A multi-attribute decision-making method of cascade reservoir joint scheduling schemes considering water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy in the Yellow River Basin

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Donglin Li , Jieyu Li , Yuanjian Wang , Enhui Jiang , Wanjie Zhao , Gang Liu , Zhifeng Yang
{"title":"A multi-attribute decision-making method of cascade reservoir joint scheduling schemes considering water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy in the Yellow River Basin","authors":"Donglin Li ,&nbsp;Jieyu Li ,&nbsp;Yuanjian Wang ,&nbsp;Enhui Jiang ,&nbsp;Wanjie Zhao ,&nbsp;Gang Liu ,&nbsp;Zhifeng Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multi-attribute decision making for reservoir scheduling plays a crucial role in promoting the sustainable development of basins, requiring a well-structured evaluation index system and an efficient decision-making method to facilitate scientific scheduling. After obtaining Pareto solutions for the multi-objective scheduling model of cascade reservoirs, a multidimensional evaluation index system encompassing the water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy from a basin system perspective was constructed. A multi-attribute decision-making method based on the modified cumulative prospect theory (MCPT) was then proposed, enabling the evaluation of both single and multiple reservoirs while also supporting scheduling program decisions for various scenarios. The MCPT was applied to the joint scheduling decision making of the Sanmenxia-Xiaolangdi cascade reservoir for multiple typical years in the Yellow River Basin. The results indicated a strong competition between sediment discharge and power generation targets, whereas ecological and power generation targets exhibited a weaker competition. Furthermore, the range and distribution characteristics of the modified whole prospect value (MWPV) varied among the three typical years with sediment discharge, power generation, and ecological water scarcity rate contributing the most significantly to MWPV. The optimal scheduling schemes for abundant, normal, and dry water years were identified as S136, S98, and S345, respectively, all aligned with actual scheduling practices. Compared with conventional decision-making methods, MCPT demonstrated superior sensitivity and suitability for scenarios that require the selection of numerous schemes. These findings offer valuable insights into the coordinated development of water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy within the watershed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"660 ","pages":"Article 133393"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425007310","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-attribute decision making for reservoir scheduling plays a crucial role in promoting the sustainable development of basins, requiring a well-structured evaluation index system and an efficient decision-making method to facilitate scientific scheduling. After obtaining Pareto solutions for the multi-objective scheduling model of cascade reservoirs, a multidimensional evaluation index system encompassing the water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy from a basin system perspective was constructed. A multi-attribute decision-making method based on the modified cumulative prospect theory (MCPT) was then proposed, enabling the evaluation of both single and multiple reservoirs while also supporting scheduling program decisions for various scenarios. The MCPT was applied to the joint scheduling decision making of the Sanmenxia-Xiaolangdi cascade reservoir for multiple typical years in the Yellow River Basin. The results indicated a strong competition between sediment discharge and power generation targets, whereas ecological and power generation targets exhibited a weaker competition. Furthermore, the range and distribution characteristics of the modified whole prospect value (MWPV) varied among the three typical years with sediment discharge, power generation, and ecological water scarcity rate contributing the most significantly to MWPV. The optimal scheduling schemes for abundant, normal, and dry water years were identified as S136, S98, and S345, respectively, all aligned with actual scheduling practices. Compared with conventional decision-making methods, MCPT demonstrated superior sensitivity and suitability for scenarios that require the selection of numerous schemes. These findings offer valuable insights into the coordinated development of water–sediment, eco-environment, and socio-economy within the watershed.
考虑水沙、生态环境和社会经济的黄河流域梯级水库联合调度方案多属性决策方法
水库调度多属性决策对促进流域可持续发展具有至关重要的作用,需要构建结构合理的评价指标体系和高效的决策方法,便于科学调度。在得到梯级水库多目标调度模型的Pareto解的基础上,构建了流域系统视角下包含水沙、生态环境和社会经济的多维评价指标体系。在此基础上,提出了一种基于修正累积远景理论(MCPT)的多属性决策方法,既能对单个油藏和多个油藏进行评价,又能支持不同情景下的调度方案决策。将MCPT方法应用于黄河流域三门峡-小浪底梯级水库多个典型年的联合调度决策。结果表明,排沙目标与发电目标之间存在较强的竞争,生态目标与发电目标之间存在较弱的竞争。修正整体前景值(MWPV)的范围和分布特征在3个典型年份之间存在差异,其中输沙量、发电量和生态缺水率对MWPV的贡献最大。丰水年、正常年和干旱年的最佳调度方案分别为S136、S98和S345,均与实际调度实践一致。与传统的决策方法相比,MCPT在需要选择多个方案的情况下表现出更高的灵敏度和适用性。研究结果对流域水沙、生态环境和社会经济的协调发展具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信