Editorial on: The Underappreciated Importance of Mania

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Susan L. McElroy, Mark A. Frye, Balwinder Singh
{"title":"Editorial on: The Underappreciated Importance of Mania","authors":"Susan L. McElroy,&nbsp;Mark A. Frye,&nbsp;Balwinder Singh","doi":"10.1111/acps.13814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this issue of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Drs. Manchia, Miola, Tondo, and Baldessarini [<span>1</span>] provide an important study of individuals with unipolar mania (UPM), defined by these authors as mania or hypomania without depressive episodes. In their study, Manchia and colleagues identified 63 consecutive individuals with UPM and compared them over the long term (up to 9.18 years) to 1210 patients with regular bipolar disorder (mania or hypomania with depressive episodes; BD) recruited from expert mood disorder centers across Italy. Compared with regular BD, the authors found that UPM was uncommon (4.5% of all BD cases over 18.2 years of risk), more common in men, predominantly BD type I (only 0.314% had unipolar hypomania), associated with more psychosis but less suicidality, and associated with greater use of antipsychotics, lithium, and mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants but much less use (27% less) of antidepressants. Over a mean follow-up of 9.18 years, the rate of UPM decreased, suggesting that some of these patients will eventually develop a first depressive episode.</p><p>Many of these findings have been noted in earlier, mostly cross-sectional studies using various definitions of UPM. For example, in a 2023 meta-analysis of 21 studies, UPM was similarly uncommon and associated with male gender and psychotic features, but with fewer suicide attempts [<span>2, 3</span>]. Other findings have included higher rates of hyperthymia, good sleep quality, and morning chronotype in UPM than in regular BD [<span>2-4</span>].</p><p>We were particularly interested in three issues arising from this important article.</p><p>First is regarding the prevalence of UPM. Many studies have suggested that UPM is a relatively uncommon form of BD. Thus, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) found that, using three definitions of UPM, 5.0%–7.2% of individuals from the U.S. with BD type I never had depression [<span>5</span>]. However, evidence exists that UPM may be more common in low-income versus high-income countries. Thus, a study from Ethiopia found 41.7% of participants had UPM [<span>6</span>], while a study from Tunisia found a rate of 56.6% [<span>7</span>]. Although these differences in prevalence rates could be due to methodological issues, including use of different definitions of UPM, one wonders if there are cultural differences regarding the etiology and recognition of BD, particularly manic symptoms. If such cultural issues exist, it would be important to understand them.</p><p>Second is the finding that morning chronotype may be more common in UPM while evening chronotype appears to be more common in regular BD. Our group indeed found that evening chronotype was more common among individuals participating in a BD biobank, and that it was associated with more depressive episodes than participants with non-evening chronotypes [<span>8</span>]. Circadian rhythm dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of BD [<span>9</span>]. Perhaps a greater understanding of chronotype in the broad BD spectrum would lead to important clues into the pathophysiology of this disorder.</p><p>The third issue is that of the clinical importance of hypo/manic symptoms, and how these symptoms may provide some diagnostic and treatment specificity yet have often been neglected by the field of psychiatry. For example, both DSM [<span>10</span>] and ICD<sup>11</sup> still require that symptoms persist for 4 days for a diagnosis of hypomania, despite evidence showing that valid durations of hypomania can also be 1, 2, or 3 days. Similarly, both DSM and ICD specify that a manic episode has to last at least 7 days, unless symptoms trigger a hospitalization or other treatment intervention [<span>10</span>, <span>11</span>]. What if the symptoms trigger a motor vehicle accident, violent behavior, or contact with the judicial system? We argue that such DSM requirements are biased against the diagnosis of hypo/manic symptoms, which might provide greater diagnostic and treatment specificity than anxious, depressive, and even psychotic symptoms.</p><p>In short, growing literature indicates a subset of individuals who have a manic or hypomanic episode will go on to have no depressive episodes. We agree with Dr. Manchia and colleagues that it is reasonable to identify UPM as a subtype of BD. However, it is important to realize that one subtype of BD can transition into another subtype, and that there is little information on how to treat an individual with long-standing UPM who has a first onset depressive episode. Thus, treatment of these individuals requires in-depth knowledge of the phenomenology and pharmacology of this disorder.</p><p>S.L.M. drafted the initial manuscript. M.A.F. and B.S. provided feedback and edits. All three authors worked on and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>Dr. Susan L. McElroy has been a consultant to or a member of the scientific advisory boards of Axsome, Idorsia, Kallyope, Levo, Novo Nordisk, and Soleno. She has been a principal or co-investigator on studies sponsored by Axsome and the Marriott Foundation. She is also an inventor on United States Patent No. 6,323,236 B2, Use of Sulfamate Derivatives for Treating Impulse Control Disorders, and along with the patent's assignee, the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, has received payments from Johnson &amp; Johnson, which has exclusive rights under the patent. Dr. Mark Frye has been a consultant to or member of the scientific advisory boards of Carnot Laboratories and American Physician Institute. He has been a principal or co-investigator on studies sponsored by Assurex Health, Baszucki Group, Breakthrough Discoveries for Thriving with Bipolar Disorder (BD2), and Mayo Foundation. He also has financial interest/stock ownership/royalties with Chymia LLC. Dr. Balwinder Singh has received research grant support from Mayo Clinic, the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC), Breakthrough Discoveries for Thriving with Bipolar Disorder (BD2) and NIH. He is a KL2 Mentored Career Development Program scholar, supported by CTSA Grant Number KL2TR002379 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). Dr. Singh has received honoraria (to Mayo Clinic) from Elsevier for editing a Clinical Overview on Treatment-Resistant Depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"151 6","pages":"651-652"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13814","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this issue of Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Drs. Manchia, Miola, Tondo, and Baldessarini [1] provide an important study of individuals with unipolar mania (UPM), defined by these authors as mania or hypomania without depressive episodes. In their study, Manchia and colleagues identified 63 consecutive individuals with UPM and compared them over the long term (up to 9.18 years) to 1210 patients with regular bipolar disorder (mania or hypomania with depressive episodes; BD) recruited from expert mood disorder centers across Italy. Compared with regular BD, the authors found that UPM was uncommon (4.5% of all BD cases over 18.2 years of risk), more common in men, predominantly BD type I (only 0.314% had unipolar hypomania), associated with more psychosis but less suicidality, and associated with greater use of antipsychotics, lithium, and mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants but much less use (27% less) of antidepressants. Over a mean follow-up of 9.18 years, the rate of UPM decreased, suggesting that some of these patients will eventually develop a first depressive episode.

