Application of new approach methodologies for nonclinical safety assessment of drug candidates

Mario Beilmann, Karissa Adkins, Harrie C. M. Boonen, Philip Hewitt, Wenyue Hu, Robert Mader, Susanne Moore, Payal Rana, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Remi Villenave, Terry van Vleet
{"title":"Application of new approach methodologies for nonclinical safety assessment of drug candidates","authors":"Mario Beilmann, Karissa Adkins, Harrie C. M. Boonen, Philip Hewitt, Wenyue Hu, Robert Mader, Susanne Moore, Payal Rana, Thomas Steger-Hartmann, Remi Villenave, Terry van Vleet","doi":"10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and advances with in vitro testing systems have prompted revisions in regulatory guidelines and inspired dedicated in vitro/ex vivo studies for nonclinical safety assessment. This Review by a safety reflection initiative subgroup of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)/Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) summarizes the current state and potential application of in vitro studies using human-derived material for safety assessment in drug development. It focuses on case studies from recent projects in which animal models alone proved to be limited or inadequate for safety testing. It further highlights four categories of drug candidates for which alternative in vitro approaches are applicable and discusses progress in using in vitro testing solutions for safety assessment in these categories. Finally, the article highlights new risk assessment strategies, initiatives and consortia promoting the advancement of NAMs. This collective work is meant to encourage the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessment, which should ultimately result in reduced animal testing for drug development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18847,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-025-01182-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of new approach methodologies (NAMs) and advances with in vitro testing systems have prompted revisions in regulatory guidelines and inspired dedicated in vitro/ex vivo studies for nonclinical safety assessment. This Review by a safety reflection initiative subgroup of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)/Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) summarizes the current state and potential application of in vitro studies using human-derived material for safety assessment in drug development. It focuses on case studies from recent projects in which animal models alone proved to be limited or inadequate for safety testing. It further highlights four categories of drug candidates for which alternative in vitro approaches are applicable and discusses progress in using in vitro testing solutions for safety assessment in these categories. Finally, the article highlights new risk assessment strategies, initiatives and consortia promoting the advancement of NAMs. This collective work is meant to encourage the use of NAMs for more human-relevant safety assessment, which should ultimately result in reduced animal testing for drug development.

Abstract Image

新方法方法在候选药物非临床安全性评估中的应用
新方法方法(NAMs)的发展和体外测试系统的进步促使了监管指南的修订,并激发了用于非临床安全性评估的体外/离体研究。本综述由欧洲制药工业协会联合会(EFPIA)/临床前开发专家组(PDEG)的安全反思倡议小组撰写,总结了在药物开发中使用人源性材料进行安全性评估的体外研究的现状和潜在应用。它侧重于最近项目的案例研究,在这些项目中,单独的动物模型被证明是有限的或不足以进行安全测试。它进一步强调了四类候选药物,其中替代体外方法适用,并讨论了在这些类别中使用体外测试解决方案进行安全性评估的进展。最后,文章重点介绍了新的风险评估策略、倡议和促进NAMs发展的联盟。这项集体工作旨在鼓励使用NAMs进行更多与人类相关的安全性评估,这最终将减少用于药物开发的动物试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信