Self-compassion in the moment: Dynamic changes of compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding in daily life.

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Nan Zhao,David L Vogel,Thomas Kubiak,Lara Kristin Mey,Karolina Morello,Oliver Tüscher
{"title":"Self-compassion in the moment: Dynamic changes of compassionate and uncompassionate self-responding in daily life.","authors":"Nan Zhao,David L Vogel,Thomas Kubiak,Lara Kristin Mey,Karolina Morello,Oliver Tüscher","doi":"10.1037/cou0000798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One important debate about self-compassion is whether it should be conceptualized as one general construct or two separate constructs: compassionate self-responding (CS) and uncompassionate self-responding (UCS). However, our understanding of self-compassion has been restricted to examining it as a trait-like construct assessed at a single time point, thus limiting our understanding of potentially important fluctuations in compassion within-person and over time. Therefore, to move forward the debate, the present study used a novel method, Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling, to examine the within-person temporal dynamics between CS and UCS. Participants were 114 German adults who reported their momentary state of CS and UCS six times a day for 7 days using a smartphone. Both autoregressive effects (i.e., CS at previous moment predicts subsequent CS) and cross-lagged effects (i.e., CS at previous moment predicts subsequent UCS) were modeled. We found evidence for positive autoregressive effects of both constructs while no evidence for cross-lagged effects. We further found that these effects are not constant across individuals, as indicated by the significant random effects. Our results highlight the utility of separating self-compassion into CS and UCS at the within-person level in order to better inform the development of tailored interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One important debate about self-compassion is whether it should be conceptualized as one general construct or two separate constructs: compassionate self-responding (CS) and uncompassionate self-responding (UCS). However, our understanding of self-compassion has been restricted to examining it as a trait-like construct assessed at a single time point, thus limiting our understanding of potentially important fluctuations in compassion within-person and over time. Therefore, to move forward the debate, the present study used a novel method, Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling, to examine the within-person temporal dynamics between CS and UCS. Participants were 114 German adults who reported their momentary state of CS and UCS six times a day for 7 days using a smartphone. Both autoregressive effects (i.e., CS at previous moment predicts subsequent CS) and cross-lagged effects (i.e., CS at previous moment predicts subsequent UCS) were modeled. We found evidence for positive autoregressive effects of both constructs while no evidence for cross-lagged effects. We further found that these effects are not constant across individuals, as indicated by the significant random effects. Our results highlight the utility of separating self-compassion into CS and UCS at the within-person level in order to better inform the development of tailored interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
当下的自我同情:在日常生活中富有同情心和不富有同情心的自我反应的动态变化。
关于自我同情的一个重要争论是它是否应该被概念化为一个总体结构还是两个独立的结构:富有同情心的自我反应(CS)和无同情心的自我反应(UCS)。然而,我们对自我同情的理解一直局限于将其作为一个单一时间点评估的类似特质的结构来研究,从而限制了我们对个人和时间内在同情的潜在重要波动的理解。因此,为了推进这一争论,本研究使用了一种新的方法,即动态结构方程模型,来研究CS和UCS之间的人内时间动态。参与者是114名德国成年人,他们使用智能手机每天报告6次他们的瞬时CS和UCS状态,持续7天。自回归效应(即前一刻的CS预测随后的CS)和交叉滞后效应(即前一刻的CS预测随后的UCS)都被建模。我们发现了这两种构念的积极自回归效应的证据,而没有证据表明存在交叉滞后效应。我们进一步发现,这些影响在个体之间不是恒定的,正如显著的随机效应所表明的那样。我们的研究结果强调了在个人层面将自我同情分为CS和UCS的效用,以便更好地为量身定制的干预措施的开发提供信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信