Alexander W. Marka , Felix Meurer , Vanessa Twardy , Markus Graf , Saba Ebrahimi Ardjomand , Kilian Weiss , Marcus R. Makowski , Alexandra S. Gersing , Dimitrios C. Karampinos , Jan Neumann , Klaus Woertler , Ingo J. Banke , Sarah C. Foreman
{"title":"Deep learning-based acceleration of high-resolution compressed sense MR imaging of the hip","authors":"Alexander W. Marka , Felix Meurer , Vanessa Twardy , Markus Graf , Saba Ebrahimi Ardjomand , Kilian Weiss , Marcus R. Makowski , Alexandra S. Gersing , Dimitrios C. Karampinos , Jan Neumann , Klaus Woertler , Ingo J. Banke , Sarah C. Foreman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate a Compressed Sense Artificial Intelligence framework (CSAI) incorporating parallel imaging, compressed sense (CS), and deep learning for high-resolution MRI of the hip, comparing it with standard-resolution CS imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-two patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome underwent 3 T MRI scans. Coronal and sagittal intermediate-weighted TSE sequences with fat saturation were acquired using CS (0.6 ×0.8 mm resolution) and CSAI (0.3 ×0.4 mm resolution) protocols in comparable acquisition times (7:49 vs. 8:07 minutes for both planes). Two readers systematically assessed the depiction of the acetabular and femoral cartilage (in five cartilage zones), labrum, ligamentum capitis femoris, and bone using a five-point Likert scale. Diagnostic confidence and abnormality detection were recorded and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CSAI significantly improved the cartilage depiction across most cartilage zones compared to CS. Overall Likert scores were 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.2 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 1 and 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.3 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 2 (p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased from 3.5 ± 0.7 and 3.9 ± 0.6 (CS) to 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 0.7 (CSAI) for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). More cartilage lesions were detected with CSAI, with significant improvements in diagnostic confidence in certain cartilage zones such as femoral zone C and D for both readers. Labrum and ligamentum capitis femoris depiction remained similar, while bone depiction was rated lower. No abnormalities detected in CS were missed in CSAI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CSAI provides high-resolution hip MR images with enhanced cartilage depiction without extending acquisition times, potentially enabling more precise hip cartilage assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate a Compressed Sense Artificial Intelligence framework (CSAI) incorporating parallel imaging, compressed sense (CS), and deep learning for high-resolution MRI of the hip, comparing it with standard-resolution CS imaging.
Methods
Thirty-two patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome underwent 3 T MRI scans. Coronal and sagittal intermediate-weighted TSE sequences with fat saturation were acquired using CS (0.6 ×0.8 mm resolution) and CSAI (0.3 ×0.4 mm resolution) protocols in comparable acquisition times (7:49 vs. 8:07 minutes for both planes). Two readers systematically assessed the depiction of the acetabular and femoral cartilage (in five cartilage zones), labrum, ligamentum capitis femoris, and bone using a five-point Likert scale. Diagnostic confidence and abnormality detection were recorded and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
CSAI significantly improved the cartilage depiction across most cartilage zones compared to CS. Overall Likert scores were 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.2 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 1 and 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.3 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 2 (p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased from 3.5 ± 0.7 and 3.9 ± 0.6 (CS) to 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 0.7 (CSAI) for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). More cartilage lesions were detected with CSAI, with significant improvements in diagnostic confidence in certain cartilage zones such as femoral zone C and D for both readers. Labrum and ligamentum capitis femoris depiction remained similar, while bone depiction was rated lower. No abnormalities detected in CS were missed in CSAI.
Conclusion
CSAI provides high-resolution hip MR images with enhanced cartilage depiction without extending acquisition times, potentially enabling more precise hip cartilage assessment.