Spontaneous retinal venous pulsations for evaluation of intracranial pressure after endoscopic third ventriculostomy

Jacqueline Boyle , William Miller , Andres Maldonado , Jorge Kattah
{"title":"Spontaneous retinal venous pulsations for evaluation of intracranial pressure after endoscopic third ventriculostomy","authors":"Jacqueline Boyle ,&nbsp;William Miller ,&nbsp;Andres Maldonado ,&nbsp;Jorge Kattah","doi":"10.1016/j.hmedic.2025.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate and timely diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion failure, including shunt or ventriculostomy failure, remains challenging. Classically, ophthalmologic evaluation of intracranial pressure (ICP) is based on papilledema, however, spontaneous retinal venous pulsations (SVP) may be another valuable, underutilized tool. We seek to present the case of a patient who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy with neuroophthalmological monitoring throughout her post-operative course and provide a brief literature review on the use of SVP for monitoring ICP.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>Post-operatively, our patient noted improvement of her symptoms and confirmation of successful ventriculostomy on MRI CSF flow studies. There was a monitorable, gradual return of SVP, which supports the use of SVPs as a clinical surrogate to MRI CSF flow study. Literature review suggests that SVP loss is more sensitive than papilledema for elevated ICP, though return of SVP may be delayed in patients post-operatively given CSF dynamics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on our clinical findings and literature review, SVP may be an excellent, more sensitive screening test, especially in the absence of papilledema, to evaluate for CSF diversion failure. Ophthalmologic monitoring is cost-effective and non-invasive, and clinical incorporation of SVP could reduce unnecessary testing, hospitalizations, invasive procedures, and patient discomfort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100908,"journal":{"name":"Medical Reports","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949918625000804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate and timely diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion failure, including shunt or ventriculostomy failure, remains challenging. Classically, ophthalmologic evaluation of intracranial pressure (ICP) is based on papilledema, however, spontaneous retinal venous pulsations (SVP) may be another valuable, underutilized tool. We seek to present the case of a patient who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy with neuroophthalmological monitoring throughout her post-operative course and provide a brief literature review on the use of SVP for monitoring ICP.

Case presentation

Post-operatively, our patient noted improvement of her symptoms and confirmation of successful ventriculostomy on MRI CSF flow studies. There was a monitorable, gradual return of SVP, which supports the use of SVPs as a clinical surrogate to MRI CSF flow study. Literature review suggests that SVP loss is more sensitive than papilledema for elevated ICP, though return of SVP may be delayed in patients post-operatively given CSF dynamics.

Conclusion

Based on our clinical findings and literature review, SVP may be an excellent, more sensitive screening test, especially in the absence of papilledema, to evaluate for CSF diversion failure. Ophthalmologic monitoring is cost-effective and non-invasive, and clinical incorporation of SVP could reduce unnecessary testing, hospitalizations, invasive procedures, and patient discomfort.
自发性视网膜静脉脉动对内镜下第三脑室造口术后颅内压的评估
准确和及时的诊断脑脊液(CSF)分流失败,包括分流或脑室造瘘失败,仍然具有挑战性。传统上,眼科评估颅内压(ICP)是基于乳头水肿,然而,自发视网膜静脉脉动(SVP)可能是另一个有价值的,未充分利用的工具。我们试图提出一个病例的病人谁接受内窥镜第三脑室造口术与神经眼科监测在她的术后过程中,并提供简要的文献综述使用SVP监测ICP。术后,我们的病人注意到她的症状改善,并证实脑室造口术成功的MRI脑脊液流研究。SVP可监测,逐渐恢复,这支持SVP作为MRI脑脊液血流研究的临床替代品。文献综述表明,对于颅内压升高,SVP丧失比乳头水肿更敏感,尽管考虑到脑脊液动力学,术后患者SVP的恢复可能会延迟。结论根据我们的临床发现和文献综述,SVP可能是一个优秀的,更敏感的筛选试验,特别是在没有乳头水肿的情况下,评估脑脊液转移失败。眼科监测具有成本效益和非侵入性,临床结合SVP可以减少不必要的检查、住院、侵入性手术和患者不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信