Brian D. Christens , Megan L. McCormick, Joshua Wolf
{"title":"Understanding and promoting nature connectedness: A human ecological perspective","authors":"Brian D. Christens , Megan L. McCormick, Joshua Wolf","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People's subjective sense of their relationship with nature – or nature connectedness – is consistently found to relate to both well-being and pro-environmental values and behaviors. Yet human perceptions of their relationships with the rest of nature are complex and, in many cases, reflect cultural beliefs and historical legacies. In this paper we identify a tension within the research literature on nature connectedness and associated efforts to understand, measure, and promote nature connectedness. The tension is between what we describe as (1.) human exceptionalist perspectives, which envision nature as the absence of humans, and (2.) human ecological perspectives, which understand humans as part of nature. We offer three main interrelated recommendations for a more concertedly human ecological perspective: (1.) to move away from a focus on exposure to nature toward a greater emphasis on engagement with nature, (2.) to learn more about the positive associations between feeling connected with nature and feelings of connection with other collectivities (e.g., sense of community), and (3.) to emphasize everyday engagement with nature in specific nearby places, and the associations between nature connectedness and feeling connected to place (e.g., place attachment/sense of place). Our aim is to enhance clarity and specificity about the concept of nature connectedness, which may improve efforts to promote it and realize its associated benefits to humans, non-humans, and their shared ecologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 102046"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25000594","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People's subjective sense of their relationship with nature – or nature connectedness – is consistently found to relate to both well-being and pro-environmental values and behaviors. Yet human perceptions of their relationships with the rest of nature are complex and, in many cases, reflect cultural beliefs and historical legacies. In this paper we identify a tension within the research literature on nature connectedness and associated efforts to understand, measure, and promote nature connectedness. The tension is between what we describe as (1.) human exceptionalist perspectives, which envision nature as the absence of humans, and (2.) human ecological perspectives, which understand humans as part of nature. We offer three main interrelated recommendations for a more concertedly human ecological perspective: (1.) to move away from a focus on exposure to nature toward a greater emphasis on engagement with nature, (2.) to learn more about the positive associations between feeling connected with nature and feelings of connection with other collectivities (e.g., sense of community), and (3.) to emphasize everyday engagement with nature in specific nearby places, and the associations between nature connectedness and feeling connected to place (e.g., place attachment/sense of place). Our aim is to enhance clarity and specificity about the concept of nature connectedness, which may improve efforts to promote it and realize its associated benefits to humans, non-humans, and their shared ecologies.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology