{"title":"Efficacy of electrical stimulation for antimicrobial capacity of titanium materials implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Simone Kreve, Andréa C. dos Reis","doi":"10.1016/j.job.2025.100669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antimicrobial resistance undermines the effectiveness of drugs for treating implant-associated infections. Consequently, there is growing interest in identifying alternative methods to prevent and eliminate infections. The aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether the electrical stimulation of titanium implants or titanium-based implant materials has antimicrobial properties against bacterial biofilms. The search was conducted in various databases, including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, in February 2024. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was conducted. The eligibility criteria included in vivo and in vitro studies evaluating the effects of electrical stimulation on titanium implants or titanium-based implant materials in reducing biofilm formation or adhesion as well as eradicating or reducing the viability of bacterial biofilms. The variability between studies was determined using the inverse variance method with random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and prediction interval statistics. Publication bias was qualitatively evaluated using funnel plots.</div></div><div><h3>Highlights</h3><div>Different electrical stimulation (ES) parameters (current and voltage) exhibited antibacterial activity, resulting in either bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ES in titanium or titanium-based implant materials confers antimicrobial capacity against bacterial biofilms, and its effectiveness depends on the applied tension. The association between ES and antimicrobials was more robust than with ES administered individually.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Biosciences","volume":"67 2","pages":"Article 100669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1349007925000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Antimicrobial resistance undermines the effectiveness of drugs for treating implant-associated infections. Consequently, there is growing interest in identifying alternative methods to prevent and eliminate infections. The aim of this systematic review was to ascertain whether the electrical stimulation of titanium implants or titanium-based implant materials has antimicrobial properties against bacterial biofilms. The search was conducted in various databases, including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar, in February 2024. In addition, a manual search of the reference lists of the included articles was conducted. The eligibility criteria included in vivo and in vitro studies evaluating the effects of electrical stimulation on titanium implants or titanium-based implant materials in reducing biofilm formation or adhesion as well as eradicating or reducing the viability of bacterial biofilms. The variability between studies was determined using the inverse variance method with random- and fixed-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and prediction interval statistics. Publication bias was qualitatively evaluated using funnel plots.
Highlights
Different electrical stimulation (ES) parameters (current and voltage) exhibited antibacterial activity, resulting in either bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects.
Conclusions
ES in titanium or titanium-based implant materials confers antimicrobial capacity against bacterial biofilms, and its effectiveness depends on the applied tension. The association between ES and antimicrobials was more robust than with ES administered individually.
抗生素耐药性破坏了治疗种植体相关感染药物的有效性。因此,人们对确定预防和消除感染的替代方法越来越感兴趣。本系统综述的目的是确定钛植入物或钛基植入物材料的电刺激是否对细菌生物膜具有抗菌性能。检索于2024年2月在PubMed/Medline、Web of Science、EMBASE、SCOPUS和谷歌Scholar等多个数据库中进行。此外,还进行了人工检索纳入文章的参考文献列表。资格标准包括体内和体外研究,评估电刺激对钛植入物或钛基植入材料在减少生物膜形成或粘附以及根除或降低细菌生物膜活力方面的影响。研究之间的可变性是用随机效应和固定效应模型的反方差法确定的。异质性评估采用I2和预测区间统计。发表偏倚采用漏斗图进行定性评价。不同的电刺激(ES)参数(电流和电压)表现出抗菌活性,导致抑菌或杀菌效果。结论钛或钛基种植材料中的硒具有抗细菌生物膜的能力,其效果取决于施加的张力。ES和抗菌剂之间的相关性比单独使用ES更强。