School-based eye health interventions for improving eye care and spectacles compliance in children in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

Gabriel Osei Anokye , Carlos Price-Sanchez , Ai Chee Yong , Majd Ali , Christopher Tate , Ronnie Graham , Ving Fai Chan
{"title":"School-based eye health interventions for improving eye care and spectacles compliance in children in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review","authors":"Gabriel Osei Anokye ,&nbsp;Carlos Price-Sanchez ,&nbsp;Ai Chee Yong ,&nbsp;Majd Ali ,&nbsp;Christopher Tate ,&nbsp;Ronnie Graham ,&nbsp;Ving Fai Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>School vision screening is a cost-effective approach to identifying eye conditions like uncorrected refractive errors among children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but challenges with spectacle compliance, procurement, and follow-up persist. This review examines school-based eye health interventions in LMICs to assess their impact on spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and referral adherence, highlighting limitations and gaps in current literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed in three databases, focusing on studies published from 1999 onward. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included studies involving school children in LMICs that assessed school-based interventions aimed at improving spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices and referral adherence. Studies conducted in universities or studies that did not perform primary data collection were excluded. Titles, abstract, full-text screening and data extraction was performed independently by two researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 108 articles identified, seven studies from five countries met inclusion criteria. Study designs included four randomised controlled trials, one cross-sectional study, one quasi-experimental study, and one qualitative prospective study. Interventions varied: five studies (71 %) included eye health education, three (43 %) focused on promotional activities, two (29 %) provided free spectacles, and one (14 %) used media campaigns and incentives. Eye health education and free spectacles were most effective in increasing spectacle compliance, while education and promotional interventions improved knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Only one study measured referral adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Eye health education, promotion, media reminders, and free spectacles improves spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and referral adherence. Further research should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in LMICs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

School vision screening is a cost-effective approach to identifying eye conditions like uncorrected refractive errors among children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but challenges with spectacle compliance, procurement, and follow-up persist. This review examines school-based eye health interventions in LMICs to assess their impact on spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and referral adherence, highlighting limitations and gaps in current literature.

Methods

A literature search was performed in three databases, focusing on studies published from 1999 onward. Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included studies involving school children in LMICs that assessed school-based interventions aimed at improving spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices and referral adherence. Studies conducted in universities or studies that did not perform primary data collection were excluded. Titles, abstract, full-text screening and data extraction was performed independently by two researchers.

Results

Of the 108 articles identified, seven studies from five countries met inclusion criteria. Study designs included four randomised controlled trials, one cross-sectional study, one quasi-experimental study, and one qualitative prospective study. Interventions varied: five studies (71 %) included eye health education, three (43 %) focused on promotional activities, two (29 %) provided free spectacles, and one (14 %) used media campaigns and incentives. Eye health education and free spectacles were most effective in increasing spectacle compliance, while education and promotional interventions improved knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Only one study measured referral adherence.

Conclusion

Eye health education, promotion, media reminders, and free spectacles improves spectacle compliance, knowledge, attitudes, practices, and referral adherence. Further research should investigate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in LMICs.

Abstract Image

改善低收入和中等收入国家儿童眼睛保健和眼镜依从性的学校眼保健干预措施:范围审查
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)中,学校视力筛查是一种具有成本效益的方法,可用于识别诸如未矫正屈光不正等眼病,但在眼镜依从性、采购和随访方面仍然存在挑战。本综述考察了低收入国家以学校为基础的眼健康干预措施,以评估其对眼镜依从性、知识、态度、实践和转诊依从性的影响,并强调了当前文献中的局限性和差距。方法对3个数据库进行文献检索,选取1999年以来发表的文献。遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,本综述纳入了涉及低收入国家学龄儿童的研究,评估了旨在改善眼镜依从性、知识、态度、实践和转诊依从性的学校干预措施。在大学进行的研究或未进行原始数据收集的研究被排除在外。题目、摘要、全文筛选和数据提取由两位研究者独立完成。结果在108篇文章中,来自5个国家的7项研究符合纳入标准。研究设计包括4项随机对照试验、1项横断面研究、1项准实验研究和1项定性前瞻性研究。干预措施各不相同:五项研究(71%)包括眼睛健康教育,三项研究(43%)侧重于促销活动,两项研究(29%)提供免费眼镜,一项研究(14%)使用媒体宣传和奖励措施。眼健康教育和免费眼镜在提高眼镜依从性方面最有效,而教育和宣传干预措施则改善了知识、态度和做法。只有一项研究测量了转诊依从性。结论眼科健康教育、宣传、媒体提醒和免费配戴可提高配戴依从性、配戴知识、配戴态度、配戴行为和转诊依从性。进一步的研究应调查这些干预措施在中低收入国家的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信