Exploring paradoxical tensions in scaling circular business models within the textile and clothing industry

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mohammadreza Dehghannejad , Rudrajeet Pal , Kanchana Dissanayake , Erik Sandberg
{"title":"Exploring paradoxical tensions in scaling circular business models within the textile and clothing industry","authors":"Mohammadreza Dehghannejad ,&nbsp;Rudrajeet Pal ,&nbsp;Kanchana Dissanayake ,&nbsp;Erik Sandberg","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Textile and Clothing (T&amp;C) industry is increasingly adopting circular business models (CBMs) to promote sustainable production and consumption. However, scaling CBMs within this sector remains challenging, mainly due to conflicts in organizational objectives, product designs, and value chain structures, resulting in paradoxical tensions (PTs). The purpose of this study is to explore PTs that hinder the scaling of CBMs in the T&amp;C industry. The methodology adopted a two-stage approach: first, through a critical literature review, seven key PT categories affecting CBM scaling were identified, and secondly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with T&amp;C industry actors for in-depth exploration. By applying paradox theory, this study revealed that PTs are more prevalent at the product and process levels. At the product level, PTs impacted scaling CBMs both within inner loops (repair and reuse) and outer loops (recycling), driven by socio-environmental and economic conflicts, classified as performing paradoxes. Scaling recycling is hindered due to trade-offs in technology selection for higher market uptake, lack of infrastructure, and challenges in choosing between local and global value chains, classified as organizing PTs. Our findings emphasize the importance of inter-class organizing-performing paradoxes, which obstruct the scaling of sequential loops like reuse-recycling. Furthermore, implicit belonging and learning PTs became apparent alongside other paradoxes, such as performing-belonging and organizing-learning. While belonging PTs arose at the stakeholder level due to identity tensions, learning PTs stemmed from insufficient data, knowledge, and technology. Based on the findings, this study contributed to developing four propositions explaining the impact of PTs in scaling T&amp;C CBMs. These findings provide valuable insights for T&amp;C actors to strategically plan and scale CBMs while understanding and navigating PTs. This is of crucial significance for policymakers in formulating effective policies supporting the scaling of CBMs within the T&amp;C industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 579-592"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092500096X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Textile and Clothing (T&C) industry is increasingly adopting circular business models (CBMs) to promote sustainable production and consumption. However, scaling CBMs within this sector remains challenging, mainly due to conflicts in organizational objectives, product designs, and value chain structures, resulting in paradoxical tensions (PTs). The purpose of this study is to explore PTs that hinder the scaling of CBMs in the T&C industry. The methodology adopted a two-stage approach: first, through a critical literature review, seven key PT categories affecting CBM scaling were identified, and secondly, semi-structured interviews were conducted with T&C industry actors for in-depth exploration. By applying paradox theory, this study revealed that PTs are more prevalent at the product and process levels. At the product level, PTs impacted scaling CBMs both within inner loops (repair and reuse) and outer loops (recycling), driven by socio-environmental and economic conflicts, classified as performing paradoxes. Scaling recycling is hindered due to trade-offs in technology selection for higher market uptake, lack of infrastructure, and challenges in choosing between local and global value chains, classified as organizing PTs. Our findings emphasize the importance of inter-class organizing-performing paradoxes, which obstruct the scaling of sequential loops like reuse-recycling. Furthermore, implicit belonging and learning PTs became apparent alongside other paradoxes, such as performing-belonging and organizing-learning. While belonging PTs arose at the stakeholder level due to identity tensions, learning PTs stemmed from insufficient data, knowledge, and technology. Based on the findings, this study contributed to developing four propositions explaining the impact of PTs in scaling T&C CBMs. These findings provide valuable insights for T&C actors to strategically plan and scale CBMs while understanding and navigating PTs. This is of crucial significance for policymakers in formulating effective policies supporting the scaling of CBMs within the T&C industry.
探索纺织和服装行业循环商业模式中矛盾的紧张关系
纺织和服装(T&;C)行业越来越多地采用循环商业模式(CBMs)来促进可持续生产和消费。然而,在该领域扩展CBMs仍然具有挑战性,主要是由于组织目标、产品设计和价值链结构的冲突,导致矛盾的紧张关系(PTs)。本研究的目的是探讨在医药行业中阻碍信任管理规模扩大的PTs。该方法采用两阶段方法:首先,通过批判性文献综述,确定影响CBM规模的七个关键PT类别;其次,与T&;C行业参与者进行半结构化访谈,进行深入探索。运用悖论理论,本研究揭示了PTs在产品和过程层面更为普遍。在产品层面,PTs在社会环境和经济冲突的驱动下,影响了内部循环(修复和再利用)和外部循环(回收)内的CBMs规模,被归类为执行悖论。由于在技术选择上的权衡、基础设施的缺乏以及在本地和全球价值链之间进行选择的挑战(归类为组织PTs),阻碍了回收规模的扩大。我们的研究结果强调了跨阶层组织-执行悖论的重要性,它阻碍了重复利用-再循环等顺序循环的扩展。此外,内隐归属和学习型PTs与其他悖论(如绩效归属和组织学习)一起变得明显。归属PTs源于利益相关者的身份紧张,而学习PTs源于数据、知识和技术的不足。基于这些发现,本研究提出了四个命题来解释PTs对扩展T&;C CBMs的影响。这些发现为技术人员在理解和导航PTs的同时战略性地规划和扩展cbm提供了有价值的见解。这对于政策制定者制定有效的政策,支持在医药行业扩大信任措施规模具有至关重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信