Callum Highmore , Kirsty Cooper , Joe Parker , Joshua Robinson , Roberto Castangia , Jeremy S. Webb
{"title":"Real-time Detection of Foodborne Pathogens and Biofilm in the Food Processing Environment with Bactiscan, A Macro-scale Fluorescence Device","authors":"Callum Highmore , Kirsty Cooper , Joe Parker , Joshua Robinson , Roberto Castangia , Jeremy S. Webb","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food safety relies on rapid detection methods and rigorous sampling of the food processing environment and is challenged by recurrent biofilm contamination and by sublethally injured bacteria that can evade detection. Bactiscan is investigated as an alternative detection approach, a macro-scale and reagentless device that detects microbial contamination through activating the green fluorescence of glycoproteins in the bacterial cell wall. The detection capability of Bactiscan was tested on foodborne pathogens <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em>, <em>Salmonella enterica</em>, and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Detection by Bactiscan was assessed using 3 independent observers viewing bacterial samples dried on stainless steel, using 3 biological repeats and 5 technical repeats. Detection by Bactiscan was possible to 1.20 * 10<sup>6</sup> colony forming units (CFU), compared to 1.36 * 10<sup>4</sup> CFU by ATP swab testing, where Bactiscan detection limits were defined by the concentration at which 50% of the samples were observed under illumination of the device. Heat-killed and chlorine-stressed <em>E. coli</em> and <em>S. enterica</em> caused a 2-log reduction in detection by ATP swab tests (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05), while detection by Bactiscan was unaffected (<em>p</em> ≥ 0.05). Pathogen biofilms were detectable via Bactiscan with >80% accuracy at 4 days of growth; <em>E. coli</em> and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> biofilms were visible at 2 days of growth. <em>In situ</em> contamination studies determined that Bactiscan can detect microbial contamination on chicken, salmon, and yoghurt samples with stronger fluorescence than a competitor’s UV torch. The presence of one of the pathogens on the food samples was confirmed by metagenome sequencing, determining that <em>S. aureus</em> was present in 7 samples out of 9 with a relative abundance of >0.5%. These data demonstrate that Bactiscan can effectively detect bacteria present in the food processing environment and can complement existing technologies to improve food industry cleaning practices and infection prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 6","pages":"Article 100511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000638","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Food safety relies on rapid detection methods and rigorous sampling of the food processing environment and is challenged by recurrent biofilm contamination and by sublethally injured bacteria that can evade detection. Bactiscan is investigated as an alternative detection approach, a macro-scale and reagentless device that detects microbial contamination through activating the green fluorescence of glycoproteins in the bacterial cell wall. The detection capability of Bactiscan was tested on foodborne pathogens Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica, and Staphylococcus aureus. Detection by Bactiscan was assessed using 3 independent observers viewing bacterial samples dried on stainless steel, using 3 biological repeats and 5 technical repeats. Detection by Bactiscan was possible to 1.20 * 106 colony forming units (CFU), compared to 1.36 * 104 CFU by ATP swab testing, where Bactiscan detection limits were defined by the concentration at which 50% of the samples were observed under illumination of the device. Heat-killed and chlorine-stressed E. coli and S. enterica caused a 2-log reduction in detection by ATP swab tests (p ≤ 0.05), while detection by Bactiscan was unaffected (p ≥ 0.05). Pathogen biofilms were detectable via Bactiscan with >80% accuracy at 4 days of growth; E. coli and L. monocytogenes biofilms were visible at 2 days of growth. In situ contamination studies determined that Bactiscan can detect microbial contamination on chicken, salmon, and yoghurt samples with stronger fluorescence than a competitor’s UV torch. The presence of one of the pathogens on the food samples was confirmed by metagenome sequencing, determining that S. aureus was present in 7 samples out of 9 with a relative abundance of >0.5%. These data demonstrate that Bactiscan can effectively detect bacteria present in the food processing environment and can complement existing technologies to improve food industry cleaning practices and infection prevention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.