Many of these findings have been noted in earlier, mostly cross-sectional studies using various definitions of UPM. For example, in a 2023 meta-analysis of 21 studies, UPM was similarly uncommon and associated with male gender and psychotic features, but with fewer suicide attempts [2, 3]. Other findings have included higher rates of hyperthymia, good sleep quality, and morning chronotype in UPM than in regular BD [2-4].

We were particularly interested in three issues arising from this important article.

First is regarding the prevalence of UPM. Many studies have suggested that UPM is a relatively uncommon form of BD. Thus, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) found that, using three definitions of UPM, 5.0%–7.2% of individuals from the U.S. with BD type I never had depression [5]. However, evidence exists that UPM may be more common in low-income versus high-income countries. Thus, a study from Ethiopia found 41.7% of participants had UPM [6], while a study from Tunisia found a rate of 56.6% [7]. Although these differences in prevalence rates could be due to methodological issues, including use of different definitions of UPM, one wonders if there are cultural differences regarding the etiology and recognition of BD, particularly manic symptoms. If such cultural issues exist, it would be important to understand them.

Second is the finding that morning chronotype may be more common in UPM while evening chronotype appears to be more common in regular BD. Our group indeed found that evening chronotype was more common among individuals participating in a BD biobank, and that it was associated with more depressive episodes than participants with non-evening chronotypes [8]. Circadian rhythm dysfunction has been implicated in the pathophysiology of BD [9]. Perhaps a greater understanding of chronotype in the broad BD spectrum would lead to important clues into the pathophysiology of this disorder.

