Gelatin versus chitosan as packing materials in endoscopic myringoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Vanessa Hui En Chen , Linette Shu Hwei Tan
{"title":"Gelatin versus chitosan as packing materials in endoscopic myringoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media","authors":"Vanessa Hui En Chen ,&nbsp;Linette Shu Hwei Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>There is a lack of literature studying the impact of various middle ear packing materials on the outcomes of myringoplasty. Absorbable gelatin sponge is commonly used, though it has been reported to induce middle ear fibrosis or adhesions. Chitosan-based sponge has useful properties including hemostasis, anti-adhesion and antimicrobial activity, potentially making it useful for supporting the graft in myringoplasty. This study compares graft success when chitosan and gelatin are used as packing materials for endoscopic myringoplasty.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An audit was performed of all patients who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media under the Otolaryngology department of Ng Teng Fong General Hospital between June 2021 and March 2024. Patients were followed up at least 3 months after surgery. Graft success was defined as the presence of an intact graft without perforation at the end of 3 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>91 patients were analyzed. Gelatin and chitosan were used in 40 and 51 patients respectively. The overall graft success rate of the 91 cases was 79.1 %(<em>n</em> = 72). Tragal perichondrium was most commonly used(46.1 %, <em>n</em> = 42/91), with a success rate of 80.9 %(<em>n</em> = 34/42). The differences in graft success rates among the various graft types and across perforation sizes were not statistically significant.(<em>p</em> = 0.129 and <em>p</em> = 0.399 respectively) There was no significant difference in the success rate between the chitosan group(80.4 %, <em>n</em> = 41/51) and the gelatin group(77.5 %, <em>n</em> = 31/40).(<em>p</em> = 0.736).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Chitosan-based packing affords at least equivalent success when compared to gelatin-based packing for endoscopic myringoplasty. It should be considered as a competitive alternative given its other benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 104654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

There is a lack of literature studying the impact of various middle ear packing materials on the outcomes of myringoplasty. Absorbable gelatin sponge is commonly used, though it has been reported to induce middle ear fibrosis or adhesions. Chitosan-based sponge has useful properties including hemostasis, anti-adhesion and antimicrobial activity, potentially making it useful for supporting the graft in myringoplasty. This study compares graft success when chitosan and gelatin are used as packing materials for endoscopic myringoplasty.

Methods

An audit was performed of all patients who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media under the Otolaryngology department of Ng Teng Fong General Hospital between June 2021 and March 2024. Patients were followed up at least 3 months after surgery. Graft success was defined as the presence of an intact graft without perforation at the end of 3 months.

Results

91 patients were analyzed. Gelatin and chitosan were used in 40 and 51 patients respectively. The overall graft success rate of the 91 cases was 79.1 %(n = 72). Tragal perichondrium was most commonly used(46.1 %, n = 42/91), with a success rate of 80.9 %(n = 34/42). The differences in graft success rates among the various graft types and across perforation sizes were not statistically significant.(p = 0.129 and p = 0.399 respectively) There was no significant difference in the success rate between the chitosan group(80.4 %, n = 41/51) and the gelatin group(77.5 %, n = 31/40).(p = 0.736).

Conclusion

Chitosan-based packing affords at least equivalent success when compared to gelatin-based packing for endoscopic myringoplasty. It should be considered as a competitive alternative given its other benefits.
明胶与壳聚糖在慢性化脓性中耳炎内窥镜鼓膜成形术中的应用
目的探讨各种中耳填塞材料对鼓膜成形术效果的影响,目前缺乏文献报道。可吸收的明胶海绵是常用的,尽管有报道它会引起中耳纤维化或粘连。壳聚糖基海绵具有止血、抗粘连和抗菌活性等有用的特性,可能使其在mymygoplasty中用于支持移植物。本研究比较了壳聚糖和明胶作为内窥镜鼓膜成形术的包装材料的移植成功率。方法对2021年6月至2024年3月在黄庭芳总医院耳鼻喉科行慢性化脓性中耳炎内窥镜鼓膜成形术的所有患者进行审计。术后随访至少3个月。移植成功的定义是在3个月结束时存在完整的移植物而没有穿孔。结果共分析91例患者。明胶和壳聚糖分别用于40例和51例患者。91例移植总成功率为79.1% (n = 72)。最常用的是正侧软骨膜(46.1%,n = 42/91),成功率为80.9% (n = 34/42)。不同移植类型和不同穿孔大小的移植成功率差异无统计学意义。壳聚糖组(80.4%,n = 41/51)与明胶组(77.5%,n = 31/40)的成功率无显著差异(p = 0.129, p = 0.399)。(p = 0.736)。结论壳聚糖填充物与明胶填充物在内窥镜鼓膜成形术中的成功率至少相当。鉴于其其他好处,它应被视为一种有竞争力的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信