Pursuing electric mobility in India: Regional disparities and strategic gaps in sub-national electric vehicle policies

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Roma Kandpal, Gregory Trencher
{"title":"Pursuing electric mobility in India: Regional disparities and strategic gaps in sub-national electric vehicle policies","authors":"Roma Kandpal,&nbsp;Gregory Trencher","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) are widely promoted to decarbonise road transport and improve air quality. While EV adoption is advancing in the Global North, many developing economies face steep obstacles in transitioning to electric mobility. To build knowledge of governance strategies in the Global South, this study focuses on India, a rapidly growing vehicle market. We employ a policy mapping approach to identify policy implementation trends in four critical market areas: (1) EV adoption, (2) EV production, (3) infrastructure, and (4) restrictions on Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs). Spatially, we find that policies are concentrated in economically and industrially developed regions. In terms of market areas, most policies emphasise EV adoption, with several states also supporting infrastructure development. Few jurisdictions, however, have implemented ICEV restrictions or strategically support local EV-production. The analysis of policy instruments reveals an over-reliance on economic incentives and other soft measures like planning and information campaigns. In contrast, command-and-control measures are scarce. Our study provides the first systematic assessment of India's sub-national policies promoting electric mobility. Additionally, by identifying a deficiency of regulatory measures, ICEV restrictions and strategies to encourage local EV production, findings offer important insights for policymakers in India and other developing economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104113"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962500194X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are widely promoted to decarbonise road transport and improve air quality. While EV adoption is advancing in the Global North, many developing economies face steep obstacles in transitioning to electric mobility. To build knowledge of governance strategies in the Global South, this study focuses on India, a rapidly growing vehicle market. We employ a policy mapping approach to identify policy implementation trends in four critical market areas: (1) EV adoption, (2) EV production, (3) infrastructure, and (4) restrictions on Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEVs). Spatially, we find that policies are concentrated in economically and industrially developed regions. In terms of market areas, most policies emphasise EV adoption, with several states also supporting infrastructure development. Few jurisdictions, however, have implemented ICEV restrictions or strategically support local EV-production. The analysis of policy instruments reveals an over-reliance on economic incentives and other soft measures like planning and information campaigns. In contrast, command-and-control measures are scarce. Our study provides the first systematic assessment of India's sub-national policies promoting electric mobility. Additionally, by identifying a deficiency of regulatory measures, ICEV restrictions and strategies to encourage local EV production, findings offer important insights for policymakers in India and other developing economies.
在印度追求电动交通:地方差异和地方电动汽车政策的战略差距
电动汽车(ev)被广泛推广,以减少道路运输的碳排放,改善空气质量。尽管全球北方的电动汽车普及率正在提高,但许多发展中经济体在向电动汽车过渡方面面临着巨大障碍。为了建立全球南方国家治理战略的知识,本研究将重点放在印度这个快速增长的汽车市场上。我们采用政策映射方法来确定四个关键市场领域的政策实施趋势:(1)电动汽车采用,(2)电动汽车生产,(3)基础设施,(4)对内燃机汽车(ICEVs)的限制。从空间上看,政策集中在经济和工业发达地区。就市场领域而言,大多数政策都强调电动汽车的采用,一些州还支持基础设施建设。然而,很少有司法管辖区实施电动汽车限制或在战略上支持当地电动汽车生产。对政策工具的分析表明,过度依赖经济激励和其他软措施,如规划和宣传运动。相比之下,指挥和控制措施很少。我们的研究首次系统评估了印度促进电动交通的地方政策。此外,通过确定监管措施、电动汽车限制和鼓励本地电动汽车生产战略的不足,研究结果为印度和其他发展中经济体的政策制定者提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信