Analyzing 3D Steady Variable Coefficients Convection–Diffusion-Reaction Equations via a Hybrid Element-Free Galerkin Method

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jiao Zhang, Yi-Chen Yang, Feng-Bin Liu, Heng Cheng
{"title":"Analyzing 3D Steady Variable Coefficients Convection–Diffusion-Reaction Equations via a Hybrid Element-Free Galerkin Method","authors":"Jiao Zhang,&nbsp;Yi-Chen Yang,&nbsp;Feng-Bin Liu,&nbsp;Heng Cheng","doi":"10.1002/fld.5386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study introduces a hybrid element-free Galerkin (HEFG) method to analyze the 3D steady convection–diffusion-reaction equation. By introducing the dimension-splitting method, the governing equation can be split into 2D form in each layer. The 2D form can be solved using the improved element-free Galerkin (IEFG) method with improved moving least-squares (IMLS) approximation as shape function, and discretized equations of 2D form are derived. The finite difference method (FDM) is selected to handle first- and second-order derivatives in the splitting direction. Thus, new 2D discretized equations in each plane are derived, and the final solved equation of the original 3D problem is obtained by coupling these 2D discretized equations. In numerical examples, we study the astringency of the HEFG method by examining the impact of layer and node on relative errors, and the computing time and accuracy of numerical solutions are compared with the dimension-coupling method (DCM), IEFG method, and exact one. The HEFG method can significantly reduce the calculation times of the IEFG method. Compared with the DCM, the advantage of the proposed method is its shorter computing time when dealing with essential boundaries in a splitting direction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 6","pages":"996-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study introduces a hybrid element-free Galerkin (HEFG) method to analyze the 3D steady convection–diffusion-reaction equation. By introducing the dimension-splitting method, the governing equation can be split into 2D form in each layer. The 2D form can be solved using the improved element-free Galerkin (IEFG) method with improved moving least-squares (IMLS) approximation as shape function, and discretized equations of 2D form are derived. The finite difference method (FDM) is selected to handle first- and second-order derivatives in the splitting direction. Thus, new 2D discretized equations in each plane are derived, and the final solved equation of the original 3D problem is obtained by coupling these 2D discretized equations. In numerical examples, we study the astringency of the HEFG method by examining the impact of layer and node on relative errors, and the computing time and accuracy of numerical solutions are compared with the dimension-coupling method (DCM), IEFG method, and exact one. The HEFG method can significantly reduce the calculation times of the IEFG method. Compared with the DCM, the advantage of the proposed method is its shorter computing time when dealing with essential boundaries in a splitting direction.

Abstract Image

用混合无单元伽辽金法分析三维定常变系数对流-扩散-反应方程
本文引入一种混合无单元伽辽金(HEFG)方法来分析三维定常对流-扩散-反应方程。通过引入分维方法,可以将控制方程在每一层分解成二维形式。采用改进的无单元伽辽金(IEFG)方法,以改进的移动最小二乘(IMLS)近似作为形状函数,对其二维形式进行求解,并导出二维形式的离散化方程。选择有限差分法(FDM)来处理分裂方向上的一阶和二阶导数。从而在每个平面上导出新的二维离散方程,并将这些二维离散方程耦合得到原三维问题的最终解方程。在数值算例中,通过考察层和节点对相对误差的影响,研究了HEFG方法的收敛性,并将数值解的计算时间和精度与尺寸耦合法(DCM)、IEFG方法和精确方法进行了比较。HEFG方法可以显著减少IEFG方法的计算次数。与DCM方法相比,该方法在分割方向上处理本质边界时的计算时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信