A comparison of cognitive and health assessment tools used in a dementia prevention and risk management program for urban-dwelling older aboriginal Australians (DAMPAA)

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zoë Hyde , Carmela Pestell , Lynette Yappo , Glennette Dowden , Alex Lalovic , Lesley Markey , Michael Bynder , Emma-Jane Hunt , Dawn Bessarab , Kay Cox , Leon Flicker , Dina LoGiudice , Keith D. Hill , Sandra Thompson , Aaron Basile , Kate Smith
{"title":"A comparison of cognitive and health assessment tools used in a dementia prevention and risk management program for urban-dwelling older aboriginal Australians (DAMPAA)","authors":"Zoë Hyde ,&nbsp;Carmela Pestell ,&nbsp;Lynette Yappo ,&nbsp;Glennette Dowden ,&nbsp;Alex Lalovic ,&nbsp;Lesley Markey ,&nbsp;Michael Bynder ,&nbsp;Emma-Jane Hunt ,&nbsp;Dawn Bessarab ,&nbsp;Kay Cox ,&nbsp;Leon Flicker ,&nbsp;Dina LoGiudice ,&nbsp;Keith D. Hill ,&nbsp;Sandra Thompson ,&nbsp;Aaron Basile ,&nbsp;Kate Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In partnership with Aboriginal Elders and Aboriginal community-controlled organisations, we developed a dementia risk management and prevention program for Aboriginal Australians aged ≥45 years. In this study, we report neuropsychological assessment data for people who underwent eligibility screening and baseline assessment and explore associations between the cognitive assessment tools used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty Aboriginal people living in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia without known dementia were assessed with the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment dementia screening tool (KICA-Cog) and a battery of standard neuropsychological tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants were aged 45–80 years (mean 63.5; standard deviation [SD] 9.4 years). Eleven participants (22.0 %) were male and 39 (78.0 %) were female. Of 49 participants with complete data, 13 (26.5 %) had a GAD-7 score indicating a possible anxiety disorder and 20 (40.8 %) had a KICA-Dep score indicating possible depression. All participants were screened with the KICA-Cog and 44–49 were screened with the other tests. The mean KICA-Cog score was 37.2 (SD 1.7; range: 33–39) and the mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score was 22.2 (SD 4.5; range: 13–30). There were moderate correlations between the KICA-Cog and MoCA, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (oral version), and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test total immediate recall and delayed recall scores. There were weak or no correlations between the KICA-Cog and other cognitive assessment tools. Four participants had previously been told they had cognitive impairment. The KICA-Cog and MoCA scores for these participants were 37.0 (SD 2.2; range: 34–39) and 18.8 (SD 1.5; range: 17–20), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>A high prevalence of possible depression and anxiety suggest mental health support may be required for people participating in dementia prevention programs. The KICA-Cog is the only valid screening tool for dementia in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but its clinical utility could potentially be improved to better detect mild neurocognitive disorder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In partnership with Aboriginal Elders and Aboriginal community-controlled organisations, we developed a dementia risk management and prevention program for Aboriginal Australians aged ≥45 years. In this study, we report neuropsychological assessment data for people who underwent eligibility screening and baseline assessment and explore associations between the cognitive assessment tools used.

Methods

Fifty Aboriginal people living in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia without known dementia were assessed with the Kimberley Indigenous Cognitive Assessment dementia screening tool (KICA-Cog) and a battery of standard neuropsychological tests.

Results

Participants were aged 45–80 years (mean 63.5; standard deviation [SD] 9.4 years). Eleven participants (22.0 %) were male and 39 (78.0 %) were female. Of 49 participants with complete data, 13 (26.5 %) had a GAD-7 score indicating a possible anxiety disorder and 20 (40.8 %) had a KICA-Dep score indicating possible depression. All participants were screened with the KICA-Cog and 44–49 were screened with the other tests. The mean KICA-Cog score was 37.2 (SD 1.7; range: 33–39) and the mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score was 22.2 (SD 4.5; range: 13–30). There were moderate correlations between the KICA-Cog and MoCA, Symbol Digit Modalities Test (oral version), and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test total immediate recall and delayed recall scores. There were weak or no correlations between the KICA-Cog and other cognitive assessment tools. Four participants had previously been told they had cognitive impairment. The KICA-Cog and MoCA scores for these participants were 37.0 (SD 2.2; range: 34–39) and 18.8 (SD 1.5; range: 17–20), respectively.

Discussion

A high prevalence of possible depression and anxiety suggest mental health support may be required for people participating in dementia prevention programs. The KICA-Cog is the only valid screening tool for dementia in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, but its clinical utility could potentially be improved to better detect mild neurocognitive disorder.
在城市居住的澳大利亚老年土著居民痴呆症预防和风险管理项目中使用的认知和健康评估工具的比较
与土著长老和土著社区控制的组织合作,我们为年龄≥45岁的澳大利亚土著制定了痴呆症风险管理和预防计划。在这项研究中,我们报告了接受资格筛选和基线评估的人的神经心理学评估数据,并探讨了所使用的认知评估工具之间的关联。方法采用金伯利土著认知评估痴呆筛查工具(KICA-Cog)和一系列标准神经心理测试对50名居住在西澳大利亚州珀斯市区的未患痴呆症的土著居民进行评估。结果参与者年龄45 ~ 80岁,平均63.5岁;标准差[SD] 9.4年)。其中男性11人(22.0%),女性39人(78.0%)。在49名数据完整的参与者中,13名(26.5%)的GAD-7评分表明可能存在焦虑症,20名(40.8%)的KICA-Dep评分表明可能存在抑郁症。所有参与者都接受了KICA-Cog测试,44-49人接受了其他测试。KICA-Cog平均评分为37.2 (SD 1.7;范围:33-39),蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)平均评分为22.2分(SD 4.5;范围:13-30)。KICA-Cog与MoCA、符号数字模态测验(口语)和Hopkins语言学习测验的总即时回忆和延迟回忆得分之间存在中度相关。KICA-Cog与其他认知评估工具之间存在弱相关性或无相关性。四名参与者之前被告知他们有认知障碍。这些参与者的KICA-Cog和MoCA得分为37.0 (SD 2.2;范围:34-39)和18.8 (SD 1.5;范围:17-20)。抑郁症和焦虑症的高患病率表明,参加痴呆症预防计划的人可能需要心理健康支持。KICA-Cog是原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民中唯一有效的痴呆症筛查工具,但其临床应用可能会改善,以更好地检测轻度神经认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信