Utility of very high-pressure valves in persistent symptomatic shunt overdrainage

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Iván Federico Narváez Moscoso, Bienvenido Ros López, Sara Iglesias Moroño, Julia Casado Ruiz, Raquel Simón Wolter, Miguel Ángel Arráez Sánchez
{"title":"Utility of very high-pressure valves in persistent symptomatic shunt overdrainage","authors":"Iván Federico Narváez Moscoso,&nbsp;Bienvenido Ros López,&nbsp;Sara Iglesias Moroño,&nbsp;Julia Casado Ruiz,&nbsp;Raquel Simón Wolter,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Arráez Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Shunt overdrainage is one of the long-term complications associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Treatment of refractory cases may require further upgrading of both the valve opening pressure and antisiphon device. The aim of this paper is to describe the results of this combination in a selected group of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study that included 18 pediatric patients between 2003–2022. Previous shunts were exchanged for the combination of a SOPHYSA Polaris® SPVA-300 valve and upgraded fixed or adjustable antigravitatory devices. The following variables were collected: etiology of the hydrocephalus, age at first shunt and type of valve, number of shunt revisions, other surgical procedures, age at inclusion, clinical and radiological outcomes, and follow-up time. A descriptive analysis was done with means, medians and ranges for quantitative variables; percentages and frequencies for the analysis of qualitative data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median age at first shunt was two months (0–67). The mean number of shunt revisions before inclusion was three. Shunt removal was attempted in seven patients without success; temporary success was observed in two patients who underwent ETV. Two patients had previous cranial expansions. The mean age at inclusion was 9.1 years (2.7–15.2). After the shunt system was exchanged and upgraded, clinical improvement was observed in 94.4% (17/18) of patients, and radiological improvement was observed in 83.3% (15/18) of patients. The median follow-up was 21 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Before considering more invasive therapeutic measures, shunt system optimization by the combination of very high-pressure valves and upgraded in-line antisiphon devices is a valid and safe strategy for refractory symptomatic shunt overdrainage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147324001167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Shunt overdrainage is one of the long-term complications associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Treatment of refractory cases may require further upgrading of both the valve opening pressure and antisiphon device. The aim of this paper is to describe the results of this combination in a selected group of patients.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study that included 18 pediatric patients between 2003–2022. Previous shunts were exchanged for the combination of a SOPHYSA Polaris® SPVA-300 valve and upgraded fixed or adjustable antigravitatory devices. The following variables were collected: etiology of the hydrocephalus, age at first shunt and type of valve, number of shunt revisions, other surgical procedures, age at inclusion, clinical and radiological outcomes, and follow-up time. A descriptive analysis was done with means, medians and ranges for quantitative variables; percentages and frequencies for the analysis of qualitative data.

Results

The median age at first shunt was two months (0–67). The mean number of shunt revisions before inclusion was three. Shunt removal was attempted in seven patients without success; temporary success was observed in two patients who underwent ETV. Two patients had previous cranial expansions. The mean age at inclusion was 9.1 years (2.7–15.2). After the shunt system was exchanged and upgraded, clinical improvement was observed in 94.4% (17/18) of patients, and radiological improvement was observed in 83.3% (15/18) of patients. The median follow-up was 21 months.

Conclusions

Before considering more invasive therapeutic measures, shunt system optimization by the combination of very high-pressure valves and upgraded in-line antisiphon devices is a valid and safe strategy for refractory symptomatic shunt overdrainage.
超高压阀在持续症状性分流过排中的应用
导读:分流管过引流是脑室-腹膜分流术的长期并发症之一。难治性病例的治疗可能需要进一步升级阀门开启压力和反虹吸装置。本文的目的是描述这种组合在一组选定的患者的结果。方法回顾性队列研究,纳入2003-2022年间18例儿科患者。以前的分流器被换成了一个sopysa Polaris®SPVA-300阀和升级的固定或可调反重力装置的组合。收集以下变量:脑积水的病因、首次分流术的年龄和瓣膜类型、分流术的翻修次数、其他手术方式、入组时的年龄、临床和放射学结果以及随访时间。对定量变量的均值、中位数和极差进行描述性分析;用于定性数据分析的百分比和频率。结果首次分流术的中位年龄为2个月(0 ~ 67岁)。纳入前的平均分流修正次数为3次。7例患者尝试分流术,但未成功;在两例接受ETV的患者中观察到暂时的成功。两名患者之前有过颅骨扩张。入组时平均年龄为9.1岁(2.7-15.2岁)。分流系统更换升级后,94.4%(17/18)患者临床改善,83.3%(15/18)患者影像学改善。中位随访时间为21个月。结论在考虑更有创性的治疗措施之前,通过超高压阀和升级的在线反虹吸装置联合优化分流系统是治疗难治性症状性分流过引流的有效且安全的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocirugia
Neurocirugia 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences. All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信