Safety practices and incidents during occupational, physical, and speech language therapies that use hippotherapy in the US: A 5-year survey study

Macie M. Bicandi , Beth E. Fields , Ellen A. Erdman , B. Caitlin Peters
{"title":"Safety practices and incidents during occupational, physical, and speech language therapies that use hippotherapy in the US: A 5-year survey study","authors":"Macie M. Bicandi ,&nbsp;Beth E. Fields ,&nbsp;Ellen A. Erdman ,&nbsp;B. Caitlin Peters","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hippotherapy is the use of equine movement as a treatment tool within occupational, physical, or speech-language therapy sessions to achieve functional outcomes. While effective, its implementation presents unique safety concerns. The purpose of this study is to describe safety incidents and safety practices in occupational, physical, and speech-language therapy incorporating hippotherapy in the U.S. across five years, 2019–2023. The five-year survey study gathered data from therapists or therapy assistants integrating hippotherapy into occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech-language therapy. The survey asked questions regarding respondents’ clinical background and experience, safety practices, and safety incidents that occurred in their therapy sessions using hippotherapy in the previous 12 months. Across the 455 responses, descriptive statistics were calculated, and negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of safety incidents. Out of 188,267 reported therapy sessions, client safety occurrences requiring basic first aid were reported in 0.03 % of sessions, and client injuries occurred in 0.004 % of sessions. While uncommon, client injuries included fractures, soft-tissue injuries, and concussions. Safety predictors included PATH, Intl affiliation, helmet use during ground activities, and emergency dismounts performed. Wearing helmets during ground activities reduced incidents, while frequent emergency dismounts were associated with more safety occurrences. Overall, this study suggests that industry-recommended safety protocols are widely implemented, likely contributing to the rarity of safety incidents during therapy sessions that integrate horses. Findings highlight the importance of helmet use during ground activities and proactive risk management. This research can support informed risk/benefit analyses concerning the use of hippotherapy within therapy sessions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hippotherapy is the use of equine movement as a treatment tool within occupational, physical, or speech-language therapy sessions to achieve functional outcomes. While effective, its implementation presents unique safety concerns. The purpose of this study is to describe safety incidents and safety practices in occupational, physical, and speech-language therapy incorporating hippotherapy in the U.S. across five years, 2019–2023. The five-year survey study gathered data from therapists or therapy assistants integrating hippotherapy into occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech-language therapy. The survey asked questions regarding respondents’ clinical background and experience, safety practices, and safety incidents that occurred in their therapy sessions using hippotherapy in the previous 12 months. Across the 455 responses, descriptive statistics were calculated, and negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of safety incidents. Out of 188,267 reported therapy sessions, client safety occurrences requiring basic first aid were reported in 0.03 % of sessions, and client injuries occurred in 0.004 % of sessions. While uncommon, client injuries included fractures, soft-tissue injuries, and concussions. Safety predictors included PATH, Intl affiliation, helmet use during ground activities, and emergency dismounts performed. Wearing helmets during ground activities reduced incidents, while frequent emergency dismounts were associated with more safety occurrences. Overall, this study suggests that industry-recommended safety protocols are widely implemented, likely contributing to the rarity of safety incidents during therapy sessions that integrate horses. Findings highlight the importance of helmet use during ground activities and proactive risk management. This research can support informed risk/benefit analyses concerning the use of hippotherapy within therapy sessions.
美国使用海马疗法的职业、物理和语言治疗中的安全实践和事故:一项为期5年的调查研究
海马疗法是利用马的运动作为一种治疗工具,在职业、身体或语言治疗过程中达到功能效果。虽然有效,但它的实施带来了独特的安全问题。本研究的目的是描述2019-2023年美国职业、物理和语言治疗中纳入海马疗法的安全事件和安全实践。这项为期五年的调查研究收集了治疗师或治疗助理将海马疗法整合到职业治疗、物理治疗或语言治疗中的数据。该调查询问了受访者的临床背景和经验、安全实践以及在过去12个月内使用海马疗法治疗期间发生的安全事件。对455份回复进行描述性统计,并使用负二项回归来确定安全事件的预测因子。在报告的188,267次治疗中,0.03% %的治疗中报告了需要基本急救的病人安全事件,0.004% %的治疗中报告了病人受伤事件。虽然不常见,但病人损伤包括骨折、软组织损伤和脑震荡。安全预测指标包括PATH、国际联盟、地面活动期间头盔的使用和紧急下马。在地面活动期间戴头盔减少了事故,而频繁的紧急下马与更多的安全事故有关。总的来说,这项研究表明,行业推荐的安全协议得到了广泛实施,这可能有助于在与马结合的治疗过程中很少发生安全事件。调查结果强调了在地面活动中使用头盔和主动风险管理的重要性。这项研究可以支持在治疗过程中使用海马疗法的知情风险/收益分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信