Exploratory analysis of marine reserve site selection by Monte Carlo mixed integer programming

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Donna Ross Saycon , Shui-Kai Chang , Tung-Yung Fan , Chen-Lu Lee , Yang-Chi Chang , Pierre-Alexandre Château
{"title":"Exploratory analysis of marine reserve site selection by Monte Carlo mixed integer programming","authors":"Donna Ross Saycon ,&nbsp;Shui-Kai Chang ,&nbsp;Tung-Yung Fan ,&nbsp;Chen-Lu Lee ,&nbsp;Yang-Chi Chang ,&nbsp;Pierre-Alexandre Château","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marine reserve site selection is a complex process that requires balancing ecological conservation, socio-economic considerations, and management feasibility. Traditional multi-objective optimization methods often rely on the weighted sum approach, which introduces subjectivity and uncertainty in weight estimation. To enhance transparency and robustness, this study introduces an exploratory framework that integrates Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), Monte Carlo (MC) experiments, and Decision Tree (DT) analysis. Using Xiao Liuqiu Island in Taiwan as a case study, we ran an MIP site selection model 10,000 times to systematically explore different weighting scenarios for 21 ecological, socio-economic, and management features. The MC results revealed that 90 % of simulations consistently identified a single high-priority conservation zone, which exhibits high ecological, low socio-economic, and high management values. Two alternative zones emerged under specific weight conditions. The DT analysis pinpointed the threshold conditions that drive site selection shifts towards these zones, highlighting the most influential features shaping the decision-making process. By reducing reliance on predefined weights, this approach ensures globally optimal marine reserve configurations while providing decision-makers with clearer insights. The findings contribute to marine spatial planning, adaptive conservation strategies, and stakeholder-driven decision-making, fostering more effective and informed marine protection efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 107712"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine reserve site selection is a complex process that requires balancing ecological conservation, socio-economic considerations, and management feasibility. Traditional multi-objective optimization methods often rely on the weighted sum approach, which introduces subjectivity and uncertainty in weight estimation. To enhance transparency and robustness, this study introduces an exploratory framework that integrates Mixed Integer Programming (MIP), Monte Carlo (MC) experiments, and Decision Tree (DT) analysis. Using Xiao Liuqiu Island in Taiwan as a case study, we ran an MIP site selection model 10,000 times to systematically explore different weighting scenarios for 21 ecological, socio-economic, and management features. The MC results revealed that 90 % of simulations consistently identified a single high-priority conservation zone, which exhibits high ecological, low socio-economic, and high management values. Two alternative zones emerged under specific weight conditions. The DT analysis pinpointed the threshold conditions that drive site selection shifts towards these zones, highlighting the most influential features shaping the decision-making process. By reducing reliance on predefined weights, this approach ensures globally optimal marine reserve configurations while providing decision-makers with clearer insights. The findings contribute to marine spatial planning, adaptive conservation strategies, and stakeholder-driven decision-making, fostering more effective and informed marine protection efforts.
基于蒙特卡罗混合整数规划的海洋保护区选址探索性分析
海洋保护区选址是一个复杂的过程,需要平衡生态保护、社会经济考虑和管理可行性。传统的多目标优化方法往往依赖于加权和法,这给权重估计带来了主观性和不确定性。为了提高透明度和鲁棒性,本研究引入了一个探索性框架,该框架集成了混合整数规划(MIP)、蒙特卡罗(MC)实验和决策树(DT)分析。以台湾小六丘岛为例,通过1万次MIP选址模型,系统探索了21个生态、社会经济和管理特征的不同权重情景。MC结果表明,90%的模拟结果一致地确定了一个高优先保护区,该保护区具有高生态价值、低社会经济价值和高管理价值。在特定的重量条件下,出现了两个可供选择的区域。DT分析指出了促使选址向这些区域转移的阈值条件,突出了影响决策过程的最具影响力的特征。通过减少对预定义权重的依赖,这种方法确保了全球最佳的海洋保护区配置,同时为决策者提供了更清晰的见解。研究结果有助于海洋空间规划、适应性保护战略和利益相关者驱动的决策,促进更有效和更明智的海洋保护工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信