Hybrid CBSQI-WENO Schemes for Convection-Diffusion Problems

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Prasanta Kumar Barik, Asha Kisan Dond, Amjad Hasan, Rakesh Kumar
{"title":"Hybrid CBSQI-WENO Schemes for Convection-Diffusion Problems","authors":"Prasanta Kumar Barik,&nbsp;Asha Kisan Dond,&nbsp;Amjad Hasan,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar","doi":"10.1002/fld.5380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The B-spline Quasi-Interpolation (BSQI) based numerical scheme is a successful method for obtaining the solution to partial differential equations under sufficient regularity conditions. However, it can lead to instability and spurious oscillations in the numerical solution when high gradients or discontinuities are present. To address this issue, this article proposes a hybrid version of the BSQI scheme to solve convection-diffusion problems. The hybrid scheme combines the Cubic BSQI (CBSQI) scheme with the fifth-order Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO) method to approximate the convective flux, and is able to compute the solution in a non-oscillatory manner. Further, we have introduced an approximate smoothness indicator for the larger stencil of the WENO scheme, derived from the smoothness indicator of the lower-order stencils. The approximate smoothness indicator is used as a troubled-cell indicator in a hybrid scheme and has allowed us to develop an efficient version of the WENO-AO(5,3) scheme (Balsara et al. J. Comp. Phy. 2016), which we call WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme. Additionally, we propose a fifth-order hybrid scheme that combines a finite-difference approximation with the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme to solve convection-diffusion equations. To validate the proposed schemes, we conduct tests on multiple 1D and 2D cases. The hybrid schemes produce comparable results to the WENO scheme while being more computationally efficient. Specifically, the hybrid schemes are 50%–70% more efficient than the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme, while the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme has a 2%–15% advantage over the WENO-AO(5,3) scheme.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 6","pages":"914-939"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The B-spline Quasi-Interpolation (BSQI) based numerical scheme is a successful method for obtaining the solution to partial differential equations under sufficient regularity conditions. However, it can lead to instability and spurious oscillations in the numerical solution when high gradients or discontinuities are present. To address this issue, this article proposes a hybrid version of the BSQI scheme to solve convection-diffusion problems. The hybrid scheme combines the Cubic BSQI (CBSQI) scheme with the fifth-order Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO) method to approximate the convective flux, and is able to compute the solution in a non-oscillatory manner. Further, we have introduced an approximate smoothness indicator for the larger stencil of the WENO scheme, derived from the smoothness indicator of the lower-order stencils. The approximate smoothness indicator is used as a troubled-cell indicator in a hybrid scheme and has allowed us to develop an efficient version of the WENO-AO(5,3) scheme (Balsara et al. J. Comp. Phy. 2016), which we call WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme. Additionally, we propose a fifth-order hybrid scheme that combines a finite-difference approximation with the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme to solve convection-diffusion equations. To validate the proposed schemes, we conduct tests on multiple 1D and 2D cases. The hybrid schemes produce comparable results to the WENO scheme while being more computationally efficient. Specifically, the hybrid schemes are 50%–70% more efficient than the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme, while the WENO-AOA(5,3) scheme has a 2%–15% advantage over the WENO-AO(5,3) scheme.

Abstract Image

对流扩散问题的混合CBSQI-WENO格式
基于b样条拟插值(BSQI)的数值格式是在充分正则性条件下求解偏微分方程的一种成功方法。然而,当存在高梯度或不连续时,它会导致数值解的不稳定和伪振荡。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一个混合版本的BSQI方案来解决对流扩散问题。该混合格式结合了三次BSQI (CBSQI)格式和五阶加权本质非振荡(WENO)方法来近似对流通量,并能以非振荡方式计算解。此外,我们引入了WENO方案中较大模板的近似平滑指标,该指标来自于低阶模板的平滑指标。近似平滑指标被用作混合方案中的故障单元指标,并使我们能够开发出WENO-AO(5,3)方案的有效版本(Balsara等)。J. Comp. Phy. 2016),我们称之为WENO-AOA(5,3)方案。此外,我们提出了一种结合有限差分近似和WENO-AOA(5,3)格式的五阶混合格式来求解对流扩散方程。为了验证所提出的方案,我们在多个一维和二维情况下进行了测试。混合方案的计算效率比WENO方案高,结果与WENO方案相当。其中,混合方案比WENO-AOA(5,3)方案效率高50% ~ 70%,而WENO-AOA(5,3)方案比WENO-AO(5,3)方案效率高2% ~ 15%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信