Longitudinal clinical outcomes based on cognitive and hippocampal clusters of first episode psychosis

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lucas A. Ronat , Delphine Raucher-Chéné , Katie M. Lavigne , Mallar Chakravarty , Ridha Joober , Ashok Malla , Jai Shah , Martin Lepage
{"title":"Longitudinal clinical outcomes based on cognitive and hippocampal clusters of first episode psychosis","authors":"Lucas A. Ronat ,&nbsp;Delphine Raucher-Chéné ,&nbsp;Katie M. Lavigne ,&nbsp;Mallar Chakravarty ,&nbsp;Ridha Joober ,&nbsp;Ashok Malla ,&nbsp;Jai Shah ,&nbsp;Martin Lepage","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In first episode psychosis (FEP), cognitive impairments are core features contributing to clinical and functional heterogeneity. Significant impairment indicates greater clinical severity throughout the course of the illness, particularly for negative symptoms. Hippocampal volume is smaller in FEP than in healthy controls (notably subfields like Cornu Ammonis 1–3 and subiculum), and is related to cognitive impairments and negative symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional trajectories of FEP subgroups as a function of cognitive performance and hippocampal volumes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>One hundred FEP patients and sixty healthy controls initially assessed using the CogState research battery, underwent 3 T MRI to extract hippocampal subfields and adjacent structures using the MAGeT brain algorithm. Clinical assessments were carried out for negative (Motivational and Pleasure – MAP, and diminished expression – EXP) and depressive symptoms, and global functioning. Measurements were taken at 4 time points (3, 9, 15, 21 months following program entry). Based on available first timepoint standardized cognitive and hippocampal features, using healthy controls as reference, clusters were determined by a hierarchical ascending classification. Their clinical and functional longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three baseline clusters were revealed: normal-range hippocampal volume with low attention, working and verbal memory (FEP 0), small hippocampus with low verbal memory and social cognition (FEP 1), and large hippocampus with low verbal memory (FEP 2). At baseline, the clusters did not differ on symptoms severity and global functioning. Longitudinally, MAP, EXP and depressive symptoms decreased over time in FEP 0. Global functioning improved in FEP 0 and FEP 1, while FEP 2 was clinically and functionally stable over time. Longitudinal inter-group comparisons did not yield any significant differences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The clusters were dissociated between hippocampus and cognition, but their trajectories suggest the importance of hippocampal integrity in the clinical and/or functional outcome. Future studies are needed to understand intervention efficiency depending on hippocampal integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 111392"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584625001460","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In first episode psychosis (FEP), cognitive impairments are core features contributing to clinical and functional heterogeneity. Significant impairment indicates greater clinical severity throughout the course of the illness, particularly for negative symptoms. Hippocampal volume is smaller in FEP than in healthy controls (notably subfields like Cornu Ammonis 1–3 and subiculum), and is related to cognitive impairments and negative symptoms. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional trajectories of FEP subgroups as a function of cognitive performance and hippocampal volumes.

Methods

One hundred FEP patients and sixty healthy controls initially assessed using the CogState research battery, underwent 3 T MRI to extract hippocampal subfields and adjacent structures using the MAGeT brain algorithm. Clinical assessments were carried out for negative (Motivational and Pleasure – MAP, and diminished expression – EXP) and depressive symptoms, and global functioning. Measurements were taken at 4 time points (3, 9, 15, 21 months following program entry). Based on available first timepoint standardized cognitive and hippocampal features, using healthy controls as reference, clusters were determined by a hierarchical ascending classification. Their clinical and functional longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

Results

Three baseline clusters were revealed: normal-range hippocampal volume with low attention, working and verbal memory (FEP 0), small hippocampus with low verbal memory and social cognition (FEP 1), and large hippocampus with low verbal memory (FEP 2). At baseline, the clusters did not differ on symptoms severity and global functioning. Longitudinally, MAP, EXP and depressive symptoms decreased over time in FEP 0. Global functioning improved in FEP 0 and FEP 1, while FEP 2 was clinically and functionally stable over time. Longitudinal inter-group comparisons did not yield any significant differences.

Conclusion

The clusters were dissociated between hippocampus and cognition, but their trajectories suggest the importance of hippocampal integrity in the clinical and/or functional outcome. Future studies are needed to understand intervention efficiency depending on hippocampal integrity.
基于首发精神病认知和海马群的纵向临床结果
背景在首发精神病(FEP)中,认知障碍是导致临床和功能异质性的核心特征。显著损伤表明在整个病程中临床严重程度更高,特别是阴性症状。FEP患者的海马体体积小于健康对照组(尤其是像锥体1-3和耻骨下等子区),并且与认知障碍和阴性症状有关。本研究的目的是比较FEP亚组的临床和功能轨迹作为认知表现和海马体积的功能。方法采用CogState研究电池对100例FEP患者和60名健康对照者进行初步评估,使用MAGeT脑算法进行3t MRI提取海马亚区和邻近结构。临床评估阴性(动机和愉悦- MAP,表达减少- EXP)和抑郁症状,以及整体功能。在4个时间点(项目开始后3、9、15、21个月)进行测量。基于可用的第一时间点标准化认知和海马特征,以健康对照为参考,采用分层上升分类法确定聚类。使用线性混合效应模型分析他们的临床和功能纵向轨迹。结果显示了3个基线集群:正常范围内低注意、工作和言语记忆的海马体积(FEP 0)、低言语记忆和社会认知的小海马体积(FEP 1)和低言语记忆的大海马体积(FEP 2)。在基线时,这些群集在症状严重程度和整体功能上没有差异。纵向上,MAP、EXP和抑郁症状在FEP 0中随时间的推移而下降。FEP 0和FEP 1的整体功能得到改善,而FEP 2的临床和功能随着时间的推移保持稳定。纵向组间比较无显著差异。结论这些簇在海马和认知之间是分离的,但它们的轨迹表明海马完整性在临床和/或功能结局中的重要性。未来的研究需要了解干预效率取决于海马的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信