Impact of genomic selection for growth and carcass traits on foot structure in Angus cattle

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Zuleica Trujano, Jorge Hidalgo, Gopal Gowane, Kelli Retallick, Andre Garcia, Daniela Lourenco, Ignacy Misztal
{"title":"Impact of genomic selection for growth and carcass traits on foot structure in Angus cattle","authors":"Zuleica Trujano, Jorge Hidalgo, Gopal Gowane, Kelli Retallick, Andre Garcia, Daniela Lourenco, Ignacy Misztal","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genomic evaluation improves accuracy and enables shorter generation intervals, accelerating genetic changes, possibly strengthening the antagonism between performance and less-selected traits. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of genomic selection for performance on foot structure in Angus cattle. Variance component estimation was done under the Bayesian approach (VCE) with partial or no genotypes, and with a new method based on predictivity (PRED) using all genotypes, this to examine changes in genetic parameters over time. The performance trait groups were growth (GT), carcass (CT), ultrasound carcass (uCT), and marbling (MT). Foot structure traits (FT) were foot angle (FA) and claw set (CS). Genetic parameters through VCE over 5-year intervals and using genotypes were obtained. From 2011-2015 to 2019-2022, changes in heritability were observed for CS (0.12 ± 0.01 to 0.16 ±, FA (0.18 ± 0.02 to 0.14 ± 0.01), carcass weight (0.30 ± 0.03 to 0.35 ± 0.04), marbling (0.43 ± 0.02 to 0.60 ± 0.04), and ultrasound backfat thickness (0.32 ± 0.01 to 0.38 ± 0.01). Changes in genetic correlations were found for CS-carcass weight (0.25 ± 0.15 to -0.04 ± 0.08), CS-rib eye area (0.20 ± 0.11 to -0.12 ± 0.08), and CS-weight at ultrasound scanning (0.12 ± 0.06 to 0.0 ± 0.03). For PRED, estimates from two 2-year slices showed that most GT and uCT heritabilities were lower than those from the last VCE interval (e.g., birth weight: 0.34 vs. 0.26). In comparison, FT heritabilities were higher (e.g., CS: 0.16 vs. 0.29). In general, all genetic correlations from PRED ranged from -0.15 to 0.10, whereas the values were between -0.15 and 0.05 in the last interval based on VCE. The predictivity method provides updated genetic parameters for young animals, whereas VCE estimates refer to the base population. Including genotypes had a strong impact on some estimates. Our results indicate that heritability estimates in recent generations for strongly selected traits have decreased compared to older generations. However, genetic correlations between foot structure and performance traits have consistently remained close to zero, likely due to the differences in selection intensity between these traits. While no strong antagonistic correlations were found, selecting multiple traits is crucial to maintain conformation while improving performance. Since the population structure changes due to genetic or environmental factors, updating the genetic parameters is vital for achieving expected genetic gains.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomic evaluation improves accuracy and enables shorter generation intervals, accelerating genetic changes, possibly strengthening the antagonism between performance and less-selected traits. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of genomic selection for performance on foot structure in Angus cattle. Variance component estimation was done under the Bayesian approach (VCE) with partial or no genotypes, and with a new method based on predictivity (PRED) using all genotypes, this to examine changes in genetic parameters over time. The performance trait groups were growth (GT), carcass (CT), ultrasound carcass (uCT), and marbling (MT). Foot structure traits (FT) were foot angle (FA) and claw set (CS). Genetic parameters through VCE over 5-year intervals and using genotypes were obtained. From 2011-2015 to 2019-2022, changes in heritability were observed for CS (0.12 ± 0.01 to 0.16 ±, FA (0.18 ± 0.02 to 0.14 ± 0.01), carcass weight (0.30 ± 0.03 to 0.35 ± 0.04), marbling (0.43 ± 0.02 to 0.60 ± 0.04), and ultrasound backfat thickness (0.32 ± 0.01 to 0.38 ± 0.01). Changes in genetic correlations were found for CS-carcass weight (0.25 ± 0.15 to -0.04 ± 0.08), CS-rib eye area (0.20 ± 0.11 to -0.12 ± 0.08), and CS-weight at ultrasound scanning (0.12 ± 0.06 to 0.0 ± 0.03). For PRED, estimates from two 2-year slices showed that most GT and uCT heritabilities were lower than those from the last VCE interval (e.g., birth weight: 0.34 vs. 0.26). In comparison, FT heritabilities were higher (e.g., CS: 0.16 vs. 0.29). In general, all genetic correlations from PRED ranged from -0.15 to 0.10, whereas the values were between -0.15 and 0.05 in the last interval based on VCE. The predictivity method provides updated genetic parameters for young animals, whereas VCE estimates refer to the base population. Including genotypes had a strong impact on some estimates. Our results indicate that heritability estimates in recent generations for strongly selected traits have decreased compared to older generations. However, genetic correlations between foot structure and performance traits have consistently remained close to zero, likely due to the differences in selection intensity between these traits. While no strong antagonistic correlations were found, selecting multiple traits is crucial to maintain conformation while improving performance. Since the population structure changes due to genetic or environmental factors, updating the genetic parameters is vital for achieving expected genetic gains.
生长和胴体性状基因组选择对安格斯牛足部结构的影响
基因组评估提高了准确性,缩短了世代间隔,加速了遗传变化,可能加强了性能和较少选择性状之间的拮抗作用。我们的目的是评估基因选择对安格斯牛足部结构的影响。采用部分基因型或无基因型的贝叶斯方法(VCE)进行方差成分估计,并采用基于预测的新方法(PRED)对所有基因型进行方差成分估计,以检测遗传参数随时间的变化。生产性状组分别为生长(GT)、胴体(CT)、超声胴体(uCT)和大理石纹(MT)。足部结构特征为足角(FA)和爪距(CS)。通过间隔5年的VCE和使用基因型获得遗传参数。2011-2015年至2019-2022年,遗传力分别为CS(0.12±0.01 ~ 0.16±)、FA(0.18±0.02 ~ 0.14±0.01)、胴体重(0.30±0.03 ~ 0.35±0.04)、大理石纹(0.43±0.02 ~ 0.60±0.04)和超声背膘厚度(0.32±0.01 ~ 0.38±0.01)。cs -胴体重(0.25±0.15 ~ -0.04±0.08)、cs -肋眼面积(0.20±0.11 ~ -0.12±0.08)和cs -超声扫描体重(0.12±0.06 ~ 0.0±0.03)的遗传相关性均发生变化。对于PRED,来自两个2年切片的估计显示,大多数GT和uCT遗传率低于上次VCE间隔的遗传率(例如,出生体重:0.34 vs. 0.26)。相比之下,FT遗传力更高(例如,CS: 0.16 vs. 0.29)。总体而言,基于PRED的遗传相关在-0.15 ~ 0.10之间,而基于VCE的遗传相关在-0.15 ~ 0.05之间。预测方法提供了年轻动物的最新遗传参数,而VCE估计是指基础种群。包括基因型对一些估计有很大的影响。我们的研究结果表明,与老一代相比,最近几代人对强选择性状的遗传力估计有所下降。然而,足部结构和性能性状之间的遗传相关性一直接近于零,这可能是由于这些性状之间的选择强度存在差异。虽然没有发现强烈的拮抗相关性,但选择多个性状对于在提高性能的同时保持构象至关重要。由于种群结构因遗传或环境因素而发生变化,更新遗传参数对于实现预期的遗传增益至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信