The role of second trimester uterine artery doppler using uterine artery score in routine prenatal care in Switzerland

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sara Ardabili, Markus Hodel, Ines Kaufmann, Stefanie Pelikan, Joachim Kohl
{"title":"The role of second trimester uterine artery doppler using uterine artery score in routine prenatal care in Switzerland","authors":"Sara Ardabili,&nbsp;Markus Hodel,&nbsp;Ines Kaufmann,&nbsp;Stefanie Pelikan,&nbsp;Joachim Kohl","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The role of 2nd trimester uterine artery Doppler (UtAd) remains unclear and its implementation varies greatly. Aim of this study was to determine whether 2nd trimester UtAd interpreted with uterine artery score (UAS), a score combining PI and notching in both UtA, is useful in an unselected population in routine care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively calculated the UAS in 503 unselected singleton pregnancies with 2nd trimester scan at 20–24 weeks between 09/2021 and 08/2023 and later delivery in our department and analysed its relationship with perinatal outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With UAS &gt; 2 there was a significant increase in adverse perinatal outcome such as hypertension/PE (OR 7.88), SGA (OR 6.82), preterm birth (OR 5.51) and placental abruption (OR 6.89). In contrast, no significant difference was found when comparing UAS 0, 1 and 2. In general, NPV for adverse outcomes were high while PPV were low. In 50 % of SGA-fetuses and 33 % of cases with hypertension/PE in UAS 3–4, the woman had no risk factor.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Routine 2nd trimester UtAd is useful in all pregnancies as it can identify additional patients without a pre-existing risk who generally would not be eligible for intense surveillance but still develop PE or SGA later. Further, due to the high NPV, UtAd qualifies as a rule-out tool for adverse outcome even in high-risk pregnancies. To standardise its interpretation, UAS with a cut-off at 2 seems to be a suitable tool for an unselected population. In case of UAS 3–4 a more intense surveillance program should be offered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 114002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525002775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The role of 2nd trimester uterine artery Doppler (UtAd) remains unclear and its implementation varies greatly. Aim of this study was to determine whether 2nd trimester UtAd interpreted with uterine artery score (UAS), a score combining PI and notching in both UtA, is useful in an unselected population in routine care.

Methods

We retrospectively calculated the UAS in 503 unselected singleton pregnancies with 2nd trimester scan at 20–24 weeks between 09/2021 and 08/2023 and later delivery in our department and analysed its relationship with perinatal outcome.

Results

With UAS > 2 there was a significant increase in adverse perinatal outcome such as hypertension/PE (OR 7.88), SGA (OR 6.82), preterm birth (OR 5.51) and placental abruption (OR 6.89). In contrast, no significant difference was found when comparing UAS 0, 1 and 2. In general, NPV for adverse outcomes were high while PPV were low. In 50 % of SGA-fetuses and 33 % of cases with hypertension/PE in UAS 3–4, the woman had no risk factor.

Conclusion

Routine 2nd trimester UtAd is useful in all pregnancies as it can identify additional patients without a pre-existing risk who generally would not be eligible for intense surveillance but still develop PE or SGA later. Further, due to the high NPV, UtAd qualifies as a rule-out tool for adverse outcome even in high-risk pregnancies. To standardise its interpretation, UAS with a cut-off at 2 seems to be a suitable tool for an unselected population. In case of UAS 3–4 a more intense surveillance program should be offered.
妊娠中期子宫动脉多普勒在瑞士常规产前护理中的作用
目的妊娠中期子宫动脉多普勒(UtAd)的作用尚不清楚,其实施方法差异较大。本研究的目的是确定子宫动脉评分(UAS)对妊娠中期UtAd的解释是否有用,子宫动脉评分结合了子宫动脉PI和子宫动脉缺口,在常规护理中对未选择的人群有用。方法回顾性计算2021年9月至2023年8月间我科503例20-24周中期非选择性单胎妊娠及后期分娩的UAS,并分析其与围产期结局的关系。结果UAS >;高血压/PE (OR 7.88)、SGA (OR 6.82)、早产(OR 5.51)和胎盘早剥(OR 6.89)等不良围产期结局显著增加。相比之下,当比较UAS 0、1和2时,没有发现显著差异。总的来说,不良结果的NPV高,而PPV低。在50%的sga胎儿和33%的UAS 3-4期高血压/PE病例中,女性没有危险因素。结论常规妊娠中期UtAd在所有妊娠中都是有用的,因为它可以识别其他没有预先存在风险的患者,这些患者通常不符合加强监测的条件,但后来仍发生PE或SGA。此外,由于高净现值,即使在高危妊娠中,UtAd也有资格作为不良后果的排除工具。为了使其解释标准化,截点为2的UAS似乎是一个适合于未选择人群的工具。在UAS 3-4的情况下,应该提供更密集的监视计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信