Differential impacts of invasion on plant communities of two types of savannas in India

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Megha Ojha, Bhushan K. Shigwan, Ashish N. Nerlekar, Mandar N. Datar, Bhanudas P. Chavan, Deepak Barua
{"title":"Differential impacts of invasion on plant communities of two types of savannas in India","authors":"Megha Ojha,&nbsp;Bhushan K. Shigwan,&nbsp;Ashish N. Nerlekar,&nbsp;Mandar N. Datar,&nbsp;Bhanudas P. Chavan,&nbsp;Deepak Barua","doi":"10.1002/eap.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological invasions pose a threat to biodiversity in tropical savannas. Invasive plants can alter savanna communities in complex ways, where impacts can vary with the intensity of invasion, the spatial scales examined, and by climate. However, our understanding of such impacts on Asian tropical savannas is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we examined how plant invasion impacted plant communities across increasing levels of invasion, at different spatial scales, in two climatically determined savannas in tropical India. We sampled vegetation at three sites each in drier fine-leaf savannas (FLS) and wetter broadleaf savannas (BLS). At each site, we sampled replicate locations with plots assigned to uninvaded savannas, invaded savannas at three invasion levels, and old-growth savannas that served as a benchmark for comparison. We quantified alpha and beta plant diversity, and differences in community composition that were partitioned into components representative of species loss and replacement. We found that while richness and diversity decreased linearly, evenness increased linearly with invasion. The loss of species was much greater in BLS (60%) than in FLS (30%). Differences in composition with invasion were more pronounced in BLS and driven by species turnover in both savannas. We did not find evidence for homogenization at larger spatial scales, with no differences in beta diversity in FLS and an increase in BLS with invasion. These results highlight the utility of examining multiple measures of diversity, as they provide insights into how relationships between richness and evenness can translate into diversity. The linear nature of responses of the community to increasing invasion suggests that management efforts may be equally effective at different stages of invasion in these savannas. Further, the observed increase in beta diversity in invaded BLS communities adds to the growing reports of spatial scale-dependent effects and reinforces the need to examine invasion at multiple spatial scales. Overall, the greater loss of species and pronounced community changes in BLS, which is the dominant savanna type in the Indian subcontinent and home to many endemic species, suggest that it should be prioritized for conservation, management, and future restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological invasions pose a threat to biodiversity in tropical savannas. Invasive plants can alter savanna communities in complex ways, where impacts can vary with the intensity of invasion, the spatial scales examined, and by climate. However, our understanding of such impacts on Asian tropical savannas is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we examined how plant invasion impacted plant communities across increasing levels of invasion, at different spatial scales, in two climatically determined savannas in tropical India. We sampled vegetation at three sites each in drier fine-leaf savannas (FLS) and wetter broadleaf savannas (BLS). At each site, we sampled replicate locations with plots assigned to uninvaded savannas, invaded savannas at three invasion levels, and old-growth savannas that served as a benchmark for comparison. We quantified alpha and beta plant diversity, and differences in community composition that were partitioned into components representative of species loss and replacement. We found that while richness and diversity decreased linearly, evenness increased linearly with invasion. The loss of species was much greater in BLS (60%) than in FLS (30%). Differences in composition with invasion were more pronounced in BLS and driven by species turnover in both savannas. We did not find evidence for homogenization at larger spatial scales, with no differences in beta diversity in FLS and an increase in BLS with invasion. These results highlight the utility of examining multiple measures of diversity, as they provide insights into how relationships between richness and evenness can translate into diversity. The linear nature of responses of the community to increasing invasion suggests that management efforts may be equally effective at different stages of invasion in these savannas. Further, the observed increase in beta diversity in invaded BLS communities adds to the growing reports of spatial scale-dependent effects and reinforces the need to examine invasion at multiple spatial scales. Overall, the greater loss of species and pronounced community changes in BLS, which is the dominant savanna type in the Indian subcontinent and home to many endemic species, suggest that it should be prioritized for conservation, management, and future restoration.

入侵对印度两种稀树草原植物群落的差异影响
生物入侵对热带稀树草原的生物多样性构成威胁。入侵植物可以以复杂的方式改变稀树草原群落,其影响可能因入侵强度、所检查的空间尺度和气候而异。然而,我们对这种影响对亚洲热带稀树草原的理解是有限的。为了解决这一知识缺口,我们研究了在不同的空间尺度上,在印度热带两个气候决定的稀树草原上,随着入侵水平的提高,植物入侵如何影响植物群落。我们在干燥的细叶热带稀树草原(FLS)和湿润的阔叶热带稀树草原(BLS)的三个地点进行了植被采样。在每个地点,我们复制了未被入侵的稀树草原、被入侵的稀树草原和作为比较基准的原始稀树草原。我们量化了α和β植物多样性,并将群落组成差异划分为代表物种损失和替代的组分。丰富度和多样性随入侵呈线性下降,均匀度随入侵呈线性增加。生物多样性的损失(60%)明显大于生物多样性的损失(30%)。两种热带稀树草原的物种更替驱动了物种组成与入侵之间的差异。我们没有发现在更大的空间尺度上均质化的证据,FLS的β多样性没有差异,而BLS随着入侵而增加。这些结果强调了研究多样性的多种措施的效用,因为它们为丰富度和均匀度之间的关系如何转化为多样性提供了见解。群落对日益增加的入侵的线性反应表明,在这些稀树草原的入侵的不同阶段,管理努力可能同样有效。此外,在入侵的BLS群落中观察到的β多样性的增加增加了越来越多的空间尺度依赖效应的报告,并加强了在多个空间尺度上研究入侵的必要性。总体而言,作为印度次大陆的主要稀树草原类型和许多特有物种的家园,BLS的物种损失更大,群落变化明显,这表明它应该被优先考虑保护、管理和未来的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信