Properties and hydration products analysis of magnesium slag-based filling materials

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Zunqing Liu , Jingwei Gong , Haojie Ji , Xiaoling Zhong , Jun Dong , Haiwei Xie
{"title":"Properties and hydration products analysis of magnesium slag-based filling materials","authors":"Zunqing Liu ,&nbsp;Jingwei Gong ,&nbsp;Haojie Ji ,&nbsp;Xiaoling Zhong ,&nbsp;Jun Dong ,&nbsp;Haiwei Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the properties and hydration products of filling materials based on modified magnesium slag (MMS) and unmodified magnesium slag (UMS). Two types of MMS (MMS-A and MMS-B) were compared with UMS through various analyses. X-ray diffraction revealed that MMS predominantly contained β-C<sub>2</sub>S, while UMS was dominated by γ-C<sub>2</sub>S. Strength activity index tests showed superior performance of MMS, with MMS-A and MMS-B achieving 97.53 % and 89.46 % at 3 days, respectively, compared to 68.5 % for UMS. Isothermal calorimetry demonstrated that MMS-based pastes had shorter induction periods and higher heat release rates, with MMS-A reaching a peak of 0.470 mW/g at 30 hours, while UMS peaked at 0.203 mW/g at 66 hours. Compressive strength tests at 28 days yielded 8.39 MPa for MMS-A, 8.08 MPa for MMS-B, and 4.99 MPa for UMS-based pastes. Microstructural analyses, including SEM, TG-DTG, and FT-IR, confirmed denser C-S-H formation and more refined pore structures in MMS-based pastes. The minimal differences between MMS-A and MMS-B across all tests demonstrated the stability of the modification process. These findings suggest that MMS offers a promising alternative for sustainable filling materials in mining applications, effectively valorizing an industrial by-product while potentially improving backfill performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"126 ","pages":"Pages 408-417"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S111001682500609X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the properties and hydration products of filling materials based on modified magnesium slag (MMS) and unmodified magnesium slag (UMS). Two types of MMS (MMS-A and MMS-B) were compared with UMS through various analyses. X-ray diffraction revealed that MMS predominantly contained β-C2S, while UMS was dominated by γ-C2S. Strength activity index tests showed superior performance of MMS, with MMS-A and MMS-B achieving 97.53 % and 89.46 % at 3 days, respectively, compared to 68.5 % for UMS. Isothermal calorimetry demonstrated that MMS-based pastes had shorter induction periods and higher heat release rates, with MMS-A reaching a peak of 0.470 mW/g at 30 hours, while UMS peaked at 0.203 mW/g at 66 hours. Compressive strength tests at 28 days yielded 8.39 MPa for MMS-A, 8.08 MPa for MMS-B, and 4.99 MPa for UMS-based pastes. Microstructural analyses, including SEM, TG-DTG, and FT-IR, confirmed denser C-S-H formation and more refined pore structures in MMS-based pastes. The minimal differences between MMS-A and MMS-B across all tests demonstrated the stability of the modification process. These findings suggest that MMS offers a promising alternative for sustainable filling materials in mining applications, effectively valorizing an industrial by-product while potentially improving backfill performance.
镁渣基填料性能及水化产物分析
研究了改性镁渣(MMS)和未改性镁渣(UMS)填料的性能及水化产物。两种类型的MMS (MMS- a和MMS- b)通过各种分析与UMS进行比较。x射线衍射显示MMS以β-C2S为主,而UMS以γ-C2S为主。强度活性指数测试表明,MMS具有优异的性能,MMS- a和MMS- b在3天分别达到97.53 %和89.46 %,而UMS为68.5 %。等温量热法表明,MMS-A在30 小时达到峰值0.470 mW/g,而UMS在66 小时达到峰值0.203 mW/g, MMS-A的诱导时间更短,放热速率更高。在28天的抗压强度试验中,MMS-A的抗压强度为8.39 MPa, MMS-B的抗压强度为8.08 MPa, ms基膏体的抗压强度为4.99 MPa。显微结构分析,包括SEM, TG-DTG和FT-IR,证实了mms基浆料中更致密的C-S-H形成和更精细的孔隙结构。在所有测试中,MMS-A和MMS-B之间的最小差异表明了修改过程的稳定性。这些发现表明,MMS为采矿应用中的可持续充填材料提供了一个有希望的替代方案,有效地使工业副产品增值,同时潜在地改善充填性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信