{"title":"Airline network response to government policies: COVID-19 and Russian airspace closure","authors":"Maozhu Liao , Yilin Zhang , Tommy Cheung","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.04.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how airlines responded to two major external shocks: the COVID-19 pandemic and Russian airspace closure. Using monthly international schedules data from 2018 to 2024 on airline networks and government stringency measures, we apply both panel regression model based on Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model, to analyze the effects of these disruptions on key airline network measures, including mean distance, clustering coefficient, network diameter, and network efficiency. Our findings indicate that increased stringency exposure during the pandemic leads to a contraction in airline network structures, with reduced global connectivity and network efficiency. In contrast, the closure of Russian airspace forces airlines to adopt longer routes, leading to an increase in mean distances but an improvement in network efficiency as airlines optimized their rerouted operations. The dynamic analysis reveals persistence in airline network characteristics, with significant long-term effects resulting from these external shocks. These findings contribute to the existing literature on airline network resilience and highlight the need for strategic planning to address both public health and geopolitical disruptions. The study also presents important policy implications, suggesting that governments and industry stakeholders should develop frameworks for enhancing network adaptability and ensuring global connectivity in the face of future crises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 74-89"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25001684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how airlines responded to two major external shocks: the COVID-19 pandemic and Russian airspace closure. Using monthly international schedules data from 2018 to 2024 on airline networks and government stringency measures, we apply both panel regression model based on Driscoll-Kraay standard errors and panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model, to analyze the effects of these disruptions on key airline network measures, including mean distance, clustering coefficient, network diameter, and network efficiency. Our findings indicate that increased stringency exposure during the pandemic leads to a contraction in airline network structures, with reduced global connectivity and network efficiency. In contrast, the closure of Russian airspace forces airlines to adopt longer routes, leading to an increase in mean distances but an improvement in network efficiency as airlines optimized their rerouted operations. The dynamic analysis reveals persistence in airline network characteristics, with significant long-term effects resulting from these external shocks. These findings contribute to the existing literature on airline network resilience and highlight the need for strategic planning to address both public health and geopolitical disruptions. The study also presents important policy implications, suggesting that governments and industry stakeholders should develop frameworks for enhancing network adaptability and ensuring global connectivity in the face of future crises.
期刊介绍:
Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.