Radical rural place-making? Agricultural grassroots initiatives in the everyday negotiation of the European countryside

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Julia Spanier
{"title":"Radical rural place-making? Agricultural grassroots initiatives in the everyday negotiation of the European countryside","authors":"Julia Spanier","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the context of capitalist and conservative renderings of European countrysides, ‘radical rural’ initiatives (Halfacree, 2007) have received increasing attention. Agricultural grassroots initiatives (AGIs), although acknowledged for their contribution to post-capitalist agri-food systems, have rarely been considered for their broader performances of radical ruralities. This paper provides an examination of the role of AGIs in remaking rural places beyond agricultural change. It draws on a conceptual framework that centres on <em>constructing</em>, <em>inheriting,</em> and <em>negotiating</em> as key processes in place-making. Through this framework, the paper explores two contrasting community-supported agriculture (CSA) initiatives in East and Southwest rural Germany. These case studies show that AGIs can be agents of more-than-agricultural change in rural communities: they can promote rural commons, create learning opportunities for post-capitalist thinking, create opportunities for the encounter of difference, and may even foster networks of rural leftist and antifascist politics. At the same time, they illustrate how not all AGIs will be radical, nor intentional, rural place-makers and highlight the key role of more and less positively disposed rural neighbours. The paper thus demonstrates the importance of studying radical rural initiatives beyond the internal characteristics of their ‘islands’. The making of radical ruralities will always happen in everyday negotiations with other rural place-makers, shaped by the histories and socio-material fabrics of specific rural places.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103676"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of capitalist and conservative renderings of European countrysides, ‘radical rural’ initiatives (Halfacree, 2007) have received increasing attention. Agricultural grassroots initiatives (AGIs), although acknowledged for their contribution to post-capitalist agri-food systems, have rarely been considered for their broader performances of radical ruralities. This paper provides an examination of the role of AGIs in remaking rural places beyond agricultural change. It draws on a conceptual framework that centres on constructing, inheriting, and negotiating as key processes in place-making. Through this framework, the paper explores two contrasting community-supported agriculture (CSA) initiatives in East and Southwest rural Germany. These case studies show that AGIs can be agents of more-than-agricultural change in rural communities: they can promote rural commons, create learning opportunities for post-capitalist thinking, create opportunities for the encounter of difference, and may even foster networks of rural leftist and antifascist politics. At the same time, they illustrate how not all AGIs will be radical, nor intentional, rural place-makers and highlight the key role of more and less positively disposed rural neighbours. The paper thus demonstrates the importance of studying radical rural initiatives beyond the internal characteristics of their ‘islands’. The making of radical ruralities will always happen in everyday negotiations with other rural place-makers, shaped by the histories and socio-material fabrics of specific rural places.
激进的农村地方建设?欧洲农村日常谈判中的农业基层倡议
在资本主义和保守主义对欧洲农村的描述背景下,“激进的农村”倡议(Halfacree, 2007)受到了越来越多的关注。农业基层倡议(AGIs)虽然因其对后资本主义农业粮食系统的贡献而得到承认,但很少因其激进农村的更广泛表现而被考虑。本文考察了农业生产者在农业变革之外重塑农村的作用。它借鉴了一个概念框架,以建设、继承和谈判为中心,作为地方制定的关键过程。通过这一框架,本文探讨了德国东部和西南部农村两种截然不同的社区支持农业(CSA)举措。这些案例研究表明,农业生产者协会不仅仅是农村社区农业变革的推动者:它们可以促进农村公地,为后资本主义思想创造学习机会,为差异相遇创造机会,甚至可能培育农村左翼和反法西斯政治网络。与此同时,它们说明,并非所有农业生产者都将是激进的,也不是有意的农村地方制定者,并突出了多多少少倾向于积极的农村邻居的关键作用。因此,本文证明了研究激进的农村倡议超越其“岛屿”的内部特征的重要性。激进乡村的形成总是发生在与其他农村地方制造者的日常谈判中,这些地方制造者受到特定农村地区的历史和社会物质结构的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信