Social Safety and Health Outcomes in Emerging Adults: Interactions of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Discrimination

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Wendy M. Troxel, Rachana Seelam, Lilian G. Perez, Jordan Davis, Elizabeth J. D'Amico
{"title":"Social Safety and Health Outcomes in Emerging Adults: Interactions of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Discrimination","authors":"Wendy M. Troxel,&nbsp;Rachana Seelam,&nbsp;Lilian G. Perez,&nbsp;Jordan Davis,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. D'Amico","doi":"10.1002/jcop.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Social safety theory suggests that individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic groups or sexual and gender diverse (SGD) groups are exposed to multilevel and interacting stressors, which can set the stage for adverse health outcomes. Using a social safety framework, we examine interactions between discrimination and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on health outcomes and how these interactions may differ by race and ethnicity or SGD status among young adults. An online survey with 2287 young adults (mean age = 25.8 years; 55.5% female) assessed ACEs and interpersonal discrimination and sleep quality, problematic alcohol or cannabis use, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Linear regression analyses tested interactions between ACEs and discrimination in relation to the outcomes among the overall sample and stratified by race and ethnicity or SGD status. In the overall sample, there was one significant interaction between ACEs and discrimination, such that those experiencing both greater exposure to ACEs and greater discrimination reported higher PTSD scores. Race-stratified models showed that among people of color experiencing high levels of ACEs, greater discrimination was associated with greater PTSD scores. SGD-stratified models showed that for problematic alcohol use and PTSD there was a significant interaction between ACEs and discrimination only among non-SGD participants. Consistent with social safety theory, findings highlight the potential health consequences of experiencing both discrimination and childhood adverse experiences. Intervention efforts are needed to help young people increase coping skills and other strategies to promote resilience when experiencing major life stressors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"53 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social safety theory suggests that individuals from minoritized racial and ethnic groups or sexual and gender diverse (SGD) groups are exposed to multilevel and interacting stressors, which can set the stage for adverse health outcomes. Using a social safety framework, we examine interactions between discrimination and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on health outcomes and how these interactions may differ by race and ethnicity or SGD status among young adults. An online survey with 2287 young adults (mean age = 25.8 years; 55.5% female) assessed ACEs and interpersonal discrimination and sleep quality, problematic alcohol or cannabis use, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Linear regression analyses tested interactions between ACEs and discrimination in relation to the outcomes among the overall sample and stratified by race and ethnicity or SGD status. In the overall sample, there was one significant interaction between ACEs and discrimination, such that those experiencing both greater exposure to ACEs and greater discrimination reported higher PTSD scores. Race-stratified models showed that among people of color experiencing high levels of ACEs, greater discrimination was associated with greater PTSD scores. SGD-stratified models showed that for problematic alcohol use and PTSD there was a significant interaction between ACEs and discrimination only among non-SGD participants. Consistent with social safety theory, findings highlight the potential health consequences of experiencing both discrimination and childhood adverse experiences. Intervention efforts are needed to help young people increase coping skills and other strategies to promote resilience when experiencing major life stressors.

初生成人的社会安全和健康结果:不良童年经历和歧视的相互作用
社会安全理论表明,来自少数种族和族裔群体或性和性别多样化群体的个体暴露于多层次和相互作用的压力源,这可能为不良健康结果奠定基础。使用社会安全框架,我们研究了歧视和不良童年经历(ace)之间对健康结果的相互作用,以及这些相互作用如何因种族和民族或年轻人的SGD状态而不同。对2287名年轻人(平均年龄25.8岁;55.5%女性)评估了ace和人际歧视、睡眠质量、酗酒或大麻使用问题以及创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状。线性回归分析测试了ace和歧视之间的相互作用,以及与总体样本的结果有关,并按种族和民族或SGD状态分层。在整个样本中,ace和歧视之间有一个显著的相互作用,比如那些经历过更多ace和更大歧视的人报告了更高的PTSD分数。种族分层模型显示,在经历高ace水平的有色人种中,更大的歧视与更高的PTSD分数相关。sgd分层模型显示,对于有问题的酒精使用和创伤后应激障碍,只有在非sgd参与者中,ace和歧视之间存在显著的相互作用。与社会安全理论一致,研究结果强调了遭受歧视和童年不良经历的潜在健康后果。需要采取干预措施,帮助年轻人提高应对技能和其他策略,以提高他们在经历重大生活压力时的适应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信