Stress associated with antiracism advocacy among racially/ethnically minoritized individuals: The role of racial-ethnic socialization.

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Brian TaeHyuk Keum,Cathy Zhu,Mahnoor Kazmi,Alex Pieterse
{"title":"Stress associated with antiracism advocacy among racially/ethnically minoritized individuals: The role of racial-ethnic socialization.","authors":"Brian TaeHyuk Keum,Cathy Zhu,Mahnoor Kazmi,Alex Pieterse","doi":"10.1037/cou0000797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antiracism advocacy has been identified as a culturally relevant form of self- and community care that allows racially/ethnically minoritized individuals to persist, heal, and resist systems of oppression in the United States. Despite the benefits, recent research has found that engaging in antiracism advocacy may be emotionally draining and exhausting. It is important to examine factors that can contextualize, explain, and address the stress of engaging in antiracism advocacy. Thus, we examined whether types of racial-ethnic socialization (cultural socialization, promotion of mistrust, preparation for bias, and silence about race) from parents about racism and race-related issues would moderate the relationship between antiracism advocacy and stress. We conducted latent moderated structural equation modeling to analyze online convenience data from 407 racially minoritized adults (Mage = 34.12; 40% Black, 23% Asian, 20% Latine, 9% multiracial, and 8% other). Engaging in institutional (but not individual) antiracism advocacy was significantly associated with psychological distress, and this association was exacerbated among those who received average to high levels of messages, reflecting promotion of mistrust, preparation for bias, and silence about race from their parents. Conversely, stress was not significant for those who received low levels of these three messages. Cultural socialization was not found to be a significant moderator. Implications include translating these findings into a more nuanced support system and care for those engaging in antiracism advocacy and incorporating the context of racial-ethnic socialization in understanding the nature of the associated stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000797","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antiracism advocacy has been identified as a culturally relevant form of self- and community care that allows racially/ethnically minoritized individuals to persist, heal, and resist systems of oppression in the United States. Despite the benefits, recent research has found that engaging in antiracism advocacy may be emotionally draining and exhausting. It is important to examine factors that can contextualize, explain, and address the stress of engaging in antiracism advocacy. Thus, we examined whether types of racial-ethnic socialization (cultural socialization, promotion of mistrust, preparation for bias, and silence about race) from parents about racism and race-related issues would moderate the relationship between antiracism advocacy and stress. We conducted latent moderated structural equation modeling to analyze online convenience data from 407 racially minoritized adults (Mage = 34.12; 40% Black, 23% Asian, 20% Latine, 9% multiracial, and 8% other). Engaging in institutional (but not individual) antiracism advocacy was significantly associated with psychological distress, and this association was exacerbated among those who received average to high levels of messages, reflecting promotion of mistrust, preparation for bias, and silence about race from their parents. Conversely, stress was not significant for those who received low levels of these three messages. Cultural socialization was not found to be a significant moderator. Implications include translating these findings into a more nuanced support system and care for those engaging in antiracism advocacy and incorporating the context of racial-ethnic socialization in understanding the nature of the associated stress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在种族/民族少数群体中与反种族主义宣传相关的压力:种族-民族社会化的作用。
反种族主义倡导被认为是一种与文化相关的自我和社区关怀形式,它允许种族/民族少数群体的个人坚持、治愈和抵制美国的压迫制度。尽管有这些好处,但最近的研究发现,参与反种族主义宣传可能会让人精疲力竭。重要的是要检查能够将反种族主义宣传的压力置于背景下,解释和解决这些压力的因素。因此,我们研究了父母关于种族主义和种族相关问题的种族-民族社会化类型(文化社会化、促进不信任、准备偏见和对种族沉默)是否会调节反种族主义倡导与压力之间的关系。我们使用潜在调节结构方程模型分析了407名少数民族成年人的在线便利数据(Mage = 34.12;40%黑人,23%亚洲人,20%拉丁人,9%多种族,8%其他)。参与机构(而非个人)的反种族主义宣传与心理困扰显著相关,而这种关联在那些收到平均到高水平信息的人身上得到了加剧,这反映了父母对种族的不信任、偏见和沉默的促进。相反,对于那些接收到低水平这三种信息的人来说,压力并不显著。文化社会化并不是一个重要的调节因素。影响包括将这些发现转化为更细致的支持系统和对那些从事反种族主义宣传的人的照顾,并将种族-民族社会化的背景纳入理解相关压力的本质。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信