Modelling the effect of a carbon tax on the development of a cultivated protein industry: a Norwegian case study

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nicholas Roxburgh , Rob J.F. Burton , Klaus Mittenzwei , J. Gareth Polhill
{"title":"Modelling the effect of a carbon tax on the development of a cultivated protein industry: a Norwegian case study","authors":"Nicholas Roxburgh ,&nbsp;Rob J.F. Burton ,&nbsp;Klaus Mittenzwei ,&nbsp;J. Gareth Polhill","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cultivated protein (also called <em>in vitro</em>, lab-based, cultured protein) startups emerged in the 2010s in response to technological advances in the medical/pharmaceutical sector alongside the global demand for more environmentally sustainable food systems. Offering greenhouse gas reductions of up to 97 %, these technologies could provide a means of rapidly reducing emissions from agriculture. However, heavy subsidisation of the livestock sector in many countries puts them at a considerable disadvantage. In this paper we explore what would happen if we rebalanced the equation through the introduction of a carbon tax on animal protein. Using an agent-based approach (ABM) we develop a detailed model of agricultural systems in Norway and explore a number of cost scenarios based around two main hypothetical events: the introduction of cultivated proteins without a carbon tax and the introduction of cultivated proteins alongside a carbon tax. Simulations reveal that conventional beef, lamb, milk, and egg production are more vulnerable to a steady loss of market share to cultivated protein than pork and chicken production – regardless of whether a carbon tax is in operation. However, the introduction of a carbon tax would result in a rapid and substantial decline in these sectors due to the dramatically increased costs imposed on conventional producers and the triggering of tipping points along value chains. Conventional pork and chicken sectors prove more robust due to their comparatively lower emissions. The overall conclusion is that the introduction of a carbon tax alongside the emergence of a cultivated protein industry could have severe impacts on the livestock sector that make the outcome politically unacceptable. Any global or Europe-wide carbon tax could thus, paradoxically, limit the introduction of revolutionary new low-carbon food technologies unless the introduction is carefully managed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825001028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultivated protein (also called in vitro, lab-based, cultured protein) startups emerged in the 2010s in response to technological advances in the medical/pharmaceutical sector alongside the global demand for more environmentally sustainable food systems. Offering greenhouse gas reductions of up to 97 %, these technologies could provide a means of rapidly reducing emissions from agriculture. However, heavy subsidisation of the livestock sector in many countries puts them at a considerable disadvantage. In this paper we explore what would happen if we rebalanced the equation through the introduction of a carbon tax on animal protein. Using an agent-based approach (ABM) we develop a detailed model of agricultural systems in Norway and explore a number of cost scenarios based around two main hypothetical events: the introduction of cultivated proteins without a carbon tax and the introduction of cultivated proteins alongside a carbon tax. Simulations reveal that conventional beef, lamb, milk, and egg production are more vulnerable to a steady loss of market share to cultivated protein than pork and chicken production – regardless of whether a carbon tax is in operation. However, the introduction of a carbon tax would result in a rapid and substantial decline in these sectors due to the dramatically increased costs imposed on conventional producers and the triggering of tipping points along value chains. Conventional pork and chicken sectors prove more robust due to their comparatively lower emissions. The overall conclusion is that the introduction of a carbon tax alongside the emergence of a cultivated protein industry could have severe impacts on the livestock sector that make the outcome politically unacceptable. Any global or Europe-wide carbon tax could thus, paradoxically, limit the introduction of revolutionary new low-carbon food technologies unless the introduction is carefully managed.
碳税对养殖蛋白质产业发展的影响建模:挪威案例研究
为了应对医疗/制药领域的技术进步以及全球对更环保的可持续食品系统的需求,在2010年代出现了培养蛋白(也称为体外、实验室培养蛋白)初创公司。这些技术可以减少高达97%的温室气体排放,为迅速减少农业排放提供了一种手段。然而,许多国家对畜牧业的大量补贴使它们处于相当不利的地位。在本文中,我们探讨了如果我们通过对动物蛋白征收碳税来重新平衡这个等式会发生什么。使用基于主体的方法(ABM),我们开发了挪威农业系统的详细模型,并围绕两个主要假设事件探索了许多成本情景:在不征收碳税的情况下引入栽培蛋白质,以及在征收碳税的同时引入栽培蛋白质。模拟显示,与猪肉和鸡肉生产相比,传统的牛肉、羊肉、牛奶和鸡蛋生产更容易受到养殖蛋白质市场份额不断流失的影响——无论碳税是否实施。然而,碳税的引入将导致这些行业迅速大幅下降,因为传统生产商的成本将大幅增加,价值链上的临界点将被触发。由于排放量相对较低,传统的猪肉和鸡肉行业更为强劲。总的结论是,碳税的引入以及养殖蛋白质产业的出现可能会对畜牧业产生严重影响,这使得结果在政治上不可接受。因此,矛盾的是,任何全球性或全欧洲范围的碳税都可能限制革命性低碳食品新技术的引入,除非这种引入得到精心管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信