The third issue is that of the clinical importance of hypo/manic symptoms, and how these symptoms may provide some diagnostic and treatment specificity yet have often been neglected by the field of psychiatry. For example, both DSM [10] and ICD11 still require that symptoms persist for 4 days for a diagnosis of hypomania, despite evidence showing that valid durations of hypomania can also be 1, 2, or 3 days. Similarly, both DSM and ICD specify that a manic episode has to last at least 7 days, unless symptoms trigger a hospitalization or other treatment intervention [10, 11]. What if the symptoms trigger a motor vehicle accident, violent behavior, or contact with the judicial system? We argue that such DSM requirements are biased against the diagnosis of hypo/manic symptoms, which might provide greater diagnostic and treatment specificity than anxious, depressive, and even psychotic symptoms.

In short, growing literature indicates a subset of individuals who have a manic or hypomanic episode will go on to have no depressive episodes. We agree with Dr. Manchia and colleagues that it is reasonable to identify UPM as a subtype of BD. However, it is important to realize that one subtype of BD can transition into another subtype, and that there is little information on how to treat an individual with long-standing UPM who has a first onset depressive episode. Thus, treatment of these individuals requires in-depth knowledge of the phenomenology and pharmacology of this disorder.

S.L.M. drafted the initial manuscript. M.A.F. and B.S. provided feedback and edits. All three authors worked on and approved the final manuscript.

Dr. Susan L. McElroy has been a consultant to or a member of the scientific advisory boards of Axsome, Idorsia, Kallyope, Levo, Novo Nordisk, and Soleno. She has been a principal or co-investigator on studies sponsored by Axsome and the Marriott Foundation. She is also an inventor on United States Patent No. 6,323,236 B2, Use of Sulfamate Derivatives for Treating Impulse Control Disorders, and along with the patent's assignee, the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, has received payments from Johnson & Johnson, which has exclusive rights under the patent. Dr. Mark Frye has been a consultant to or member of the scientific advisory boards of Carnot Laboratories and American Physician Institute. He has been a principal or co-investigator on studies sponsored by Assurex Health, Baszucki Group, Breakthrough Discoveries for Thriving with Bipolar Disorder (BD2), and Mayo Foundation. He also has financial interest/stock ownership/royalties with Chymia LLC. Dr. Balwinder Singh has received research grant support from Mayo Clinic, the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC), Breakthrough Discoveries for Thriving with Bipolar Disorder (BD2) and NIH. He is a KL2 Mentored Career Development Program scholar, supported by CTSA Grant Number KL2TR002379 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). Dr. Singh has received honoraria (to Mayo Clinic) from Elsevier for editing a Clinical Overview on Treatment-Resistant Depression.

