College Students’ Perceptions and Willingness to Report Intimate Partner Violence

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Lainee Mclennan, Magen Lyne, Kameko Halfmann
{"title":"College Students’ Perceptions and Willingness to Report Intimate Partner Violence","authors":"Lainee Mclennan, Magen Lyne, Kameko Halfmann","doi":"10.1177/08862605251336336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past research suggests that college students perceive nonphysical (e.g., psychological) intimate partner violence (IPV) as less severe than physical IPV, but less is understood about how situational factors may impact perceptions of IPV. There is also less research on victim blaming across different types of IPV and IPV in non-heteronormative relationships. We used a mixed design with the type of IPV (control, emotional, intimidation, and physical) as a within-participants variable and alcohol presence and prior occurrences as between-subjects variables. Participants ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 208) were college students at a regional Midwestern university. The participants were presented with vignettes depicting the different types of IPV and then asked a series of questions about perceived severity, the responsibility of the victim, and the responsibility to formally report. Gender-neutral names were used within the vignettes. The results show that participants found physical violence to be more severe than other types of violence; however, there was little to no effect of situational factors such as alcohol presence or prior incidents. The type of IPV had little to no effect on victim blaming. Participants were more likely to report physical IPV than psychological IPV. This research suggests that higher education institutions should invest in more education on nonphysical forms of IPV, which often leads to worse mental health outcomes despite student perceptions that nonphysical violence is less severe.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251336336","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past research suggests that college students perceive nonphysical (e.g., psychological) intimate partner violence (IPV) as less severe than physical IPV, but less is understood about how situational factors may impact perceptions of IPV. There is also less research on victim blaming across different types of IPV and IPV in non-heteronormative relationships. We used a mixed design with the type of IPV (control, emotional, intimidation, and physical) as a within-participants variable and alcohol presence and prior occurrences as between-subjects variables. Participants ( N = 208) were college students at a regional Midwestern university. The participants were presented with vignettes depicting the different types of IPV and then asked a series of questions about perceived severity, the responsibility of the victim, and the responsibility to formally report. Gender-neutral names were used within the vignettes. The results show that participants found physical violence to be more severe than other types of violence; however, there was little to no effect of situational factors such as alcohol presence or prior incidents. The type of IPV had little to no effect on victim blaming. Participants were more likely to report physical IPV than psychological IPV. This research suggests that higher education institutions should invest in more education on nonphysical forms of IPV, which often leads to worse mental health outcomes despite student perceptions that nonphysical violence is less severe.
大学生报告亲密伴侣暴力的认知与意愿
过去的研究表明,大学生认为非身体(如心理)亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)不如身体暴力严重,但对情境因素如何影响IPV的看法了解较少。在不同类型的IPV和非异性恋规范关系中的IPV中,对受害者责备的研究也较少。我们采用混合设计,其中IPV类型(控制、情绪、恐吓和身体)作为参与者内部变量,酒精存在和既往事件作为受试者之间变量。参与者(N = 208)是中西部地区一所大学的大学生。研究人员向参与者展示了描述不同类型IPV的小插图,然后询问了一系列关于感知到的严重性、受害者的责任和正式报告的责任的问题。在小插图中使用了中性的名字。结果显示,参与者认为身体暴力比其他类型的暴力更严重;然而,情境因素,如酒精存在或先前的事件,几乎没有影响。IPV的类型对受害者的指责几乎没有影响。参与者更有可能报告身体上的IPV而不是心理上的IPV。这项研究表明,高等教育机构应该更多地投资于非身体形式的IPV教育,尽管学生认为非身体暴力不那么严重,但这往往会导致更糟糕的心理健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信