Courtney M. Moeller, Joseph W. Bartges, Kelsey D. Brust, Philip H. Kass, Rebecca F. Kelly, Erin W. Lashnits, Chai-Fei Li, Lindsay K. Merkel, Jessica C. Pritchard, Jane E. Sykes
{"title":"Clinical Features That Increase Suspicion of Brucella canis Infection in Dogs With Discospondylitis: A Multicenter Case–Control Study","authors":"Courtney M. Moeller, Joseph W. Bartges, Kelsey D. Brust, Philip H. Kass, Rebecca F. Kelly, Erin W. Lashnits, Chai-Fei Li, Lindsay K. Merkel, Jessica C. Pritchard, Jane E. Sykes","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p><i>Brucella canis</i> is an important cause of discospondylitis in dogs, and brucellosis can be challenging to diagnose. Early recognition could aid in early implementation of precautions to limit zoonotic transmission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Hypothesis/Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether specific clinical features exist that differentiate <i>Brucella canis</i> infection from other causes of discospondylitis in dogs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen dogs with <i>Brucella canis</i> discospondylitis (cases) and 25 dogs with non<i>-Brucella</i> discospondylitis (controls) evaluated between 2010 and 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multi-institutional retrospective case–control study. Clinical features in cases were compared to those in temporally matched controls using conditional logistic regression analysis. Neurologic examination findings and radiographic findings were documented by a board-certified neurologist and radiologist who were masked to group identity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No case had a history of being bred or kennel housing. Cases were younger (median, 2.6 years) than controls (median, 5.7 years) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.00). There were no differences in sex or breed. Compared to controls, cases had a lower odds of neurologic deficits (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03; 95% CI 0.00–0.85), higher odds of C2-C5 involvement (OR = 13.0; 95% CI 1.6–106.7), and higher odds of multiple disc site involvement (OR = 12.0, 95% CI 1.5–95.8). They had a lower odds of neutrophilia (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.92), a higher median hematocrit (50.6% versus 43.7%; OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.03), and a higher median lymphocyte count (1.8 × 1000/μL vs. 1.1 × 1000/μL; OR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.05–5.45). There was no difference in the radiographic appearance of lesions between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p><i>Brucella canis</i> infection should still be considered in cases of discospondylitis regardless of neuter status, sex, and breeding history. Clinical features exist that should increase suspicion for brucellosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Brucella canis is an important cause of discospondylitis in dogs, and brucellosis can be challenging to diagnose. Early recognition could aid in early implementation of precautions to limit zoonotic transmission.
Hypothesis/Objectives
To determine whether specific clinical features exist that differentiate Brucella canis infection from other causes of discospondylitis in dogs.
Animals
Fifteen dogs with Brucella canis discospondylitis (cases) and 25 dogs with non-Brucella discospondylitis (controls) evaluated between 2010 and 2021.
Methods
Multi-institutional retrospective case–control study. Clinical features in cases were compared to those in temporally matched controls using conditional logistic regression analysis. Neurologic examination findings and radiographic findings were documented by a board-certified neurologist and radiologist who were masked to group identity.
Results
No case had a history of being bred or kennel housing. Cases were younger (median, 2.6 years) than controls (median, 5.7 years) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–1.00). There were no differences in sex or breed. Compared to controls, cases had a lower odds of neurologic deficits (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03; 95% CI 0.00–0.85), higher odds of C2-C5 involvement (OR = 13.0; 95% CI 1.6–106.7), and higher odds of multiple disc site involvement (OR = 12.0, 95% CI 1.5–95.8). They had a lower odds of neutrophilia (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.92), a higher median hematocrit (50.6% versus 43.7%; OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.09–2.03), and a higher median lymphocyte count (1.8 × 1000/μL vs. 1.1 × 1000/μL; OR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.05–5.45). There was no difference in the radiographic appearance of lesions between groups.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Brucella canis infection should still be considered in cases of discospondylitis regardless of neuter status, sex, and breeding history. Clinical features exist that should increase suspicion for brucellosis.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.