社论:狂热的重要性未被充分认识
在这一期的《斯堪的纳维亚精神病学学报》上,Manchia、Miola、Tondo和Baldessarini等人对单极躁狂(UPM)进行了一项重要的研究,这些作者将其定义为无抑郁发作的躁狂或轻躁狂。在他们的研究中,Manchia及其同事确定了63名连续的UPM患者,并将他们长期(长达9.18年)与1210名常规双相情感障碍患者(躁狂或轻躁狂伴抑郁发作;从意大利各地的情绪障碍专家中心招募。与常规双相障碍相比,作者发现UPM不常见(占18.2年风险的所有双相障碍病例的4.5%),在男性中更常见,主要是双相障碍I型(只有0.314%患有单极轻躁狂),与更多的精神病患者相关,但自杀倾向较少,与更多使用抗精神病药物,锂和情绪稳定抗惊厥药物相关,但使用抗抑郁药物较少(减少27%)。在平均9.18年的随访中,UPM的发生率下降,这表明其中一些患者最终会出现首次抑郁发作。许多这些发现已经在早期被注意到,主要是使用各种UPM定义的横断面研究。例如,在2023年对21项研究的荟萃分析中,UPM同样不常见,与男性性别和精神病特征有关,但自杀企图较少[2,3]。其他研究结果还包括UPM患者比常规BD患者有更高的胸气亢进率、良好的睡眠质量和晨间睡眠类型[2-4]。我们对这篇重要文章引起的三个问题特别感兴趣。首先是关于UPM的流行。许多研究表明,UPM是一种相对罕见的双相障碍。因此,国家酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)发现,使用UPM的三种定义,5.0%-7.2%的美国双相障碍I型患者从未患过抑郁症。然而,有证据表明,UPM可能在低收入国家比高收入国家更常见。因此,来自埃塞俄比亚的一项研究发现41.7%的参与者有UPM[7],而来自突尼斯的一项研究发现56.6%的参与者有UPM[7]。虽然这些患病率的差异可能是由于方法问题,包括使用不同的UPM定义,但人们想知道在双相障碍的病因和认知方面是否存在文化差异,特别是躁狂症状。如果存在这样的文化问题,了解它们是很重要的。其次,我们发现晨起型可能在UPM患者中更常见,而夜间型似乎在常规BD患者中更常见。我们的研究小组确实发现,夜间型在BD生物样本库的个体中更常见,而且与非夜间型[8]的参与者相比,它与更多的抑郁发作有关。昼夜节律功能障碍与BD的病理生理有关。也许对广义双相障碍的时间型的更深入的了解将为这种疾病的病理生理学提供重要的线索。第三个问题是低躁/躁症状的临床重要性,以及这些症状如何提供一些诊断和治疗特异性,但往往被精神病学领域所忽视。例如,DSM[10]和ICD11仍然要求症状持续4天才能诊断为轻躁狂,尽管有证据表明轻躁狂的有效持续时间也可以是1天、2天或3天。同样,DSM和ICD都规定躁狂发作必须持续至少7天,除非症状引发住院或其他治疗干预[10,11]。如果这些症状引发了机动车事故、暴力行为或与司法系统接触怎么办?我们认为这样的DSM要求对低/躁狂症状的诊断是有偏见的,低/躁狂症状可能比焦虑、抑郁甚至精神病症状提供更大的诊断和治疗特异性。简而言之,越来越多的文献表明,一部分有躁狂或轻躁发作的个体将不会再有抑郁发作。我们同意Manchia博士及其同事的观点,认为将UPM确定为双相障碍的一种亚型是合理的。然而,重要的是要认识到,一种亚型的双相障碍可以转变为另一种亚型,而且关于如何治疗长期UPM且首次发作抑郁发作的个体的信息很少。因此,治疗这些个体需要对这种疾病的现象学和药理学有深入的了解。起草初稿。M.A.F.和B.S.提供了反馈和编辑。三位作者都参与并批准了最终的手稿。Susan L. McElroy是Axsome、Idorsia、Kallyope、Levo、Novo Nordisk和Soleno的顾问或科学顾问委员会成员。她是Axsome和万豪基金会赞助的研究的主要或共同研究者。 她也是美国专利号6,323,236 B2的发明人,使用磺胺酸衍生物治疗冲动控制障碍,并与该专利的受让人,俄亥俄州辛辛那提市的辛辛那提大学一起,收到了强生公司的付款;强生公司拥有这项专利的专有权。Mark Frye博士是卡诺实验室和美国医师协会科学顾问委员会的顾问或成员。他是由Assurex Health、Baszucki Group、突破性发现治疗双相情感障碍(BD2)和梅奥基金会赞助的研究的主要或共同研究者。他还拥有Chymia LLC的经济权益/股权/版权费。Balwinder Singh博士获得了梅奥诊所、国家抑郁症中心网络(NNDC)、双相情感障碍(BD2)突破性发现和NIH的研究资助支持。他是KL2指导职业发展计划的学者,由国家促进转化科学中心(NCATS)的CTSA资助号KL2TR002379支持。辛格博士因编辑《难治性抑郁症临床综述》而获得了爱思唯尔的酬金(给梅奥诊所)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信