Exploring environmental and cardiometabolic impacts associated with adherence to the sustainable EAT-Lancet reference diet: findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey.
Man Wu,Yiqian Lv,Wenjing Liu,Ke Liu,Yin Wang,Zhixin Cui,Huicui Meng
{"title":"Exploring environmental and cardiometabolic impacts associated with adherence to the sustainable EAT-Lancet reference diet: findings from the China Health and Nutrition Survey.","authors":"Man Wu,Yiqian Lv,Wenjing Liu,Ke Liu,Yin Wang,Zhixin Cui,Huicui Meng","doi":"10.1289/ehp15006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nTo contribute to the growing evidence on the potential co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet reference diet for cardiometabolic health and sustainability, we investigated this topic in a nation-wide prospective cohort of Chinese adults. Adherence to this diet has been measured using several indices, including World Index for Sustainability and Health (WISH) and Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI).\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nWe aimed to investigate the associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet, as evaluated by WISH and PHDI, with risk of new-onset cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs), risk of all-cause mortality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included adults (N=14,652 for CMDs and 15,318 for all-cause mortality) from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997-2015) in the analysis. Dietary intake data were collected and WISH and PHDI scores were computed with established methods. CMDs included myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and stroke. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models, to analyze data with a mean of 10-years of follow-up from the date of baseline to the end of study or until the occurrence of the event of interest whichever came first. We adjusted for sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle and dietary characteristics of participants as confounders.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nGreater adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet, as reflected by higher WISH or PHDI scores, were inversely associated with risk of MI (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.96) for WISH and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07-0.29) for PHDI), T2DM (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.81 (95% CI: 0.67-0.96) for WISH and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82) for PHDI), all-cause mortality (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.95) for WISH and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46-0.80) for PHDI) in fully adjusted models (all P-trend <0.05). Both WISH and PHDI were inversely associated with GHG emissions in fully adjusted models (all P-trend <0.05). WISH and PHDI were not significantly associated with risk of stroke.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur findings supported the co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet reference diet for both cardiometabolic health and environmental sustainability. Long-term adherence to this reference diet as effectively indicated by either higher WISH or PHDI scores may reduce the risk and burden of CMDs and all-cause mortality in Chinese adults. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15006.","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp15006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
To contribute to the growing evidence on the potential co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet reference diet for cardiometabolic health and sustainability, we investigated this topic in a nation-wide prospective cohort of Chinese adults. Adherence to this diet has been measured using several indices, including World Index for Sustainability and Health (WISH) and Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI).
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to investigate the associations between adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet, as evaluated by WISH and PHDI, with risk of new-onset cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs), risk of all-cause mortality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
METHODS
We included adults (N=14,652 for CMDs and 15,318 for all-cause mortality) from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1997-2015) in the analysis. Dietary intake data were collected and WISH and PHDI scores were computed with established methods. CMDs included myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and stroke. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models, to analyze data with a mean of 10-years of follow-up from the date of baseline to the end of study or until the occurrence of the event of interest whichever came first. We adjusted for sociodemographic, anthropometric, lifestyle and dietary characteristics of participants as confounders.
RESULTS
Greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet, as reflected by higher WISH or PHDI scores, were inversely associated with risk of MI (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.96) for WISH and 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07-0.29) for PHDI), T2DM (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.81 (95% CI: 0.67-0.96) for WISH and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82) for PHDI), all-cause mortality (Q4 vs Q1:HR=0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.95) for WISH and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46-0.80) for PHDI) in fully adjusted models (all P-trend <0.05). Both WISH and PHDI were inversely associated with GHG emissions in fully adjusted models (all P-trend <0.05). WISH and PHDI were not significantly associated with risk of stroke.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings supported the co-benefits of the EAT-Lancet reference diet for both cardiometabolic health and environmental sustainability. Long-term adherence to this reference diet as effectively indicated by either higher WISH or PHDI scores may reduce the risk and burden of CMDs and all-cause mortality in Chinese adults. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15006.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.