic factors. Traditional models of biological growth often rely on the concept of homeostatic Eshelby stress, which defines an ideal target state for the growing body. Any local deviation from this state triggers growth and remodelling, aimed at restoring balance between mechanical forces and biological adaptation. Despite its relevance in the biomechanical context, the nature of homeostatic stress remains elusive, with its value and spatial distribution often chosen arbitrarily, lacking a clear biological interpretation or understanding of its connection to the lower scales of the tissue. To bring clarity on the nature of homeostatic stress, we shift the focus from Eshelby stress to growth incompatibility, a measure of geometric frustration in the tissue that is the primary source of residual stresses in the developing body. Incompatibility, which is measured by the Ricci tensor of the growth metric at the continuous level, can be potentially regulated at the cell level through the formation of appropriate networks and connections with the surrounding cells, making it a more meaningful concept than homeostatic stress as a fixed target. In this geometric perspective, achieving a homeostatic state corresponds to the establishment of a physiological level of frustration in the body, a process leading to the generation and maintenance of the mechanical stresses that are crucial to tissue functionality. While residual stress can be induced through either active contraction or differential growth, the latter is the focus of this work. In this work we present a formulation of biological growth that penalises deviations from a desired state of incompatibility, similar to the way the Einstein–Hilbert action operates in General Relativity. The proposed framework offers a clear and physically grounded approach that elucidates the regulation of size and shape, while providing a means to link cellular and tissue scales in biological systems.
生物生长中稳态应力的几何性质
形态发生是生物组织生长和形状形成的过程,是由机械、生化和遗传因素之间复杂的相互作用驱动的。传统的生物生长模型通常依赖于稳态埃谢尔比应激的概念,它定义了生长体的理想目标状态。任何局部偏离这种状态都会触发生长和重塑,旨在恢复机械力和生物适应之间的平衡。尽管在生物力学背景下具有相关性,但稳态应力的性质仍然难以捉摸,其值和空间分布通常是任意选择的,缺乏明确的生物学解释或对其与组织较低尺度的联系的理解。为了阐明内稳态应力的本质,我们将重点从Eshelby应力转移到生长不相容,这是一种测量组织中几何挫折的方法,是发育体中残余应力的主要来源。不亲和性在连续水平上由生长度量的Ricci张量测量,可以通过与周围细胞形成适当的网络和连接,在细胞水平上进行潜在的调节,使其成为比作为固定目标的稳态应力更有意义的概念。从这个几何角度来看,达到体内平衡状态对应于在体内建立生理水平的挫折,这一过程导致对组织功能至关重要的机械应力的产生和维持。虽然残余应力可以通过主动收缩或微分生长引起,但后者是本工作的重点。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种生物生长的公式,该公式惩罚偏离理想的不相容状态,类似于爱因斯坦-希尔伯特作用在广义相对论中的运作方式。所提出的框架提供了一个明确的和物理基础的方法,阐明了大小和形状的调节,同时提供了一种在生物系统中连接细胞和组织尺度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids
Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of The Mechanics and Physics of Solids is to publish research of the highest quality and of lasting significance on the mechanics of solids. The scope is broad, from fundamental concepts in mechanics to the analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Solids are interpreted broadly to include both hard and soft materials as well as natural and synthetic structures. The approach can be theoretical, experimental or computational.This research activity sits within engineering science and the allied areas of applied mathematics, materials science, bio-mechanics, applied physics, and geophysics. The Journal was founded in 1952 by Rodney Hill, who was its Editor-in-Chief until 1968. The topics of interest to the Journal evolve with developments in the subject but its basic ethos remains the same: to publish research of the highest quality relating to the mechanics of solids. Thus, emphasis is placed on the development of fundamental concepts of mechanics and novel applications of these concepts based on theoretical, experimental or computational approaches, drawing upon the various branches of engineering science and the allied areas within applied mathematics, materials science, structural engineering, applied physics, and geophysics. The main purpose of the Journal is to foster scientific understanding of the processes of deformation and mechanical failure of all solid materials, both technological and natural, and the connections between these processes and their underlying physical mechanisms. In this sense, the content of the Journal should reflect the current state of the discipline in analysis, experimental observation, and numerical simulation. In the interest of achieving this goal, authors are encouraged to consider the significance of their contributions for the field of mechanics and the implications of their results, in addition to describing the details of their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信