{"title":"The impact of China’s green credit policy on the innovation of manufacturing enterprises","authors":"Guanglin Sun , Qinyao Feng , Shanshan Wu , Chuanxin Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study empirically investigated the effects of green credit policies on corporate innovation in China, utilizing panel data for A-share listed manufacturing companies from 2008 to 2022. The analysis employed double-difference models, with the 2012 introduction of the <em>Green Credit Guidelines</em> treated as an exogenous shock. Green credit schemes were found to restrict innovation among more heavily-polluting enterprises. In terms of mechanisms, <em>financial constraint effects</em> outweighed the <em>Porter effect</em>, with heightened financial limitations imposed by green credit schemes driving the observed decrease in corporate innovation. Additionally, the degree of local financial development was found to strongly mediate how green credit policies impacted innovation-related investments, while government subsidies and internal investment levels exacerbated the negative effects of green credit schemes on innovation. Green credit-related declines in innovation within heavily polluting industries were exaggerated for privately owned versus state-owned enterprises. Similarly, technology-intensive enterprises, those operating in highly competitive markets, and those less-dependent on human labor also experienced greater reductions in innovation. Finally, green credit-related declines in innovation were most severe for enterprises located in the Central Region of China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100714"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study empirically investigated the effects of green credit policies on corporate innovation in China, utilizing panel data for A-share listed manufacturing companies from 2008 to 2022. The analysis employed double-difference models, with the 2012 introduction of the Green Credit Guidelines treated as an exogenous shock. Green credit schemes were found to restrict innovation among more heavily-polluting enterprises. In terms of mechanisms, financial constraint effects outweighed the Porter effect, with heightened financial limitations imposed by green credit schemes driving the observed decrease in corporate innovation. Additionally, the degree of local financial development was found to strongly mediate how green credit policies impacted innovation-related investments, while government subsidies and internal investment levels exacerbated the negative effects of green credit schemes on innovation. Green credit-related declines in innovation within heavily polluting industries were exaggerated for privately owned versus state-owned enterprises. Similarly, technology-intensive enterprises, those operating in highly competitive markets, and those less-dependent on human labor also experienced greater reductions in innovation. Finally, green credit-related declines in innovation were most severe for enterprises located in the Central Region of China.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.