Asymmetric Modulation of Brain Connectivity by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals: A Single-Blind, Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tiffany Carther-Krone, Zachary A. McAllister, Eun Hyung Choi, Lawrence Ryner, Ji Hyun Ko
{"title":"Asymmetric Modulation of Brain Connectivity by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals: A Single-Blind, Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial","authors":"Tiffany Carther-Krone,&nbsp;Zachary A. McAllister,&nbsp;Eun Hyung Choi,&nbsp;Lawrence Ryner,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Ko","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown asymmetric behavioral effects, though the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. In this preliminary study with 34 healthy individuals, tDCS was applied to either the left or right DLPFC or a sham group. Behavioral and neurophysiological changes were examined by the Stroop test and resting-state fMRI, respectively, which were measured before and after a 15-min tDCS session. Seed-to-voxel connectivity analysis with seeds placed under the tDCS target regions (F3 and F4) showed no significant changes, but voxel-to-voxel whole-brain intrinsic connectivity (IC) analysis revealed significant 3 × 2 interaction effects (stimulation site × time) in the right DLPFC (18 mm off from the F4). Post hoc analysis showed that only the right DLPFC stimulation led to an increase in IC from pre- to post-stimulation. Consistent with this finding, right DLPFC stimulation improved Stroop task performance measured by increased interference score, which represents better inhibition of irrelevant information. These findings provide further insights into the hemispheric difference of tDCS effects and its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results and necessitates further research with a larger cohort for confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70218","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown asymmetric behavioral effects, though the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. In this preliminary study with 34 healthy individuals, tDCS was applied to either the left or right DLPFC or a sham group. Behavioral and neurophysiological changes were examined by the Stroop test and resting-state fMRI, respectively, which were measured before and after a 15-min tDCS session. Seed-to-voxel connectivity analysis with seeds placed under the tDCS target regions (F3 and F4) showed no significant changes, but voxel-to-voxel whole-brain intrinsic connectivity (IC) analysis revealed significant 3 × 2 interaction effects (stimulation site × time) in the right DLPFC (18 mm off from the F4). Post hoc analysis showed that only the right DLPFC stimulation led to an increase in IC from pre- to post-stimulation. Consistent with this finding, right DLPFC stimulation improved Stroop task performance measured by increased interference score, which represents better inhibition of irrelevant information. These findings provide further insights into the hemispheric difference of tDCS effects and its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results and necessitates further research with a larger cohort for confirmation.

Abstract Image

健康个体通过阳极经颅直流电刺激对大脑连通性的不对称调节:一项单盲、随机假对照试验
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)应用于背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)显示出不对称的行为效应,尽管潜在的神经生理机制尚不清楚。在这项对34名健康个体的初步研究中,tDCS应用于左、右DLPFC或假手术组。行为和神经生理变化分别通过Stroop测试和静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)检测,分别在15分钟tDCS之前和之后测量。将种子放置在tDCS靶区(F3和F4)下的种子-体素连通性分析显示无显著变化,但体素-体素全脑内在连通性(IC)分析显示,右侧DLPFC(距F4 18 mm)存在显著的3 × 2相互作用效应(刺激部位×时间)。事后分析表明,只有正确的DLPFC刺激导致IC从刺激前到刺激后增加。与这一发现一致的是,右侧DLPFC刺激提高了Stroop任务的表现,通过增加干扰得分来衡量,这表明对无关信息的抑制更好。这些发现为tDCS效应的半球差异及其潜在的神经生理机制提供了进一步的见解。然而,小样本量限制了结果的普遍性,需要进一步研究更大的队列来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信