The internal communication paradox: Balancing digital convenience with face-to-face satisfaction

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Ana Tkalac Verčič , Dejan Verčič
{"title":"The internal communication paradox: Balancing digital convenience with face-to-face satisfaction","authors":"Ana Tkalac Verčič ,&nbsp;Dejan Verčič","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The digital transformation in the workplace means that an increasing proportion of interactions among employees and between employees and management that historically occurred face-to-face are being conducted on-line. While this transformation may bring advantages of convenience, it may also dampen employee satisfaction with internal communication. The present study investigates how strongly digital and face-to-face interactions influence such satisfaction, and how employee attitudes towards digital technology modulate that influence. Data were collected from 104 employees at a large telecommunications company during five consecutive workdays using the diary method. Participants recorded the frequency and quality of their digital and face-to-face interactions, their levels of internal communication satisfaction, and their attitudes towards digital technology. Data were analyzed within the framework of the Media Affordances Perspective, Media Richness Theory, and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In our sample, higher frequency of communication through individual face-to-face interaction was associated with significantly greater employee satisfaction with internal communication, whereas frequency of communication through group in-person meetings, telephone calls, emails, video calls or instant messaging did not significantly affect satisfaction. Attitudes towards digital technology did not moderate the relationship between frequency of digital or face-to-face communication and satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of in-person interactions for employee satisfaction even as companies rely increasingly on digital communication channels. Organizations should balance the requirements of digital transformation against employee needs for face-to-face interactions to create and maintain engagement and satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 102587"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital transformation in the workplace means that an increasing proportion of interactions among employees and between employees and management that historically occurred face-to-face are being conducted on-line. While this transformation may bring advantages of convenience, it may also dampen employee satisfaction with internal communication. The present study investigates how strongly digital and face-to-face interactions influence such satisfaction, and how employee attitudes towards digital technology modulate that influence. Data were collected from 104 employees at a large telecommunications company during five consecutive workdays using the diary method. Participants recorded the frequency and quality of their digital and face-to-face interactions, their levels of internal communication satisfaction, and their attitudes towards digital technology. Data were analyzed within the framework of the Media Affordances Perspective, Media Richness Theory, and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In our sample, higher frequency of communication through individual face-to-face interaction was associated with significantly greater employee satisfaction with internal communication, whereas frequency of communication through group in-person meetings, telephone calls, emails, video calls or instant messaging did not significantly affect satisfaction. Attitudes towards digital technology did not moderate the relationship between frequency of digital or face-to-face communication and satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of in-person interactions for employee satisfaction even as companies rely increasingly on digital communication channels. Organizations should balance the requirements of digital transformation against employee needs for face-to-face interactions to create and maintain engagement and satisfaction.
内部沟通悖论:平衡数字便利与面对面的满意度
工作场所的数字化转型意味着员工之间以及员工与管理层之间越来越多的面对面互动正在在线进行。这种转变可能带来便利的好处,但也可能降低员工对内部沟通的满意度。本研究调查了数字和面对面互动对这种满意度的影响程度,以及员工对数字技术的态度如何调节这种影响。使用日记法对一家大型电信公司的104名员工进行了连续5个工作日的数据收集。参与者记录了他们的数字和面对面互动的频率和质量,他们的内部沟通满意度,以及他们对数字技术的态度。在媒介可视性视角、媒介丰富性理论和技术接受与使用统一理论的框架下对数据进行分析。在我们的样本中,通过个人面对面互动进行的沟通频率越高,员工对内部沟通的满意度就越高,而通过小组面对面会议、电话、电子邮件、视频通话或即时消息进行的沟通频率对满意度没有显著影响。对数字技术的态度并没有调节数字或面对面交流频率与满意度之间的关系。这些发现强调了面对面互动对员工满意度的重要性,即使公司越来越依赖数字沟通渠道。组织应该平衡数字化转型的需求和员工面对面互动的需求,以创造和保持敬业度和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信