{"title":"CFD analysis of performance-based explosion protection design for battery energy storage systems (BESS)","authors":"Damilare Olugbemide , Noah Ryder","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates three explosion protection designs for a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) unit as part of a Hazard Mitigation Analysis (HMA). This is done in accordance with the requirements for explosion protection in NFPA 855, <em>Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems</em>. The BESS unit is a lithium-ion-based stationary energy storage system with nominal internal dimensions of 3.1 m (L) x 2.1 m (W) x 2.4 m (H) and a free air volume of 6.1 m<sup>3</sup>. It has four racks composed of eight modules each. Two commercially available cells—EVE and CATL—are used in the analysis to highlight the differences between cell compositions and the implications for explosion pressure and flame propagation. The analysis is performed using the FLACS (Flame Acceleration Simulator) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool developed by Gexcon.</div><div>The three designs considered are natural ventilation, combustible concentration reduction, and standard deflagration venting. For the natural ventilation method, the installed ventilation panel is designed to open at 60<sup>o</sup> (to the horizontal plane) on activation by a gas sensor located in the BESS unit. The sensor triggers the ventilation panel actuator when the concentration of the released gas inside the unit has reached a pre-determined level. The analysis determines whether the natural ventilation provided by the vent opening is sufficient to maintain the gas concentration within the unit at or below 25 % of the lower flammability limit (LFL), thereby preventing an explosion in the unit. The combustible concentration reduction method is one of the standard methods of deflagration prevention for equipment handling combustible materials discussed in NFPA 69, <em>Standard on Explosion Prevention System</em>. NFPA 69 requires that the mechanical ventilation provided for the unit should be sufficient to maintain the gas concentration within it at or below 25 % of the LFL. The third and final design is standard deflagration venting as specified in NFPA 68, <em>Standard Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting</em>. A single vent panel is provided to relieve explosion pressure in the unit. It is designed to activate at a static pressure (P<sub>stat</sub>) of 0.05 bar-g. The analysis determines whether the vent size is adequate to safely vent the unit and prevent its structural failure in the event of a deflagration. Results of large-scale testing show that for typical BESS units, panels, fasteners, and other components may begin to fail at about 0.07–0.14 bar-g. Thus, this pressure range is used as the performance criterion for this analysis.</div><div>The results of this analysis show that the second design option (the combustible concentration reduction method) provides the best outcome for explosion protection of the BESS unit. The other designs provide modest degrees of pressure relief, depending on several factors. Consequently, these design approaches can be considered individually or combined as an innovative performance-based design approach to protect BESS installations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225000700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates three explosion protection designs for a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) unit as part of a Hazard Mitigation Analysis (HMA). This is done in accordance with the requirements for explosion protection in NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems. The BESS unit is a lithium-ion-based stationary energy storage system with nominal internal dimensions of 3.1 m (L) x 2.1 m (W) x 2.4 m (H) and a free air volume of 6.1 m3. It has four racks composed of eight modules each. Two commercially available cells—EVE and CATL—are used in the analysis to highlight the differences between cell compositions and the implications for explosion pressure and flame propagation. The analysis is performed using the FLACS (Flame Acceleration Simulator) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool developed by Gexcon.
The three designs considered are natural ventilation, combustible concentration reduction, and standard deflagration venting. For the natural ventilation method, the installed ventilation panel is designed to open at 60o (to the horizontal plane) on activation by a gas sensor located in the BESS unit. The sensor triggers the ventilation panel actuator when the concentration of the released gas inside the unit has reached a pre-determined level. The analysis determines whether the natural ventilation provided by the vent opening is sufficient to maintain the gas concentration within the unit at or below 25 % of the lower flammability limit (LFL), thereby preventing an explosion in the unit. The combustible concentration reduction method is one of the standard methods of deflagration prevention for equipment handling combustible materials discussed in NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention System. NFPA 69 requires that the mechanical ventilation provided for the unit should be sufficient to maintain the gas concentration within it at or below 25 % of the LFL. The third and final design is standard deflagration venting as specified in NFPA 68, Standard Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting. A single vent panel is provided to relieve explosion pressure in the unit. It is designed to activate at a static pressure (Pstat) of 0.05 bar-g. The analysis determines whether the vent size is adequate to safely vent the unit and prevent its structural failure in the event of a deflagration. Results of large-scale testing show that for typical BESS units, panels, fasteners, and other components may begin to fail at about 0.07–0.14 bar-g. Thus, this pressure range is used as the performance criterion for this analysis.
The results of this analysis show that the second design option (the combustible concentration reduction method) provides the best outcome for explosion protection of the BESS unit. The other designs provide modest degrees of pressure relief, depending on several factors. Consequently, these design approaches can be considered individually or combined as an innovative performance-based design approach to protect BESS installations.
本研究评估了电池储能系统(BESS)单元的三种防爆设计,作为危害缓解分析(HMA)的一部分。这是按照NFPA 855《固定式储能系统安装标准》中的防爆要求完成的。BESS单元是一种基于锂离子的固定储能系统,标称内部尺寸为3.1 m (L) x 2.1 m (W) x 2.4 m (H),自由风量为6.1 m3。它有四个机架,每个机架由八个模块组成。在分析中使用了两种市售的细胞- eve和catl,以突出细胞成分之间的差异以及爆炸压力和火焰传播的影响。分析使用Gexcon开发的FLACS(火焰加速模拟器)计算流体动力学(CFD)工具进行。考虑的三种设计是自然通风,可燃物浓度降低和标准爆燃通风。对于自然通风方法,安装的通风面板被设计为在BESS单元中的气体传感器激活时在600度(对水平面)打开。当机组内释放的气体浓度达到预定水平时,传感器触发通风面板执行器。分析确定排气口提供的自然通风是否足以维持机组内的气体浓度等于或低于可燃性下限(LFL)的25%,从而防止机组爆炸。可燃物浓度降低法是NFPA 69《防爆系统标准》中讨论的可燃物处理设备防爆燃的标准方法之一。NFPA 69要求为机组提供的机械通风应足以使其内部的气体浓度保持在最低限度的25%或以下。第三种也是最后一种设计是按照NFPA 68《爆燃通风标准防爆》中规定的标准爆燃通风。提供了一个单一的排气面板,以减轻机组内的爆炸压力。它被设计为在0.05 bar-g的静压(Pstat)下激活。分析确定排气口尺寸是否足以安全排气,并防止其在爆燃事件中发生结构故障。大规模测试结果表明,对于典型的BESS单元,面板,紧固件和其他部件可能在0.07-0.14 bar-g左右开始失效。因此,此压力范围用作本分析的性能标准。分析结果表明,第二种设计方案(降低可燃物浓度法)对BESS装置的防爆效果最好。其他设计提供适度的压力释放,取决于几个因素。因此,这些设计方法可以单独考虑,也可以组合为一种创新的基于性能的设计方法,以保护BESS装置。
期刊介绍:
Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.