Always to neglect? About the contribution of tooling to product carbon footprints – Conclusions from literature, industry survey, and case studies

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kai Rüdele , Barbara Linke , Matthias Wolf
{"title":"Always to neglect? About the contribution of tooling to product carbon footprints – Conclusions from literature, industry survey, and case studies","authors":"Kai Rüdele ,&nbsp;Barbara Linke ,&nbsp;Matthias Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The product carbon footprint (PCF) is a fundamental tool that offers a comprehensive analysis of emissions on the product level to re-think product designs and industrial processes to launch new climate benign products. Methodical issues associated with the determination of PCFs have been discussed for a long time. This article aims to assess the up to now unexplored inclusion of manufacturing tools as contributor to industrial process emissions. Based on literature and results of a previous survey, it can be concluded that the production and use of tools is barely considered in PCF studies and viewed as less significant than other inputs. However, supplementary case studies conducted in the automotive supply industry show that in individual cases greenhouse gas emissions related to tool use can have a considerable effect on the PCF, depending on the process and production volume. Based on these findings, we developed a guide to support the decision on whether to incorporate or exclude tool consumption in PCF studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100277"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789425000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The product carbon footprint (PCF) is a fundamental tool that offers a comprehensive analysis of emissions on the product level to re-think product designs and industrial processes to launch new climate benign products. Methodical issues associated with the determination of PCFs have been discussed for a long time. This article aims to assess the up to now unexplored inclusion of manufacturing tools as contributor to industrial process emissions. Based on literature and results of a previous survey, it can be concluded that the production and use of tools is barely considered in PCF studies and viewed as less significant than other inputs. However, supplementary case studies conducted in the automotive supply industry show that in individual cases greenhouse gas emissions related to tool use can have a considerable effect on the PCF, depending on the process and production volume. Based on these findings, we developed a guide to support the decision on whether to incorporate or exclude tool consumption in PCF studies.

Abstract Image

总是忽视?关于工具对产品碳足迹的贡献-来自文献,行业调查和案例研究的结论
产品碳足迹(PCF)是一种基本工具,它提供了对产品层面排放的全面分析,以重新思考产品设计和工业流程,以推出新的气候良性产品。与PCFs测定相关的方法问题已经讨论了很长时间。本文旨在评估到目前为止尚未探索的包括制造工具作为工业过程排放的贡献者。根据文献和先前调查的结果,可以得出结论,在PCF研究中几乎没有考虑到工具的生产和使用,并且认为其重要性低于其他投入。然而,在汽车供应行业进行的补充案例研究表明,在个别情况下,与工具使用相关的温室气体排放会对PCF产生相当大的影响,具体取决于工艺和产量。基于这些发现,我们制定了一个指南,以支持在PCF研究中是否纳入或排除工具消耗的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信