Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Shabeen Asfar Basha , Ramzi Benkraiem , Hamdi Ben-Nasr , Abdullah-Al Masum
{"title":"Does political risk exacerbate climate risk? Firm-level evidence","authors":"Shabeen Asfar Basha ,&nbsp;Ramzi Benkraiem ,&nbsp;Hamdi Ben-Nasr ,&nbsp;Abdullah-Al Masum","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using machine-learning-based measures for political and climate risks derived from corporate conference calls, we discover a link between the two in a large sample of US firms from 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that firms facing higher political risk are more susceptible to climate risk. Additionally, we find that a firm's emitter category industry classification and exposure to environmental litigation can exacerbate this situation, while managerial ability helps reduce the impact. Furthermore, political lobbying and donations effectively check corporate climate risk, but only under non-partisan conditions. Importantly, our findings are robust to concerns of reverse causality, sample selection bias, and measurement errors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 104282"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925003692","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using machine-learning-based measures for political and climate risks derived from corporate conference calls, we discover a link between the two in a large sample of US firms from 2002 to 2021. Our findings suggest that firms facing higher political risk are more susceptible to climate risk. Additionally, we find that a firm's emitter category industry classification and exposure to environmental litigation can exacerbate this situation, while managerial ability helps reduce the impact. Furthermore, political lobbying and donations effectively check corporate climate risk, but only under non-partisan conditions. Importantly, our findings are robust to concerns of reverse causality, sample selection bias, and measurement errors.
政治风险会加剧气候风险吗?公司级的证据
我们使用基于机器学习的方法来衡量企业电话会议带来的政治和气候风险,在2002年至2021年的大量美国公司样本中发现了两者之间的联系。我们的研究结果表明,面临较高政治风险的企业更容易受到气候风险的影响。此外,我们发现企业的排放类别、行业分类和面临环境诉讼会加剧这种情况,而管理能力有助于减少这种影响。此外,政治游说和捐赠有效地检查了企业的气候风险,但只有在无党派的条件下。重要的是,我们的研究结果对反向因果关系、样本选择偏差和测量误差的担忧是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信