Deep learning-based acceleration of high-resolution compressed sense MR imaging of the hip

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Alexander W. Marka , Felix Meurer , Vanessa Twardy , Markus Graf , Saba Ebrahimi Ardjomand , Kilian Weiss , Marcus R. Makowski , Alexandra S. Gersing , Dimitrios C. Karampinos , Jan Neumann , Klaus Woertler , Ingo J. Banke , Sarah C. Foreman
{"title":"Deep learning-based acceleration of high-resolution compressed sense MR imaging of the hip","authors":"Alexander W. Marka ,&nbsp;Felix Meurer ,&nbsp;Vanessa Twardy ,&nbsp;Markus Graf ,&nbsp;Saba Ebrahimi Ardjomand ,&nbsp;Kilian Weiss ,&nbsp;Marcus R. Makowski ,&nbsp;Alexandra S. Gersing ,&nbsp;Dimitrios C. Karampinos ,&nbsp;Jan Neumann ,&nbsp;Klaus Woertler ,&nbsp;Ingo J. Banke ,&nbsp;Sarah C. Foreman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate a Compressed Sense Artificial Intelligence framework (CSAI) incorporating parallel imaging, compressed sense (CS), and deep learning for high-resolution MRI of the hip, comparing it with standard-resolution CS imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-two patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome underwent 3 T MRI scans. Coronal and sagittal intermediate-weighted TSE sequences with fat saturation were acquired using CS (0.6 ×0.8 mm resolution) and CSAI (0.3 ×0.4 mm resolution) protocols in comparable acquisition times (7:49 vs. 8:07 minutes for both planes). Two readers systematically assessed the depiction of the acetabular and femoral cartilage (in five cartilage zones), labrum, ligamentum capitis femoris, and bone using a five-point Likert scale. Diagnostic confidence and abnormality detection were recorded and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CSAI significantly improved the cartilage depiction across most cartilage zones compared to CS. Overall Likert scores were 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.2 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 1 and 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.3 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 2 (p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased from 3.5 ± 0.7 and 3.9 ± 0.6 (CS) to 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 0.7 (CSAI) for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). More cartilage lesions were detected with CSAI, with significant improvements in diagnostic confidence in certain cartilage zones such as femoral zone C and D for both readers. Labrum and ligamentum capitis femoris depiction remained similar, while bone depiction was rated lower. No abnormalities detected in CS were missed in CSAI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CSAI provides high-resolution hip MR images with enhanced cartilage depiction without extending acquisition times, potentially enabling more precise hip cartilage assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100656"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a Compressed Sense Artificial Intelligence framework (CSAI) incorporating parallel imaging, compressed sense (CS), and deep learning for high-resolution MRI of the hip, comparing it with standard-resolution CS imaging.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome underwent 3 T MRI scans. Coronal and sagittal intermediate-weighted TSE sequences with fat saturation were acquired using CS (0.6 ×0.8 mm resolution) and CSAI (0.3 ×0.4 mm resolution) protocols in comparable acquisition times (7:49 vs. 8:07 minutes for both planes). Two readers systematically assessed the depiction of the acetabular and femoral cartilage (in five cartilage zones), labrum, ligamentum capitis femoris, and bone using a five-point Likert scale. Diagnostic confidence and abnormality detection were recorded and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

CSAI significantly improved the cartilage depiction across most cartilage zones compared to CS. Overall Likert scores were 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.2 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 1 and 4.0 ± 0.2 (CS) vs 4.3 ± 0.6 (CSAI) for reader 2 (p ≤ 0.001). Diagnostic confidence increased from 3.5 ± 0.7 and 3.9 ± 0.6 (CS) to 4.0 ± 0.6 and 4.1 ± 0.7 (CSAI) for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). More cartilage lesions were detected with CSAI, with significant improvements in diagnostic confidence in certain cartilage zones such as femoral zone C and D for both readers. Labrum and ligamentum capitis femoris depiction remained similar, while bone depiction was rated lower. No abnormalities detected in CS were missed in CSAI.

Conclusion

CSAI provides high-resolution hip MR images with enhanced cartilage depiction without extending acquisition times, potentially enabling more precise hip cartilage assessment.
基于深度学习的髋关节高分辨率压缩感MR成像加速
目的评估一种结合并行成像、压缩感(CS)和深度学习的压缩感人工智能框架(CSAI),用于高分辨率髋关节MRI,并将其与标准分辨率CS成像进行比较。方法对32例股髋臼撞击综合征患者行3次 T MRI扫描。采用CS(0.6 ×0.8 mm分辨率)和CSAI(0.3 ×0.4 mm分辨率)方案获得脂肪饱和的冠状面和矢状面中权重TSE序列,获取时间相当(两个平面分别为7:49和8:07 分钟)。两位读者系统地评估了髋臼和股骨软骨的描述(在五个软骨区),唇,股头韧带和骨骼使用五点李克特量表。诊断置信度和异常检测记录并使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行分析。结果与CS相比,scsai显著改善了大部分软骨区的软骨描绘。整体李克特 分数4.0±0.2 (CS)和4.2 ± 0.6 (CSAI)为读者1和4.0 ± 0.2 (CS)和4.3 ± 0.6 (CSAI)读者2 (p ≤ 0.001)。诊断信心增加从3.5 ±  0.7和3.9±0.6 (CS) 4.0 ±  0.6和4.1±0.7 (CSAI)读者1和2,分别(p ≤ 0.001)。CSAI检测到更多的软骨病变,在某些软骨区,如股骨C区和D区,两位读者的诊断信心都有显著提高。肱骨唇和股头韧带的描述保持相似,而骨描述的评分较低。在CSAI中未发现CS异常。结论csai提供了高分辨率的髋关节MR图像,增强了软骨的描绘,而不延长采集时间,有可能实现更精确的髋关节软骨评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信