Validation of a video-based pose estimation algorithm for the assessment of balance error scoring system in single limb stance test

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Yu Yuan Lee, Lena Fennen, Rosemary Dubbeldam
{"title":"Validation of a video-based pose estimation algorithm for the assessment of balance error scoring system in single limb stance test","authors":"Yu Yuan Lee,&nbsp;Lena Fennen,&nbsp;Rosemary Dubbeldam","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Single Limb Stance Test (SLST) is a reliable and validated test to estimate balance performance. However, assessment of the SLST performance, e.g. by using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), can be time-consuming and subjective. To deliver effective balance interventions, a reliable and accessible balance assessment method is imperative.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Can video-based pose estimation be effectively utilized to validate the BESS assessment for SLST, as compared to both human observation and marker-based assessment methods?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>60-second eyes-closed SLST trials were recorded using an iPad camera and a marker-based motion capture system. Mediapipe was applied to estimate the whole-body kinematics from the video recordings. The kinematic data were processed by threshold-based error detection algorithms to calculate the corresponding BESS total and sub-scores. To validate the video-based BESS assessment, the results were compared to human and marker-based motion capture system BESS assessments using repeated measures ANOVA and correlation coefficients (CC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no significant difference in the BESS total score between the assessment methods and the correlation between assessment methods was good with CC’s ranging from 0.69 to 0.77. However, a significant difference in BESS forefoot and heel lifting sub-scores between the video-based and the human or marker-based assessments was found because Mediapipe failed to capture the detail of the foot motion.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Video-based pose estimation is a reliable and accessible method to assess SLST performance. It can be used to examine and speed up SLST assessment using the BESS total score. However, future research and development in capturing foot motion is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096663622500178X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Single Limb Stance Test (SLST) is a reliable and validated test to estimate balance performance. However, assessment of the SLST performance, e.g. by using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), can be time-consuming and subjective. To deliver effective balance interventions, a reliable and accessible balance assessment method is imperative.

Research question

Can video-based pose estimation be effectively utilized to validate the BESS assessment for SLST, as compared to both human observation and marker-based assessment methods?

Methods

60-second eyes-closed SLST trials were recorded using an iPad camera and a marker-based motion capture system. Mediapipe was applied to estimate the whole-body kinematics from the video recordings. The kinematic data were processed by threshold-based error detection algorithms to calculate the corresponding BESS total and sub-scores. To validate the video-based BESS assessment, the results were compared to human and marker-based motion capture system BESS assessments using repeated measures ANOVA and correlation coefficients (CC).

Results

There was no significant difference in the BESS total score between the assessment methods and the correlation between assessment methods was good with CC’s ranging from 0.69 to 0.77. However, a significant difference in BESS forefoot and heel lifting sub-scores between the video-based and the human or marker-based assessments was found because Mediapipe failed to capture the detail of the foot motion.

Significance

Video-based pose estimation is a reliable and accessible method to assess SLST performance. It can be used to examine and speed up SLST assessment using the BESS total score. However, future research and development in capturing foot motion is needed.
基于视频的姿态估计算法在单肢姿态测试中平衡误差评分系统评估中的验证
单肢站立测试(SLST)是一种可靠且有效的评估平衡能力的测试。然而,对SLST性能的评估,例如使用平衡误差评分系统(BESS),可能既耗时又主观。为了提供有效的平衡干预,一种可靠的、可访问的平衡评估方法是必不可少的。与人类观察和基于标记的评估方法相比,基于视频的姿态估计是否可以有效地用于验证SLST的BESS评估?方法采用iPad相机和基于标记的运动捕捉系统记录60秒闭眼SLST试验。应用Mediapipe从视频记录中估计全身运动学。采用基于阈值的误差检测算法对运动数据进行处理,计算相应的BESS总分和分值。为了验证基于视频的BESS评估,使用重复测量方差分析和相关系数(CC)将结果与人类和基于标记的动作捕捉系统BESS评估进行比较。结果各评价方法间BESS总分差异无统计学意义,各评价方法间相关性较好,CC值在0.69 ~ 0.77之间。然而,由于Mediapipe未能捕捉足部运动的细节,我们发现基于视频和人类或基于标记的评估在BESS前足和脚跟抬起分值上存在显著差异。基于视频的姿态估计是评估SLST性能的一种可靠且可访问的方法。它可以用来检查和加快使用BESS总分的SLST评估。然而,未来的研究和发展需要捕捉足部运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信