Quality-by-design as the pharmaceutical innovation paradigm: mapping the field and proposing a conceptual framework

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Alfonso Hernandez-Vivanco , Vesna Vlaisavljevic , Laura Gonzalez-Moragas , Mónica Santana
{"title":"Quality-by-design as the pharmaceutical innovation paradigm: mapping the field and proposing a conceptual framework","authors":"Alfonso Hernandez-Vivanco ,&nbsp;Vesna Vlaisavljevic ,&nbsp;Laura Gonzalez-Moragas ,&nbsp;Mónica Santana","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quality management (QM) and innovation practices are essential for business competitiveness, yet they often conflict when striving for radical advancements within complex innovation ecosystems. Amid this debate, the concept of Quality-by-Design (QbD) remains underexplored in management literature, despite its extensive development in technical fields. Taking the case of QbD in the pharmaceutical sector, this study aims at researching into its relationship with innovation, considering the interactions within the innovation ecosystem. We perform a bibliometric study, a selective content analysis combined with an assessment of the regulatory framework and relevant examples from the industry. Using the duality of the science-push and market-pull approach as the lens of our analysis and its integration with regulatory push, we propose a conceptual framework and illustrate its application using a case study on the development of COVID-19 vaccines. We propose that regulatory agencies and multinationals play a key role in fostering the adoption of QbD. Besides, we suggest that firms benefit from QbD implementation in terms of continuous improvement and, through the latter, radical innovation. This study contributes to the literature by identifying QbD as an ecosystem-based innovation strategy that enables pursuing more radical advances. Our study also inspires a future research agenda.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 124182"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525002136","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality management (QM) and innovation practices are essential for business competitiveness, yet they often conflict when striving for radical advancements within complex innovation ecosystems. Amid this debate, the concept of Quality-by-Design (QbD) remains underexplored in management literature, despite its extensive development in technical fields. Taking the case of QbD in the pharmaceutical sector, this study aims at researching into its relationship with innovation, considering the interactions within the innovation ecosystem. We perform a bibliometric study, a selective content analysis combined with an assessment of the regulatory framework and relevant examples from the industry. Using the duality of the science-push and market-pull approach as the lens of our analysis and its integration with regulatory push, we propose a conceptual framework and illustrate its application using a case study on the development of COVID-19 vaccines. We propose that regulatory agencies and multinationals play a key role in fostering the adoption of QbD. Besides, we suggest that firms benefit from QbD implementation in terms of continuous improvement and, through the latter, radical innovation. This study contributes to the literature by identifying QbD as an ecosystem-based innovation strategy that enables pursuing more radical advances. Our study also inspires a future research agenda.
设计质量作为制药创新范式:绘制领域并提出概念框架
质量管理(QM)和创新实践对于企业竞争力至关重要,然而,在复杂的创新生态系统中,它们在争取根本性进步时经常发生冲突。在这场争论中,尽管设计质量(QbD)的概念在技术领域得到了广泛的发展,但在管理文献中仍未得到充分的探讨。本研究以制药行业的QbD为例,考虑创新生态系统内部的相互作用,研究其与创新的关系。我们进行文献计量学研究,选择性内容分析,结合监管框架和行业相关案例的评估。我们以科学推动和市场拉动的二元性方法作为分析的视角,并将其与监管推动相结合,提出了一个概念框架,并通过对COVID-19疫苗开发的案例研究说明了其应用。我们建议监管机构和跨国公司在促进采用QbD方面发挥关键作用。此外,我们建议企业从QbD的实施中受益,包括持续改进,以及通过后者的激进创新。本研究通过将QbD确定为一种基于生态系统的创新战略,从而实现更激进的进步,从而为文献做出了贡献。我们的研究也激发了未来的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信