Importance of the antecedent environmental factors’ memory effects on the temporal variation of terrestrial gross primary productivity

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Weihua Liu , Lili Feng , Zhongen Niu , Yan Lv , Mengyu Zhang
{"title":"Importance of the antecedent environmental factors’ memory effects on the temporal variation of terrestrial gross primary productivity","authors":"Weihua Liu ,&nbsp;Lili Feng ,&nbsp;Zhongen Niu ,&nbsp;Yan Lv ,&nbsp;Mengyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantitative estimation of temporal variation in ecosystem productivity is crucial for assessing the stability and sustainability of ecosystem carbon sinks. However, current assessments of temporal variation of gross primary productivity (GPP) suffer from inaccuracies due to oversight of the memory effect of GPP on antecedent environmental and vegetation changes. By introducing memory effect into a time-dependent deep learning model, we investigated the responses of GPP to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors, and further simulated and analyzed the temporal trend and interannual variation of GPP at site and spatial scales. Our results indicate that (i) incorporating memory effect significantly improves the explanatory power of environmental and vegetation factors on GPP magnitude, trend, and interannual variation compared to the model ignoring memory effect; (ii) the memory effect length of GPP response to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors varies across different ecosystems, ranging from 4 to 11 months. Precipitation has a longer cumulative effect on GPP compared to temperature, shortwave radiation and VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) in most ecosystems. The impact of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) on GPP was stronger than environmental variables, emphasizing the significance of vegetation state in GPP simulation; (iii) the global terrestrial ecosystem GPP estimated by the deep learning model considering memory effect showed an increasing trend and significant interannual variation from 1983 to 2015. This study enhanced the understanding on the driving mechanisms of antecedent environmental and vegetation factors on GPP and provided a reference for modeling of carbon cycle process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 113558"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25004881","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative estimation of temporal variation in ecosystem productivity is crucial for assessing the stability and sustainability of ecosystem carbon sinks. However, current assessments of temporal variation of gross primary productivity (GPP) suffer from inaccuracies due to oversight of the memory effect of GPP on antecedent environmental and vegetation changes. By introducing memory effect into a time-dependent deep learning model, we investigated the responses of GPP to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors, and further simulated and analyzed the temporal trend and interannual variation of GPP at site and spatial scales. Our results indicate that (i) incorporating memory effect significantly improves the explanatory power of environmental and vegetation factors on GPP magnitude, trend, and interannual variation compared to the model ignoring memory effect; (ii) the memory effect length of GPP response to antecedent environmental and vegetation factors varies across different ecosystems, ranging from 4 to 11 months. Precipitation has a longer cumulative effect on GPP compared to temperature, shortwave radiation and VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) in most ecosystems. The impact of NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) on GPP was stronger than environmental variables, emphasizing the significance of vegetation state in GPP simulation; (iii) the global terrestrial ecosystem GPP estimated by the deep learning model considering memory effect showed an increasing trend and significant interannual variation from 1983 to 2015. This study enhanced the understanding on the driving mechanisms of antecedent environmental and vegetation factors on GPP and provided a reference for modeling of carbon cycle process.
前环境因子记忆效应对陆地总初级生产力时间变化的重要性
定量估算生态系统生产力的时间变化对于评估生态系统碳汇的稳定性和可持续性至关重要。然而,由于忽略了总初级生产力对环境和植被变化的记忆效应,目前对总初级生产力(GPP)的时间变化评估存在不准确性。通过将记忆效应引入时间依赖的深度学习模型,研究了GPP对前因环境因子和植被因子的响应,并进一步模拟和分析了GPP在站点和空间尺度上的时间趋势和年际变化。结果表明:(1)与不考虑记忆效应的模型相比,考虑记忆效应的模型显著提高了环境因子和植被因子对GPP大小、趋势和年际变化的解释能力;(2)不同生态系统GPP对前环境和植被因子响应的记忆效应长度不同,从4个月到11个月不等。在大多数生态系统中,与温度、短波辐射和VPD相比,降水对GPP的累积效应更长。NDVI(归一化植被指数)对GPP的影响强于环境变量,强调了植被状态在GPP模拟中的重要性;(3) 1983 ~ 2015年,考虑记忆效应的深度学习模型估算的全球陆地生态系统GPP呈增加趋势,且年际变化显著。该研究增强了对GPP的前环境因子和植被因子驱动机制的认识,并为碳循环过程的建模提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信