Are Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Metabolically Inflexible? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Maria Hansen, Kristine Kjær Lange, Martin Bjørn Stausholm, Flemming Dela
{"title":"Are Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Metabolically Inflexible? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Maria Hansen,&nbsp;Kristine Kjær Lange,&nbsp;Martin Bjørn Stausholm,&nbsp;Flemming Dela","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterised by insulin resistance and possibly by impaired metabolic flexibility, the latter referring to the body's ability to switch between fuel sources. This review systematically examines metabolic flexibility, measured by changes in the respiratory exchange ratio (ΔRER) during hyperinsulinaemic clamps, across lean, overweight/obese, and T2D populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive search of PubMed identified 65 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with 35 using a ~40 mU/m<sup>2</sup>/min insulin infusion rate for accurate comparisons. These studies included 985 participants: 256 lean, 497 overweight/obese, and 232 T2D individuals. The differences in ΔRER between the three groups were meta-analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Basal RER values did not significantly differ across groups, but insulin-stimulated ΔRER was higher in lean individuals compared to overweight/obese and T2D groups (ΔRER values 0.10, 0.07 and 0.07, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.037) indicating greater metabolic flexibility in the lean group. However, high statistical heterogeneity in the ΔRER within-group results (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> values: 92.3%–94.5%) suggests considerable variability among studies. A meta-regression analysis accounting for age, sex, and BMI indicated that only BMI was significantly associated with ΔRER. Factors contributing to the remaining heterogeneity likely include differences in participant characteristics (e.g., glycaemic control) and study design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The review highlights the need for standardised data presentation in metabolic studies. Overall, metabolic flexibility appears more influenced by overweight status than T2D per se, challenging the notion of a distinct metabolic inflexibility threshold for T2D.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterised by insulin resistance and possibly by impaired metabolic flexibility, the latter referring to the body's ability to switch between fuel sources. This review systematically examines metabolic flexibility, measured by changes in the respiratory exchange ratio (ΔRER) during hyperinsulinaemic clamps, across lean, overweight/obese, and T2D populations.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed identified 65 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with 35 using a ~40 mU/m2/min insulin infusion rate for accurate comparisons. These studies included 985 participants: 256 lean, 497 overweight/obese, and 232 T2D individuals. The differences in ΔRER between the three groups were meta-analysed.

Results

Basal RER values did not significantly differ across groups, but insulin-stimulated ΔRER was higher in lean individuals compared to overweight/obese and T2D groups (ΔRER values 0.10, 0.07 and 0.07, respectively; p = 0.037) indicating greater metabolic flexibility in the lean group. However, high statistical heterogeneity in the ΔRER within-group results (I2 values: 92.3%–94.5%) suggests considerable variability among studies. A meta-regression analysis accounting for age, sex, and BMI indicated that only BMI was significantly associated with ΔRER. Factors contributing to the remaining heterogeneity likely include differences in participant characteristics (e.g., glycaemic control) and study design.

Conclusions

The review highlights the need for standardised data presentation in metabolic studies. Overall, metabolic flexibility appears more influenced by overweight status than T2D per se, challenging the notion of a distinct metabolic inflexibility threshold for T2D.

Abstract Image

2型糖尿病患者代谢不灵活吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
2型糖尿病(T2D)的特征是胰岛素抵抗,可能是代谢灵活性受损,后者指的是身体在燃料来源之间切换的能力。本综述系统地研究了代谢灵活性,通过在高胰岛素钳夹期间呼吸交换率的变化(ΔRER)来测量,研究对象包括瘦、超重/肥胖和T2D人群。方法综合PubMed检索65项符合纳入标准的研究,其中35项采用~40 mU/m2/min胰岛素输注速率进行准确比较。这些研究包括985名参与者:256名瘦,497名超重/肥胖,232名糖尿病患者。对三组之间ΔRER的差异进行meta分析。结果基础内质网值各组间无显著差异,但胰岛素刺激下瘦个体的ΔRER高于超重/肥胖和T2D组(ΔRER值分别为0.10、0.07和0.07;P = 0.037),表明瘦肉组代谢灵活性更强。然而,ΔRER组内结果的高统计异质性(I2值:92.3%-94.5%)表明研究之间存在相当大的差异。考虑年龄、性别和BMI的meta回归分析表明,只有BMI与ΔRER显著相关。导致其余异质性的因素可能包括参与者特征(如血糖控制)和研究设计的差异。结论:本综述强调了代谢研究中数据表达标准化的必要性。总的来说,代谢灵活性似乎更受超重状态的影响,而不是T2D本身,挑战了T2D的独特代谢不灵活性阈值的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信