West Side Story: Regional Inter-Troop Variation in Baboon Bark-Stripping at Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique

IF 2 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Dora Biro, Jana Muschinski, Philippa Hammond, René Bobe, Marion K. Bamford, Cristian Capelli, João d’Oliveira Coelho, Rassina Farassi, Tina Lüdecke, Felipe I. Martinez, Jacinto Mathe, Maria Joana Ferreira Silva, Susana Carvalho
{"title":"West Side Story: Regional Inter-Troop Variation in Baboon Bark-Stripping at Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique","authors":"Dora Biro,&nbsp;Jana Muschinski,&nbsp;Philippa Hammond,&nbsp;René Bobe,&nbsp;Marion K. Bamford,&nbsp;Cristian Capelli,&nbsp;João d’Oliveira Coelho,&nbsp;Rassina Farassi,&nbsp;Tina Lüdecke,&nbsp;Felipe I. Martinez,&nbsp;Jacinto Mathe,&nbsp;Maria Joana Ferreira Silva,&nbsp;Susana Carvalho","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Baboons possess sophisticated physical and social cognitive abilities; hence, the lack of evidence to date of large-scale behavioral variation in these primates is puzzling. Here we studied a candidate for such variation—the stripping of bark from <i>Acacia robusta</i> trees for consumption of the sap and soft tissue underneath—in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We surveyed an area inhabited by ~60 troops of chacma baboons, recording the availability and characteristics of the target trees, as well as the presence or absence of bark-stripping at 45 habitat plots distributed across a grid covering an area of ~300 km<sup>2</sup>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Camera traps confirmed the presence of baboons at all habitat plots, and we identified regional clumping in the distribution of the behavior, a pattern consistent across two consecutive years. Proportion and mean height/width of <i>A. robusta</i> did not predict whether bark-stripping behavior was present at a given site, nor did broader ecological variables such as habitat type and distance to the nearest water source. However, stripping sites had significantly higher numbers of <i>A. robusta</i> than non-stripping sites, and within a given bark-stripping site, baboons preferred to strip taller and wider trees among those available.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The prominent geographical clustering we uncovered may have been driven by opportunity (i.e., the prevalence of <i>A. robusta</i> at a given site), but is also consistent with a possible (non-mutually exclusive) cultural interpretation. We propose avenues for future research on Gorongosa's baboons to better quantify the relative contributions of ecology, genetics, and social learning to the prevalence of bark stripping. We also briefly consider the potential relevance of baboon bark stripping to elucidating early hominin foraging strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Baboons possess sophisticated physical and social cognitive abilities; hence, the lack of evidence to date of large-scale behavioral variation in these primates is puzzling. Here we studied a candidate for such variation—the stripping of bark from Acacia robusta trees for consumption of the sap and soft tissue underneath—in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique.

Materials and Methods

We surveyed an area inhabited by ~60 troops of chacma baboons, recording the availability and characteristics of the target trees, as well as the presence or absence of bark-stripping at 45 habitat plots distributed across a grid covering an area of ~300 km2.

Results

Camera traps confirmed the presence of baboons at all habitat plots, and we identified regional clumping in the distribution of the behavior, a pattern consistent across two consecutive years. Proportion and mean height/width of A. robusta did not predict whether bark-stripping behavior was present at a given site, nor did broader ecological variables such as habitat type and distance to the nearest water source. However, stripping sites had significantly higher numbers of A. robusta than non-stripping sites, and within a given bark-stripping site, baboons preferred to strip taller and wider trees among those available.

Discussion

The prominent geographical clustering we uncovered may have been driven by opportunity (i.e., the prevalence of A. robusta at a given site), but is also consistent with a possible (non-mutually exclusive) cultural interpretation. We propose avenues for future research on Gorongosa's baboons to better quantify the relative contributions of ecology, genetics, and social learning to the prevalence of bark stripping. We also briefly consider the potential relevance of baboon bark stripping to elucidating early hominin foraging strategies.

西区故事:莫桑比克戈龙戈萨国家公园狒狒剥树皮的区域种群间变化
狒狒具有复杂的身体和社会认知能力;因此,迄今为止缺乏这些灵长类动物大规模行为变异的证据令人困惑。在这里,我们研究了这种变异的一个候选物种——莫桑比克戈龙戈萨国家公园里,为了消耗树液和树下的软组织,我们从金合欢树上剥下树皮。材料和方法我们调查了约60支chacma狒狒的栖息地,记录了目标树木的可用性和特征,以及分布在约300平方公里面积上的45个栖息地地块的树皮剥落情况。结果:相机陷阱确认了狒狒在所有栖息地的存在,并且我们在行为分布中发现了区域聚集,这种模式连续两年保持一致。罗布塔的比例和平均高/宽不能预测给定地点是否存在剥树皮行为,也不能预测更广泛的生态变量,如栖息地类型和到最近水源的距离。然而,剥树皮地点的罗布塔数量明显高于非剥树皮地点,并且在给定的剥树皮地点,狒狒倾向于剥树皮中较高和较宽的树木。我们发现的突出的地理聚类可能是由机遇驱动的(即,a . robusta在给定地点的流行),但也与可能的(非相互排斥的)文化解释相一致。我们提出了未来对戈龙戈萨狒狒的研究途径,以更好地量化生态学、遗传学和社会学习对树皮剥落流行的相对贡献。我们还简要地考虑了狒狒树皮剥离对阐明早期人类觅食策略的潜在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信