Asymmetric Modulation of Brain Connectivity by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals: A Single-Blind, Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
Tiffany Carther-Krone, Zachary A. McAllister, Eun Hyung Choi, Lawrence Ryner, Ji Hyun Ko
{"title":"Asymmetric Modulation of Brain Connectivity by Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals: A Single-Blind, Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial","authors":"Tiffany Carther-Krone, Zachary A. McAllister, Eun Hyung Choi, Lawrence Ryner, Ji Hyun Ko","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown asymmetric behavioral effects, though the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. In this preliminary study with 34 healthy individuals, tDCS was applied to either the left or right DLPFC or a sham group. Behavioral and neurophysiological changes were examined by the Stroop test and resting-state fMRI, respectively, which were measured before and after a 15-min tDCS session. Seed-to-voxel connectivity analysis with seeds placed under the tDCS target regions (F3 and F4) showed no significant changes, but voxel-to-voxel whole-brain intrinsic connectivity (IC) analysis revealed significant 3 × 2 interaction effects (stimulation site × time) in the right DLPFC (18 mm off from the F4). Post hoc analysis showed that only the right DLPFC stimulation led to an increase in IC from pre- to post-stimulation. Consistent with this finding, right DLPFC stimulation improved Stroop task performance measured by increased interference score, which represents better inhibition of irrelevant information. These findings provide further insights into the hemispheric difference of tDCS effects and its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results and necessitates further research with a larger cohort for confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70218","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown asymmetric behavioral effects, though the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. In this preliminary study with 34 healthy individuals, tDCS was applied to either the left or right DLPFC or a sham group. Behavioral and neurophysiological changes were examined by the Stroop test and resting-state fMRI, respectively, which were measured before and after a 15-min tDCS session. Seed-to-voxel connectivity analysis with seeds placed under the tDCS target regions (F3 and F4) showed no significant changes, but voxel-to-voxel whole-brain intrinsic connectivity (IC) analysis revealed significant 3 × 2 interaction effects (stimulation site × time) in the right DLPFC (18 mm off from the F4). Post hoc analysis showed that only the right DLPFC stimulation led to an increase in IC from pre- to post-stimulation. Consistent with this finding, right DLPFC stimulation improved Stroop task performance measured by increased interference score, which represents better inhibition of irrelevant information. These findings provide further insights into the hemispheric difference of tDCS effects and its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results and necessitates further research with a larger cohort for confirmation.
期刊介绍:
Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged.
Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.